Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFCv2] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Michał Górny
So v2, taking Patrick's requests into consideration: 2.7 3.6 3.7 3.8 2020-07-01 | | | upy3.8 target unmasked | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020-09-01 | | w |py3.7→3.8 migr. warning | | | |

[gentoo-dev] Last-rite x11-themes/terminology-themes

2020-06-01 Thread Joonas Niilola
# Last snapshot is from 2+ years ago, which doesn't build. Latest # upstream commit won't build with in-tree efl versions. Has a bug # open and unanswered for 2 years, so this package seems unmaintained # in Gentoo. Removal in ~30 days. Bug #656098 -- juippis signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 11:07:39PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 15:49 -0500, Matthias Maier wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, at 15:27 CDT, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > 2020-08-01 Python 3.7 migration deadline > > > > > >After this date, we lastrite all remaining

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-cpp/asio

2020-06-01 Thread Stefan Strogin
Hi, I don't use dev-cpp/asio or any of its reverse dependencies any longer. CC to mysql-bugs, because sys-cluster/galera depends on dev-cpp/asio.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Patrick McLean
On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 23:04:38 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:34 -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 22:27:19 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > Hi, everyone. > > > > > > I'd like to be more proactive in avoiding the mess like Python 3.6->3.7 > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 15:49 -0500, Matthias Maier wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, at 15:27 CDT, Michał Górny wrote: > > > 2020-08-01 Python 3.7 migration deadline > > > >After this date, we lastrite all remaining packages that haven't been > >ported. This gives people roughly two

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:34 -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: > On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 22:27:19 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I'd like to be more proactive in avoiding the mess like Python 3.6->3.7 > > switch were. For this reason, I think it would be better to set > > and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Matthias Maier
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, at 15:27 CDT, Michał Górny wrote: > 2020-08-01 Python 3.7 migration deadline > >After this date, we lastrite all remaining packages that haven't been >ported. This gives people roughly two months, with a ping one month >from now. > [...] > 2020-12-01

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Patrick McLean
On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 22:27:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I'd like to be more proactive in avoiding the mess like Python 3.6->3.7 > switch were. For this reason, I think it would be better to set > and publish some early deadlines. Even if we aren't going to strictly > keep

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deadlines for next Python implementations

2020-06-01 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. I'd like to be more proactive in avoiding the mess like Python 3.6->3.7 switch were. For this reason, I think it would be better to set and publish some early deadlines. Even if we aren't going to strictly keep to them, it would help people realize how much time there is left to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo/OpenBSD current status

2020-06-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Benda Xu wrote: > > I was wondering if the openbsd prefix support is something > > that is still garnering any interest from gentoo? > > There is still interest in Gentoo. But no one seems to have energy to > take care of it. FWIW I have interest in this as well. > Your contribution is

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding GOPATH to ENV_UNSET in base profile

2020-06-01 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:06 PM William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > The GOPATH variable has similar issues to GOBIN [1], so I would like to > add it along side GOBIN to ENV_UNSET in the base profile. > > The message link below is only there for reference, but I see ebuilds > unsetting GOPATH in the

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-dicts/stardict-quick-eng-fra

2020-06-01 Thread Jonas Stein
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=be10f7c82a66b763cab3b3de571b0e31de43e54c # Jonas Stein (2020-06-01) # Last rite package due to missing/unclear license. # Removal after 2020-08-01 # Bug 687664 app-dicts/stardict-quick-eng-fra -- Best regards, Jonas Stein

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-action/slune, dev-python/editobj, dev-python/py2play, dev-python/pyopenal, dev-python/soya

2020-06-01 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2020-06-01) # Effectively unmaintained, Python 2 only game and its dependencies. # Removal in 30 days. games-action/slune dev-python/editobj dev-python/py2play dev-python/pyopenal dev-python/soya -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally