If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they are the contact for any problems/troubles.
Thank you for adding it to #gentoo-dev.
Please also add to #gentoo-devrel and
2) Continued presence of forcefully retired devs It really baffles me that
some developers are forcefully retired for anti-social behavior, but are
not consequently banned from the places where they display this behavior,
such as our MLs and IRC channels. What good is it to retire developers,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a maintainer and I'll say right out that I won't fix things
unless they make sense to me; regardless of what some council says.
Then I'd imagine devrel would have to step in.
I highly doubt that would happen unless
Fair enough. Let me wrap up the IRC part.
1. I'd like to ask Council to discuss possible reactions to our
developer being banned from Freenode without providing us with a
reason. The situation looks like one of Freenode staffers overreacted
over something Chris said during previous Council
Whats this for? It sounds interest.
Kind regards,
Christina Fullam
Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations
-Original Message-
From: Robin H. Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:26 AM
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Chrissy Fullam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats this for? It sounds interest.
Here's the output of `fortune gentoo-dev -m robbat2`:
http://pastebin.osuosl.org/8802
Definitely of interest ;) The last fortune-mod-gentoo-dev set was
Saturday 28 July 2007
Except you'd rather veto the ones you don't like. Hehe... It must
suck being
you, wanting to veto people and not being able to do it :)
I trust the masses to do the sensible thing and not vote for people
who'd be bad for the project. Hopefully that means we get the Council
from last
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
How to gain power the easy way and obsolete conflict resolution in just
one commit:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/devrel/poli
cy.xml?r1=1.18r2=1.19
Neither Developer Relations as a whole or myself as the Lead acts without a
system for
Petteri Räty wrote:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
Petteri Räty wrote:
I checked the current slacker script and it checks for having at least one
commit in last 60 days. We could of course just change the slacker script
to list the activity for everyone during the last 60 days and leave the
interpretation to undertakers.
Interesting
I thought we had learnt something about not communicating with our userbase,
but
it looks like this lesson has already been forgotten. While I appreciate there
probably are valid reasons for the delay of the beta and the release of
2008.0,
I don't think there is any excuse not to update
We've seen a lot of change in Gentoo recently and the Developer Relations
team is no exception. We have reviewed our policy for the resolution of
conflicts, found it to be in need of improvement, and have taken this
opportunity to reorganize ourselves, as well. The Conflict Resolution
project has
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to bring up an issue with Developer Relations. They'll
likely throw it out because YOU ARE NOT A DEVELOPER. Also, you'll
notice that rather than call you names, which is really
your forte, I
have instead
Ferris McCormick wrote:
With all due respect, for some reason we don't have Proctors
anymore to enforce the CoC. Thus, things we would expect the
proctors to catch and handle under CoC get sent to devrel
instead. All I am doing is wondering out loud (now that CoC
is coming alive again)
Ferris McCormick wrote:
they get to devrel because you ensured there would be no one to
catch them --- you are the one who wanted to kill off the
proctors, after all.
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
...and the finger-pointing starts... Bravo!
Ferris McCormick wrote:
To the extent
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 09-01-2008 13:03:13 -0800, Chrissy Fullam wrote:
You have a negative history with wolf31o2, and the details of which
quite frankly should be kept off this mailing list. ...
Let's take this discussion elsewhere.
IMHO, you have a very big conflict of interest
Ferris McCormick wrote:
As always, I'd like a status report on Code of Conduct, with
three questions in mind:
1) Do we have an implementation schedule?
It is already being enforced by a variety of teams as they find it
applicable.
2) Have we identified some warm bodies for it?
Good
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The
complete log will show up at
snip
- The CoC is in effect, but it needs a new enforcement section since the
proctors were disbanded. The council is sending discussion of this to
the gentoo-project list, to come
From: Ferris McCormick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October
Substantive
---
It is not clear whether or not Gentoo currently has a Code of
Conduct or even if the Council wishes it to.
(1) whether the Code of Conduct is
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Hill
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last Rites - August 27th -
September 2nd 2007
If you like I can regenerate the list with them included, but
I don't plan on doing version-specific masks in the future
unless someone can come up with a
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duncan
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Version Formatting Issues
It's considered inappropriate for this list, which is
primarily for discussion of official Gentoo development
technical issues and policy, with an eye toward the fact that
it's a
From: Josh Saddler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meanwhile, I'll continue making a difference within Gentoo by
doing documentation for any and all interested parties, and
anything else I can contribute to, like the GWN. It's not
council work, but I'll continue to try to make Gentoo better
Roy Bamford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007.07.21 10:47, Peter Weller wrote:
My main plans over the next few years would be to improve
communications (and (more importantly?) openness), not just between
developers, but also between herds, users, the Council, the Trustees,
upstream and
Send an email to this address to be removed from the mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For your reference, and for any additional Gentoo lists you may be on, I
have included the following link for further information:
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
Kind regards,
Christina Fullam
Gentoo
Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far the CoC is concerned, i'm not sure what the current status is
and if anyone is supposed to enforce it atm (devrel? userrel?).
I am sure not devrel. That's one reason we had proctors to begin
with.
Could we try to keep this thread, and all the similarly named ones, on
topic? The pointing fingers, trash talking, etc is not furthering anything.
If you don't like councils opinion, or someone elses opinion, well respect
them enough to allow them their own opinion.
The real topic at hand is about
The -project mailing list ... is a required list for a dev to join.
Sorry, NOT a required list for devs to join.
Kind regards,
Christina Fullam
Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | GWN Author
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 7/12/07, Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All-
We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to
where only devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post.
devs who moderate in bad posts will be subject to moderation
themselves. in addition the
-Original Message-
From: Wernfried Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:35:20AM +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
No matter how hard I try fighting for what I feel is right we seem to
end up with petty fights, flamewars or what I consider even worse -
people simply
would be what do we do to start
working with this decision?
Regards,
Chrissy Fullam
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 11:52 +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
So please welcome Christina as a new fellow developer among us !
Thank you for the greetings!
agaffney - good luck with that hazing thing and don't you have some liveCD
stuff to work on? :-P
Regards,
Chrissy Fullam
--
[EMAIL
31 matches
Mail list logo
