Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo identification in Primary Volume Descriptor of ISOs

On 5/3/24 4:43 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > Awesome! Thank you. > > And speaking of things that slip our attention. When trying to get a > link to this e-mail thread I've noticed at least gentoo-dev archives on > archives.gentoo.org are stuck in 2023: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo identification in Primary Volume Descriptor of ISOs

On 5/2/24 22:48, Ben Kohler wrote: > > On 5/2/24 06:15, Michal Prívozník wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've noticed (thanks to an issue reported against Libvirt [1]), that >> neither minimal installation ISO nor liveGUI ISO contain anything inside >> their Primary Volume Descriptors that would hint the ISO

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo identification in Primary Volume Descriptor of ISOs

On 5/2/24 06:15, Michal Prívozník wrote: Hi, I've noticed (thanks to an issue reported against Libvirt [1]), that neither minimal installation ISO nor liveGUI ISO contain anything inside their Primary Volume Descriptors that would hint the ISO contains Gentoo. This is unfortunate a bit,

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo identification in Primary Volume Descriptor of ISOs

Hi, I've noticed (thanks to an issue reported against Libvirt [1]), that neither minimal installation ISO nor liveGUI ISO contain anything inside their Primary Volume Descriptors that would hint the ISO contains Gentoo. This is unfortunate a bit, because matching VolumeID is exactly how tools

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Services Migration: Bugzilla, Forums, Wiki

Hi! This is a notification that multiple Gentoo services (bugzilla, forums, wiki) will be moving and temporarily offline possibly until sometime Saturday 2023/04/01. We're aiming to keep the interruption much shorter, but the backup plan is a 3-4 day outage. Forums may have the longest outage,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo - Google Summer of Code (GSoC)

Dear Yury, Yury German writes: > I am trying to follow up and see if anyone is interested in becoming a > mentor. > > This is the last request I am sending as so far we only have two > people willing to mentor and it is project dependent. > > Do we have any other volunteers as I want to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo - Google Summer of Code (GSoC)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 08:33:35AM -0500, Yury German wrote: > 2. Mentors.- Last year we got four slots allocated to us by Google and > ran a successful project, we are looking for mentors to be able to > help mentor the applicants, and run the projects. Yes, I'm willing to help mentor. I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo - Google Summer of Code (GSoC)

On Sat, Feb 4, 2023, 18:10 Yury German wrote: > Hello All, > > I am trying to follow up and see if anyone is interested in becoming a > mentor. > > This is the last request I am sending as so far we only have two people > willing to mentor and it is project dependent. > > Do we have any other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo - Google Summer of Code (GSoC)

Hello All, I am trying to follow up and see if anyone is interested in becoming a mentor. This is the last request I am sending as so far we only have two people willing to mentor and it is project dependent. Do we have any other volunteers as I want to make sure that we have a few mentors

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo - Google Summer of Code (GSoC)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:33 AM Yury German wrote: > > Hello All, > > The registration period for Google Summer of Code is coming up soon. To > continue on with running Gentoo Summer of Code we need some assistance with > the project. > > The following roles are needed: > > 1. Admin Role - To

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo - Google Summer of Code (GSoC)

Hello All, The registration period for Google Summer of Code is coming up soon. To continue on with running Gentoo Summer of Code we need some assistance with the project. The following roles are needed: 1. Admin Role - To help run the project I need co-admins to help run the project.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

On 05/01/2023 12:09, m1027 wrote: frederik.pfautsch: > >>> So, ideally, there is c): In a hypothetic case we would prepare a >>> entire OS incl. our app (maybe via catalyst?) which would require >>> a bootloader-like mini-OS on the customer's side, to receive >>> updates over the internet,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

frederik.pfautsch: > > So, ideally, there is c): In a hypothetic case we would prepare > > a entire OS incl. our app (maybe via catalyst?) which would > > require a bootloader-like mini-OS on the customer's side, to > > receive updates over the internet, switch the OS at boot time, > > and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

peter: > > Whenever we need to deliver a updated app to customers whose OS is > > too old (but updating it is too risky), we could either > > a) keep evenly outdated dev build OSes around forever (oh no!), or > > b) post our newly built app in a container (leaving the lovely native > > world);

