# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# Fails to build with GCC 11. No activity upstream.
# Removal on 2021-08-26. bug #740536, bug #624746.
media-sound/tapestrea
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# Fails to build with GCC 11.
# Removal on 2021-08-26. bug #788577.
net-im/minbif
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# Rather out of date, several open bugs, fails to build with GCC 11.
# Removal in 2021-08-26.
# bug #793020, bug #692976, bug #741600, bug #703948, bug #674334.
sci-misc/tango
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# No activity upstream. No reverse dependencies (library).
# Fails to build with GCC 11.
# Removal on 2021-08-26. bug #787113, bug #735714, bug #657510.
dev-cpp/libxsd-frontend
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-07-25)
# No activity upstream since 2014. Fails to build with GCC 11.
# Only one reverse dependency (media-libs/openexr_ctl) which
# is uninstallable.
# Removal on 2021-08-25. bug #789792, bug #715298.
media-libs/ctl
media-libs/openexr_ctl
signature.asc
Description: Message
# John Helmert III (2021-07-26)
# Open security bug, service backing it seems to be dead, making these
# packages useless. Old EAPIs. Removal on 2021-08-26. Bug #630814
app-portage/getdelta
app-portage/deltup
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
# John Helmert III (2021-07-26)
# Maintained needed, open security bug, uninterested upstream.
# No revdeps. Removal on 2021-08-26. Bug #752408.
app-text/lout
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Sam James wrote:
> > https://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/2020-August/003404.html
> >
> > it seems that it may be possible to need only very simple tools for the
> > deblob program(s).
>
> Instead of linking to a huge release announcement, could you summarise it?
Fair enough - though the
On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 01:11 +, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Marco Scardovi wrote:
> > mail-filter/bogofilter
>
> I'd like to proxy-maintain this.
>
>
> //Peter
>
We tend to prefer people contribute fixes before adopting. Furthermore,
given that you were retired for inactivity (#633142), and I
> On 22 Jul 2021, at 16:00, Alice wrote:
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ferrazzi
> ---
> eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 13 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Alice, thanks for taking the initiative to get this done and drop Python 2.7
here.
It's much appreciated!
>
>
> On 25 Jul 2021, at 23:10, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> Alice wrote:
>> +++ b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
> ..
>> - PYTHON_COMPAT=( python2_7 )
>> + PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_{7..10} )
>
> From
>
>
# David Seifert (2021-07-26)
# Fails to build with GCC 11, terrible codebase, tests fail with
# modern ImageMagick, last release over 12 years ago.
# Bug #725436, #786915, removal in 30 days.
sci-electronics/drawtiming
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Alice wrote:
> +++ b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
..
> - PYTHON_COMPAT=( python2_7 )
> + PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_{7..10} )
From
https://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/2020-August/003404.html
it seems that it may be possible to need only very simple
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 11:23 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> We can reiterate when there are indications that SHA512 would be broken.
> (Then again, the same applies to BLAKE2B.)
Unless both are broken at the same time you'd also have the advantage
of not having to try to scramble to figure out
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021, Roy Bamford wrote:
> I'm in the "if it's not broken don't fix it" school.
+1
I don't see a strong argument to remove SHA512, so leave things as they
are for now.
We can reiterate when there are indications that SHA512 would be broken.
(Then again, the same applies to
On 24/07/21 17:16, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I've been asked to repost the idea of removing SHA512 hash from
> Manifests, effectively limiting them to BLAKE2B.
>
> The 'old' set of Gentoo hashes including SHA512 went live in July 2012.
> In November 2017, we have decided to remove
Am Samstag, 24. Juli 2021, 17:16:23 CEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I've been asked to repost the idea of removing SHA512 hash from
> Manifests, effectively limiting them to BLAKE2B.
Just keep things as they are for now.
Even reading this bike^H^H^H^Hthread is more effort than
Hello!
I created a Gentoo overlay [1] with auto-generated ebuilds from the
Racket packages catalog [2], using a tool I wrote - collector2 [3].
But most importantly I added, to the overlay, a ebuild with some fixes
for dev-scheme/racket [4]
and documented [5] the changes (see section
On 2021.07.25 00:12, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand. Isn't it the same motion we put down just 2 months
>
> ago [1]? Or is this something new?
>
> If this isn't something new, what has changed since May [2]?
>
> To remember: Currently we have two different hashes for
Hi,
Back during the 2017 discussion, Infra came to the conclusion that we're
going to keep SHA512 for a transition period, then remove it, and stay
with a single hash algorithm. In my opinion, we have kept it long
enough.
WDYT?
As far I remember we agreed to keep two different hashes.
The
On 24/07/2021 16:16, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I've been asked to repost the idea of removing SHA512 hash from
Manifests, effectively limiting them to BLAKE2B.
The 'old' set of Gentoo hashes including SHA512 went live in July 2012.
In November 2017, we have decided to remove the two
# Michał Górny (2021-07-25)
# Conflicts with dev-python/pyxdg. Upstream is unwilling to resolve
# this. The only revdep has been patched to use pyxdg.
# Removal on 2021-08-24. Bug #804127.
dev-python/xdg
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
On 7/24/21 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Back during the 2017 discussion, Infra came to the conclusion that we're
going to keep SHA512 for a transition period, then remove it, and stay
with a single hash algorithm.
I'm just curious if Infra in 2021 still wants only 1 hash algo?
In my
On Sun, 2021-07-25 at 01:12 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand. Isn't it the same motion we put down just 2 months
> ago [1]? Or is this something new?
>
> If this isn't something new, what has changed since May [2]?
Apparently it has not been 'put down' because it
On Sat, 2021-07-24 at 17:15 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 7/24/2021 11:16, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > I've been asked to repost the idea of removing SHA512 hash from
> > Manifests, effectively limiting them to BLAKE2B.
> >
> > The 'old' set of Gentoo hashes including SHA512
25 matches
Mail list logo
