> On Fri, 03 Aug 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> Firstly, there is a result mismatch for council-201206 election.
> More specifically, the countify results are:
> [["dberkholz"], ["grobian"], ["chainsaw"], ["scarabeus"], ["ulm"],
> ["betelgeuse"], ...]
> While devotee considers ulm and
Hello everyone,
please review the following news item. The 'xx'-es will be replaced with
the publication date.
---
Title: OpenSSH LDAP support
Author: Thomas Deutschmann
Posted: 2018-08-xx
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: net-misc/openssh
When your sshd authenticates
W dniu pią, 03.08.2018 o godzinie 18∶28 +0300, użytkownik Andrew
Savchenko napisał:
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 17:00:51 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > Inspired by Robin, I've started working on scripts to verify old Gentoo
> > election results. Since our election mechanism is
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 17:00:51 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> Inspired by Robin, I've started working on scripts to verify old Gentoo
> election results. Since our election mechanism is apparently the same
> as used by Debian, it seemed an obvious choice to use the Debian tooling
>
Hi, everyone.
Inspired by Robin, I've started working on scripts to verify old Gentoo
election results. Since our election mechanism is apparently the same
as used by Debian, it seemed an obvious choice to use the Debian tooling
(devotee) to verify our results.
I've been able to successfully
I have opened a tracker bug for cross compilation issues:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/662714
Bugs on packages that fail to build with crossdev and patches for those
bugs are more than welcome. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:13:35AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Just wondering, we have get_libname, get_modname, shouldn't we just
> introduce get_linklibname or something instead of trying to overload
> get_libname?
>
> The implementation of get_linklibname could be to just call get_libname
>
Just wondering, we have get_libname, get_modname, shouldn't we just
introduce get_linklibname or something instead of trying to overload
get_libname?
The implementation of get_linklibname could be to just call get_libname
for anything but mingw of course.
Fabian
On 03-08-2018 00:09:41 -0500,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:25:28AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu pią, 03.08.2018 o godzinie 00∶09 -0500, użytkownik Marty E.
> Plummer napisał:
> > Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer
> > ---
> >
> > On mingw-w64 (and perhaps cygwin and mingw.org), there are two forms of
> > non-static
W dniu pią, 03.08.2018 o godzinie 00∶09 -0500, użytkownik Marty E.
Plummer napisał:
> Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer
> ---
>
> On mingw-w64 (and perhaps cygwin and mingw.org), there are two forms of
> non-static libraries. Standard *.dll libraries are for runtime and are
> loaded from %PATH% on
10 matches
Mail list logo