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

m1027 wrote: > Wow, wasn't aware of catalyst at all. What a beast in terms of control. It's not so well-known maybe because it was created by and for gentoo-releng but if you know what you want it's a fantastic tool. > (FYI: I enjoyed the links on catalyst you sent me directly. > Unfortunatelly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

Hi, On Mon 02 Jan 2023 23:31:17 GMT, m1027 wrote: > I am not complaining here. Hey, we are on rolling release. Some of > you may even know individual solutions to work around each of it. > However, we just may get into trouble when distributing newly > compiled apps (on new Gentoo systems) to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

Am 04.01.23 um 23:00 schrieb m1027: Wow, wasn't aware of catalyst at all. What a beast in terms of control. (FYI: I enjoyed the links on catalyst you sent me directly. Unfortunatelly I cannot answer you directly due to the default TLS guarantee kicked in by my provider: "TLS is required, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

peter: > Peter Stuge wrote: > > Essentially you will be maintaining a private fork of gentoo.git, > > If this seems too heavy handed then you can just as well do the reverse: > > Maintain an overlay repo with the packages you care to control in the > state you care to have them, set that in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 4:55 PM m1027 wrote: > > Many thanks for your detailed thoughs for sharing the rich > experiences on this! See below: > > antarus: > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM m1027 wrote: > > > > > > Hi and happy new year. > > > > > > When we create apps on Gentoo they become

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

Many thanks for your detailed thoughs for sharing the rich experiences on this! See below: antarus: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM m1027 wrote: > > > > Hi and happy new year. > > > > When we create apps on Gentoo they become easily incompatible for > > older Gentoo systems in production where

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

sam: > > On 2 Jan 2023, at 12:48, m1027 wrote: > > > > Hi and happy new year. > > > > When we create apps on Gentoo they become easily incompatible for > > older Gentoo systems in production where unattended remote world > > updates are risky. This is due to new glibc, openssl-3 etc. [...] >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM m1027 wrote: > > Hi and happy new year. > > When we create apps on Gentoo they become easily incompatible for > older Gentoo systems in production where unattended remote world > updates are risky. This is due to new glibc, openssl-3 etc. I wrote a very long reply,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

Peter Stuge wrote: > Essentially you will be maintaining a private fork of gentoo.git, If this seems too heavy handed then you can just as well do the reverse: Maintain an overlay repo with the packages you care to control in the state you care to have them, set that in the catalyst stage4.spec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

Hi, m1027 wrote: > So, what we've thought of so far is: > > (1) Keeping outdated developer boxes around and compile there. We > would freeze portage against accidental emerge sync by creating a > git branch in /var/db/repos/gentoo. This feels hacky and requires a > increating number of develper

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

> On 2 Jan 2023, at 12:48, m1027 wrote: > > Hi and happy new year. > > When we create apps on Gentoo they become easily incompatible for > older Gentoo systems in production where unattended remote world > updates are risky. This is due to new glibc, openssl-3 etc. > > So, what we've thought

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 12:48 +, m1027 wrote: > Hi and happy new year. > > When we create apps on Gentoo they become easily incompatible for > older Gentoo systems in production where unattended remote world > updates are risky. This is due to new glibc, openssl-3 etc. > Just update them.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 7:48 AM m1027 wrote: > > When we create apps on Gentoo they become easily incompatible for > older Gentoo systems in production where unattended remote world > updates are risky. This is due to new glibc, openssl-3 etc. So, unless you're proposing some improvement this

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo LTS or: proper backward compatibility?

