On 03/06/10 23:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
_filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
Without this, things like -Wl,-O1,--as-needed won't be affected by any
kind of
On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
On 03/06/10 23:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
_filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
Without this, things like
On 03/07/10 14:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
[snip]
The commas are only added when there's LDFLAGS being changed.
you missed my point. read the whole eclass -- this function isnt only used
on
LDFLAGS. your patch opens the door to
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:59:25 ChIIph wrote:
On 03/07/10 14:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
[snip]
The commas are only added when there's LDFLAGS being changed.
you missed my point. read the whole eclass -- this function isnt only
used on
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
_filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
Without this, things like -Wl,-O1,--as-needed won't be affected by any
kind of filter since there are no spaces to separate each
Hello everyone,
Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
_filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
Without this, things like -Wl,-O1,--as-needed won't be affected by any
kind of filter since there are no spaces to separate each flag.
I don't know of any better way to
