[gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Fāng-ruì Sòng
(I replied via https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not subscribe to gentoo-dev via the official https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/ so my reply is missing) On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:09 PM Manoj

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Manoj Gupta
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:44 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 21:44 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > > ... games-arcade/xboing are also suspect. > > > > (This one's fine, that's the documented way to do things now. Although > I don't see why we couldn't use a separate group

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 21:44 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > ... games-arcade/xboing are also suspect. > (This one's fine, that's the documented way to do things now. Although I don't see why we couldn't use a separate group for each game's score file.)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 18:25 -0800, Manoj Gupta wrote: > > > > Root is the owner but often there is also a group that has access to the > files. > After stripping with llvm-strip, new ownership is root:root instead of > root:. > Therefore, the members of the group lose access to the files post

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Fangrui Song
On 2021-02-09, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:53 -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: (I replied via https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not subscribe to gentoo-dev via the official

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Manoj Gupta
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:02 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:53 -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > > (I replied via > https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng > > "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not > > subscribe to gentoo-dev via

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:53 -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > (I replied via https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng > "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not > subscribe to gentoo-dev via the official > https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/ so

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/cryptography to use rust, effectively killing alpha, hppa, ia64, m68k, s390

2021-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 08:51 +0800, Benda Xu wrote: > > > > The first big blocker we're going to hit is trustme [3] package that > > relies on cryptography API pretty heavily to generate TLS certs for > > testing. If we managed to convince upstream to support an alternate > > crypto backend, we'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/cryptography to use rust, effectively killing alpha, hppa, ia64, m68k, s390

2021-02-09 Thread Tim Harder
On 2021-02-09 Tue 17:51, Benda Xu wrote: > I am wondering how useable pkgcore is on alpha, hppa, etc. Maybe it's > time for us to plan for a Gentoo without essential Python dependency. Just to keep misinformation down, pkgcore currently has nothing to do with rust as it's implemented in python

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/cryptography to use rust, effectively killing alpha, hppa, ia64, m68k, s390

2021-02-09 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Michał, Michał Górny writes: > So it seems that upstream has practically closed the discussion, > and the short summary is that they only care for the 'majority' of > users, they don't care for minor platforms (but we're free to port > LLVM/Rust to them) and -- unsurprisingly -- this is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] A script to pick next free UID/GID for your acct-* packages

2021-02-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 2:23 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > >> Mh - so the obvious first feature request for the script is to also > >> output Free UID+GID pairs. Counting them manually in your screenshot > >> I get 36. > >> > >> That's not a whole

Re: [gentoo-dev] A script to pick next free UID/GID for your acct-* packages

2021-02-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2021, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> Mh - so the obvious first feature request for the script is to also >> output Free UID+GID pairs. Counting them manually in your screenshot >> I get 36. >> >> That's not a whole lot; just 7% of 500. > The output was abbreviated. Here is the full

Re: [gentoo-dev] A script to pick next free UID/GID for your acct-* packages

2021-02-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:51 PM Peter Stuge wrote: > > Joonas Niilola wrote: > > There's a script by jkroon in data/api.git > > (https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/api.git/) that prints the next available > > UID/GID pair for new acct-* packages. > > This is super nice! Thanks a lot jkroon! > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] A script to pick next free UID/GID for your acct-* packages

2021-02-09 Thread Peter Stuge
Joonas Niilola wrote: > There's a script by jkroon in data/api.git > (https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/api.git/) that prints the next available > UID/GID pair for new acct-* packages. This is super nice! Thanks a lot jkroon! > It is not forbidden to mix and mash UID/GID between different

[gentoo-dev] A script to pick next free UID/GID for your acct-* packages

2021-02-09 Thread Joonas Niilola
Hey all, Summary: There's a script by jkroon in data/api.git (https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/api.git/) that prints the next available UID/GID pair for new acct-* packages. You can use it by:   cd ~/git/gentoo/data/api   git pull   sh bin/used_free_uidgids.sh     The outcome looks like this for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-cdr/iat, dev-util/flawfinder

2021-02-09 Thread Alfredo Tupone
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:25:28 +0200 Joonas Niilola wrote: > Packages up for grabs due to retirement of a proxied maintainer: > dev-util/flawfinder (outdated) I take this Alfredo

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/cryptography to use rust, effectively killing alpha, hppa, ia64, m68k, s390

2021-02-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 12:19 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going > to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to > provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions. > > Since cryptography is a