Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems (was: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo)

2007-03-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:30:37 +0100 Alexandre Buisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I quite agree with the Patriot act comparison, and I would be interested to know what you think our real problems are. Not a complete list, but probably a good starting point: * Portage. Gentoo hasn't delivered

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems (was: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo)

2007-03-14 Thread expose
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I cannot agree on the Genstef-thingy, nor can I proof you wrong, but I'd be please if in general such things could be done anonymous as it is in some way FUD and might fuel flames...userrel and userreps are there to be talked to about such things. * The wrong idea of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems (was: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo)

2007-03-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:22:55 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot agree on the Genstef-thingy, nor can I proof you wrong, but I'd be please if in general such things could be done anonymous as it is in some way FUD and might fuel flames...userrel and userreps are there to be talked to about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems (was: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo)

2007-03-14 Thread expose
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: All that we'd find out is the kind of user that actively follows requests for information and responds to them. Gentoo currently doesn't have a way of interacting with all the other users out there... Of course you would only find out about the user that responds to the