Hi and happy new year. When we create apps on Gentoo they become easily incompatible for older Gentoo systems in production where unattended remote world updates are risky. This is due to new glibc, openssl-3 etc. So, what we've thought of so far is: (1) Keeping outdated developer boxes around

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Summer of Code

Hello All, The projects that the contributors along with a group of mentors will be working on are: - musl support expansion (focusing on KDE) - musl support expansion (focusing on GNOME) - RISC-V support for Gentoo Prefix - Refining ROCm Packages in Gentoo As part of the introduction to the

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-list] Add rakudo.eclass and dev-raku packages from my overlay.

https://codeberg.org/amano.kenji/gentoo-overlay is already submitted as a pull request to https://github.com/gentoo/api-gentoo-org repository. If you look into my overlay, you will find eclass/rakudo.eclass, profiles/thirdpartymirros, and dev-raku. Some dev-raku packages depend on zef mirror.

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Vim needs your help!

Hi! I'm the only maintainer left within the Gentoo Vim Project [1] and would need some help to maintain the vim editor along with the app-vim/ category. vim and vim packages are low-maintenance: a version bump here, a security fix there. vim ebuilds aren't that complicated. vim eclasses have to

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Google Summer of Code Update

Hello All, I wanted to provide an update on the released news about Gentoo being selected as part of the Google Summer of Code or GSoC for another year. We have a core group of admins and mentors who are working on talking to the students and making project recommendations. The application

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 00:36 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > 6. Work on setting up and configuring a buildbot for Gentoo LLVM builds. > This is some effort and I don't have the time to learn how to do that. > You'll probably need to set up a local instance and figure out how to > set our builds

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

Michał Górny writes: >> > 6. Work on setting up and configuring a buildbot for Gentoo LLVM builds. >> > This is some effort and I don't have the time to learn how to do that. >> > You'll probably need to set up a local instance and figure out how to >> > set our builds before submitting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:11:51PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > GSOC-worthy project? > Not sure. To rephrase what was once said to me, this is summer of > *code*, not infra work. Are there similar programs where the infra work might fit? Outreachy? paid interns? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 21:19 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 11.2.2022 1.36, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself. > > This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm > > pretty close to burnout. I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

On 11.2.2022 1.36, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself. > This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm > pretty close to burnout. I'd really appreciate some help. > > The problem with LLVM that it's a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 09:40 -0800, A Schenck wrote: > On 2/10/22 15:36, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself. > > This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm > > pretty close to burnout. I'd really

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

On 2/10/22 15:36, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself. > This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm > pretty close to burnout. I'd really appreciate some help. > > The problem with LLVM that it's a really

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

Hi, As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself. This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm pretty close to burnout. I'd really appreciate some help. The problem with LLVM that it's a really huge, rapidly moving forward (and breaking

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: app-text/tidy-html5

# Patrice Clement (2021-10-09) # Obsolete and unmaintained. Please switch to app-text/htmltidy. # Bug #564884. Masked for removal in 30 days. app-text/tidy-html5

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

Great idea and happy anniversary! :) Roy Bamford wrote: > Here's where I reed your help. I can't help with that. Roy Bamford wrote: > I have a similar media problem with a pile of 5 1/4" floppies. A have a > drive that reads all the 5 1/4" formats and a motherboard to connect it > to ...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

On 20/04/2021 06:31, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Here's two I have so far https://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/neddy/ On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:24:41AM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: Here's where I reed your help. The missing distfiles are MD5 38adc94a4953a6b29e8619c25dda4887 4.2.0-4.2.1.diff.gz 54763 MD5

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

Here's two I have so far https://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/neddy/ On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:24:41AM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: > Here's where I reed your help. The missing distfiles are > MD5 38adc94a4953a6b29e8619c25dda4887 4.2.0-4.2.1.diff.gz 54763 > MD5 d5cc6a93c7d3ad2eb02bc637a1de9cf3

