-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 17:00 -0700 schrieb Josh Saddler:
AllenJB wrote:
I'd favor tags over increasing the category
levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
(tho tags might make searching
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 17:00 -0700 schrieb Josh Saddler:
AllenJB wrote:
I'd favor tags over increasing the category
levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
(tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways).
Heck yes! Tags are a good idea. The idea's
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
(eselect itself would stay in app-admin).
Opinions?
Ulrich
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
(eselect itself would stay in app-admin).
Opinions?
Yes in general. Maybe think about what happens when the
On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
(eselect itself would stay in app-admin).
Opinions?
I hate package moves, so is it really *really* necessary?
--
Fabian
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 18:31:17 AllenJB wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
(eselect itself would stay in app-admin).
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
(eselect itself would stay in app-admin).
Opinions?
I hate package moves, so is it really *really*
Hello world!
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:24 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
(eselect itself would stay in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Riegger wrote:
Hello world!
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:24 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. We could move the
27 eselect-* packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AllenJB wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. We could move the
27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category (eselect
itself would stay in app-admin).
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Fabian Groffen wrote:
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
(eselect itself would stay in app-admin).
I hate package moves, so is it really *really* necessary?
Of course it is not necessary, only a matter of organisation (as most
package
Tuesday, 26. May 2009, Federico Ferri Ви написали:
seems like here two-level categories are a limitation.
if three-level categories were available, I'd say app-admin-xselect.
Argh, should we suffer the same issues over again? What about just dropping
the two/three/etc tier requirement and just
090526 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category;
eselect itself would stay in app-admin.
I hate package moves, so is it really *really* necessary?
Of course it is only a matter of organisation (as most package moves are).
Since there's also
Hello,
I am the student doing the Universal Select Tool for this year's
Geetoo's SoC.
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:35 +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
How will that tool be called? Maybe uselect?
Everything points out to that until now. =)
The way it's done, current eselect modules can continue
2009/5/27 Sérgio Almeida meph...@gmail.com:
this time (SoC starts in a few hours) the prototype is written in
python, does everything eselect does and supports any scripting language
for module's actions. Oh, it's extremely faster too.
You have a working prototype right now? Awesome! Where's
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 01:19 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
2009/5/27 Sérgio Almeida meph...@gmail.com:
this time (SoC starts in a few hours) the prototype is written in
python, does everything eselect does and supports any scripting language
for module's actions. Oh, it's extremely faster
Le 26/05/2009 22:43, Sérgio Almeida a écrit :
Hello,
There isn't yet. The code is still pretty ugly and I'm still refactoring
to the new architecture before I can make it public (or even officially
git it). I will post it on this mailing list as soon as experimentations
are possible.
Please
AllenJB wrote:
I'd favor tags over increasing the category
levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
(tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways).
Heck yes! Tags are a good idea. The idea's been raised on -dev a few
times. I suppose they're not (yet)
18 matches
Mail list logo
