[gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Sylvain Alain
Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. I saw on the forum this thread : https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-934678-highlight-.html and maybe it could be part of a solution to have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Alain d2racing...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. There is not. But thanks for starting the flamewar just the same.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 28/08/12 11:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Alain d2racing...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/28/2012 10:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote: Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. I saw on the forum this thread : https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-934678-highlight-.html and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Jeff Horelick
On 28 August 2012 12:59, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/28/2012 10:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote: Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. I saw on the forum this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jeff Horelick jdh...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this issue is currently in far too murky of a state to get any well-informed issue from the council. Perhaps when the issues get hammered out a bit more, but not currently. I tend to agree. Taking a position for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Luca Barbato
On 08/28/2012 05:35 PM, Sylvain Alain wrote: Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. udev might or might not eventually get forked to avoid systemd borg-approach. mdev works fine for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Ben de Groot
On 29 August 2012 01:36, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/28/2012 05:35 PM, Sylvain Alain wrote: Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. udev might or might not eventually