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

On 20/4/21 4:14 am, Philip Webb wrote: > 210419 Roy Bamford wrote: >> Its my 18th anniversary of installing Gentoo. > You beat me by 6 mth . I had recently built my 2nd machine > & had been using Mandrake in the 1st, but they were slow with their release. > I tried Suse + Slackware, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

210419 Roy Bamford wrote: > Its my 18th anniversary of installing Gentoo. You beat me by 6 mth . I had recently built my 2nd machine & had been using Mandrake in the 1st, but they were slow with their release. I tried Suse + Slackware, but couldn't get them set up properly, so I thought I might

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

On 19/04/2021 15:55, Benda Xu wrote: Roy, Roy Bamford writes: Its my 18th anniversary of installing Gentoo. A number of coincidences gave rise to my original liveCD turning up when I was searching for bits to get an old system to boot just one more time to get some forgotten data off its

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

Roy, Roy Bamford writes: > Its my 18th anniversary of installing Gentoo. A number of coincidences gave > rise to > my original liveCD turning up when I was searching for bits to get an old > system to boot > just one more time to get some forgotten data off its hard drives. I just had > to

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo 18th Anniversary Edition - Help Needed

Team, Its my 18th anniversary of installing Gentoo. A number of coincidences gave rise to my original liveCD turning up when I was searching for bits to get an old system to boot just one more time to get some forgotten data off its hard drives. I just had to try it out. Anyway, one thing

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo kernel hardening

Please consider reviewing and possibly merging this https://github.com/anthraxx/linux-hardened. Also consider reviewing this https://github.com/Whonix/hardened-kernel. Documentation is here https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Hardened-kernel. This is still experimental though. But it could be added in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Foundations Trustee Election 2020 - Election Team Formation

On 2020.06.17 10:40, David Abbott wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:08 AM Roy Bamford > wrote: > > > > Team, > > > > Its time to kick off the Trustee Election for this year. > > > > It will span June 21 to about August 3. > > We need two or three election officials and an infra contact to >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Foundations Trustee Election 2020 - Election Team Formation

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:08 AM Roy Bamford wrote: > > Team, > > Its time to kick off the Trustee Election for this year. > > It will span June 21 to about August 3. > We need two or three election officials and an infra contact to staff this > election. > > If you will be available and have a

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Foundations Trustee Election 2020 - Election Team Formation

Team, Its time to kick off the Trustee Election for this year. It will span June 21 to about August 3. We need two or three election officials and an infra contact to staff this election. If you will be available and have a little free time in that period recruiting is now open. Potential

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo/OpenBSD current status

On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:54:44 + (UTC) "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > > Benda Xu wrote: > > > > I was wondering if the openbsd prefix support is something > > > > that is still garnering any interest from gentoo? > > > > There is still interest in Gentoo. But no one seems to have energy to >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo/OpenBSD current status

> Benda Xu wrote: > > > I was wondering if the openbsd prefix support is something > > > that is still garnering any interest from gentoo? > > There is still interest in Gentoo. But no one seems to have energy to > > take care of it. > FWIW I have interest in this as well. > > Your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo/OpenBSD current status

On 6/1/20 4:19 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Benda Xu wrote: >>> I was wondering if the openbsd prefix support is something >>> that is still garnering any interest from gentoo? >> >> There is still interest in Gentoo. But no one seems to have energy to >> take care of it. > > FWIW I have interest in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo/OpenBSD current status

Benda Xu wrote: > > I was wondering if the openbsd prefix support is something > > that is still garnering any interest from gentoo? > > There is still interest in Gentoo. But no one seems to have energy to > take care of it. FWIW I have interest in this as well. > Your contribution is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo/OpenBSD current status

Aisha Tammy writes: > I've been trying to play around with the prefix and reading the > code. Basically trying to get it to work for my system. I've not > managed to get even a small headstart and am quite lost to say the > least. I was wondering if the openbsd prefix support is something >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Election 2020 - Call For Election Officials

