On 21-10-2008 16:09:12 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
As Gentoo Solaris would not be the same as Gentoo Prefix on Solaris,
it should not share the *-solaris keywords used for Prefix via the same
KEYWORDS-setting.
what about a new generic schema like: CPU-OS[-prefix] with the possibility
of
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 19:59 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 13-10-2008 15:27:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:01 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd
go with that. It's a /classic/ usage
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:01 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd
go with that. It's a /classic/ usage of that variable, as it's simply
a boolean; PROPERTIES is well-defined and I'm hoping all the manglers
support it.
On 13-10-2008 15:27:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:01 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd
go with that. It's a /classic/ usage of that variable, as it's simply
a boolean; PROPERTIES is
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
snip
Most notably, in Prefix all keywords are full GLEP53 style, which
results in e.g. amd64-linux. We did this on purpose, because in Prefix
we don't necessarily are on Gentoo Linux. We also chose to expand fbsd,
nbsd and obsd to their long
On 10-10-2008 04:21:23 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
amd64-linux
x64-openbsd
x64-solaris
Is there a special reason why you're using x64 instead of amd64
in those cases? (IMO x64 is the most stupid name for the x86_64
architecture)
AFAIK, that's not amd64/x86_64, but
On 10-10-2008 14:40:13 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- x64 is what the vendors (Apple, Sun) advertise themselves
Err I'm sure I haven't seen any x64 in the documentation or
advertisement of my MacBook Pro, are you sure _Apple_ uses that
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- x64 is what the vendors (Apple, Sun) advertise themselves
Err I'm sure I haven't seen any x64 in the documentation or
advertisement of my MacBook Pro, are you sure _Apple_ uses that totally
bogus name?
Anyway, em64t might be better, but then again
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:15:16 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, x64 is the marketing name Microsoft made up for x86_64 (aka
amd64, ia32e and Intel 64), as Windows for x86_64 doesn't sound
that sexy, and was later adopted by Sun and others.
ia64/Itanium doesn't have any
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever. Some of you seem to have some quite agressive dislikement
to it. In the end it's just a name/tag. I guess I could live with
anything, including c3p0.
Well, while I dislike x64 I'm more concerned about
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:56:37 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever. Some of you seem to have some quite agressive dislikement
to it. In the end it's just a name/tag. I guess I could live with
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 10
Oct 2008 00:05:00 +0200:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amd64-linux
x64-openbsd
x64-solaris
Is there a special reason why you're using x64
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:16:10 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
10 Oct 2008 00:05:00 +0200:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amd64-linux
13 matches
Mail list logo