On 2020.05.30 13:14, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 6:09 AM Roy Bamford > wrote: > > > > We sill need more volunteers. > > > > Not going to be running, so I'm happy to pitch in. > > -- > Rich > > > Rich, Thank you. -- Regards, Roy Bamford (Neddyseagoon) a member of

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo/OpenBSD current status

Hi maksbotan and other devs, I've been trying to play around with the prefix and reading the code. Basically trying to get it to work for my system. I've not managed to get even a small headstart and am quite lost to say the least. I was wondering if the openbsd prefix support is something

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Election 2020 - Call For Election Officials

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 6:09 AM Roy Bamford wrote: > > We sill need more volunteers. > Not going to be running, so I'm happy to pitch in. -- Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Election 2020 - Call For Election Officials

On 2020.05.29 21:10, David Abbott wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:03 PM Roy Bamford > wrote: > > > > Team, > > > > Our current council will hold their last meeting on 14-Jun-20. > > We therefore need to elect a new council before the July meeting. > > > > To do this, I'm calling for three

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Election 2020 - Call For Election Officials

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:03 PM Roy Bamford wrote: > > Team, > > Our current council will hold their last meeting on 14-Jun-20. > We therefore need to elect a new council before the July meeting. > > To do this, I'm calling for three volunteers to be election officials and an > infra member to be

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Election 2020 - Call For Election Officials

Team, Our current council will hold their last meeting on 14-Jun-20. We therefore need to elect a new council before the July meeting. To do this, I'm calling for three volunteers to be election officials and an infra member to be the infra contact. The timeline, still exactly to be determined

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo clang team

Hi Sam, Thanks for your reply I've seen project LLVM but I was concerned it is about porting LLVM to Gentoo, not about making Gentoo LLVM/Clang - compatible. There even was no such thing in their TODO list. Anyway, thanks. I'll try reach them. вт, 12 мая 2020 г. в 15:51, Sam James : > > On 12

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo clang team

> On 12 May 2020, at 14:48, Alexander Bilyak wrote: > > Hello everyone in this mailing list. > > I apologize for myself as I am not sure if it is the right place to write, > but anyway... > I am the (only) maintainer of gentoo-clang > overlay. >

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo clang team

Hello everyone in this mailing list. I apologize for myself as I am not sure if it is the right place to write, but anyway... I am the (only) maintainer of gentoo-clang overlay. Recently I've found this bug (#408963) . So I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-java][PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development

Hi Benda, I'm sorry, but maybe I miss something after reading the documentation... I only check java and ant build system. My point is about other JVM languages such as scala, groovy, kotlin, clojure, ... And about builders such as gradle or sbt? I think that eclasses for those would be very

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-java][PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development

Hi Samuel, Samuel Bernardo writes: > I send this email to mention that it seems to be missing eclasses for > JVM builders such as those I mention in this email subject. Dependencies > and tasks management are hard tasks now that I think to have great scope > for improvement. Have you read the

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-java][PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development

Dear Java team, I send this email to mention that it seems to be missing eclasses for JVM builders such as those I mention in this email subject. Dependencies and tasks management are hard tasks now that I think to have great scope for improvement. Looking into the developments made in go

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Package up for grabs: app-office/calcurse

The following package is now up for grabs: app-office/calcurse It needs a bit of care and I don't have time to maintain it properly. See #712126. -- Patrice Clement Gentoo Linux developer http://www.gentoo.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo CI news: pkgcheck is now running truly parallel

Hi, Just a quick note: thanks to hard work of radhermit, the newest release of pkgcheck features internal parallelization of checks. While it's not perfect and there's still room for improvement (I mean, it could run even faster!), it's a major step forward. This means that I've finally retired

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: net-irc/irssi-otr

# Patrice Clement (2019-10-02) # OTR support is fully integrated within irssi since version 1.2.0. Type /help otr # at the command prompt to find out more. The OTR module is therefore obsolete # and can be tree-cleaned. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #696074. net-irc/irssi-otr -- Patrice

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Package up for grabs: net-im/mattermost-desktop-bin

Hi net-im/mattermost-desktop-bin is now up for grabs. Thanks. -- Patrice Clement Gentoo Linux developer http://www.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

Dnia July 26, 2019 5:17:31 AM UTC, Georgy Yakovlev napisał(a): >On Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:05:16 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci. >> >> Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports. So now >> the default report seen at [1] is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

On Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:05:16 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci. > > Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports. So now > the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody wants > all the details at [2]. > This is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:05:16 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Thirdly, I've implemented filtering by maintainer. > > To get reports for developer foo, append ';maintainer=foo', e.g.: Thanks very much :). This will come in *very* handy for me :) pgp_LVJov6dDk.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

Hi, Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci. Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports. So now the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody wants all the details at [2]. Secondly, the reports now explicitly list maintainers for the reported packages.

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-ci outage

Hi, people. Since ~10 AM UTC today gentoo-ci does not work, so please take special care not to break stuff. So far I haven't been able to figure out what's wrong, and I can't put as much time into debugging it as I wish I could. If anyone would like to help, feel free to ping me. The last

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: media-tv/tvbrowser

# Patrice Clement (06 May 2019) # Broken build. Outdated version. No interest from the Java team to maintain # it. Removal in 30 days. Bug #581720. media-tv/tvbrowser -- Patrice Clement Gentoo Linux developer http://www.gentoo.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 19-04-30 13:43:31, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:22 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > > It matters if things are perceived as official Gentoo and causing a > > negative reputation as in the article in this thread. One some level > > that actually goes to trademark

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 19-04-30 17:36:46, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 07:24:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:22 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > It matters if things are perceived as official Gentoo and causing a > negative reputation as in the article in this thread. One some level > that actually goes to trademark infringement that should be of interest > to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 4/30/19 7:32 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > One thing that may help is to have multiple levels of control defined. Indeed, this distinction is interesting. -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 07:24:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 4/30/19 7:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> I've contacted the author and the author refused to change it. >>> The claim is that 'PR team runs it', '8 Gentoo developers have admin >>> rights', 'i.e. it is sanctioned by the project itself'. I was suggested >>> that if it's not official, we should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 19-04-30 19:24:45, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 4/30/19 7:17 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > >> In this article on chat services used for OSS: >> >> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ >> >> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> In this article on chat services used for OSS: >> >> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ >> >> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ > > I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord > as an official method of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ > > I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord > as an official method of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 4/30/19 6:55 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Probably what it is - social media under PR admin. Do you > consider facebook as official communication medium too? No, Facebook is definitely not an official communication medium. However you might argue that a given Facebook Page is official if it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 30.04.2019 kell 18:17, kirjutas Kristian Fiskerstrand: > On 4/30/19 6:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 4/30/19 9:05 AM, Cynede wrote: > > > Right, alike reddit, twitter, facebook and other PR channels. > > > It's > > > "official" because it's controlled by PR Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 4/30/19 6:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 4/30/19 9:05 AM, Cynede wrote: >> Right, alike reddit, twitter, facebook and other PR channels. It's >> "official" because it's controlled by PR Gentoo team, > > No, that does not make anything official. Official would mean a place we > would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 4/30/19 9:05 AM, Cynede wrote: > Right, alike reddit, twitter, facebook and other PR channels. It's > "official" because it's controlled by PR Gentoo team, No, that does not make anything official. Official would mean a place we would place an announcement ourselves and mostly comes down to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 23:23 -0400, desultory wrote: > On 04/29/19 17:04, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman > > wrote: > > > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > > > > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ > > I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord > as an official method of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On 04/29/19 17:04, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> >> In this article on chat services used for OSS: >> >> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ >> >> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Discord

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > In this article on chat services used for OSS: > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ > > I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord as > an official method of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >