23.09.2013 22:29, Markos Chandras пишет:
On 09/23/2013 03:07 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
we have 'stable', 'dev' and 'exp'; the difference between 'dev' and
'exp' is unclear to me. it could be changed so that broken deps in
'dev' profiles are a repoman error (without -d) but without stable
[ ... ]
Stealing random mail from this thread.
Because I've seen some commits today for reverting the mentioned
KEYWORDS to ~arch in some ebuilds I'm not sure if everyone is aware that
the arch status is set using profiles/profiles.desc and as I'm writing
this, the mentioned arches are still
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Because I've seen some commits today for reverting the mentioned
KEYWORDS to ~arch in some ebuilds I'm not sure if everyone is aware that
the arch status is set using profiles/profiles.desc and as I'm writing
this, the mentioned arches are still
On 23/09/13 15:52, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Because I've seen some commits today for reverting the mentioned
KEYWORDS to ~arch in some ebuilds I'm not sure if everyone is aware that
the arch status is set using profiles/profiles.desc and as I'm writing
On 23/09/13 16:08, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 23/09/13 15:52, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Because I've seen some commits today for reverting the mentioned
KEYWORDS to ~arch in some ebuilds I'm not sure if everyone is aware that
the arch status is set
On 23/09/13 16:08, Samuli Suominen wrote:
can't believe it was like that for amd64-fbsd and nobody noticed before,
fixed that.
scratch that too. left it at dev.
if the entire tree is fine with some arch being at ~ and no dependencies
are broken, that could counted as 'stable' too.
then
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote:
if the entire tree is fine with some arch being at ~ and no dependencies
are broken, that could counted as 'stable' too.
then setting it from 'dev' to 'stable' will just make sure nobody breaks
the perfect record of no dependencies broken.
The
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:57:48 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote:
if the entire tree is fine with some arch being at ~ and no
dependencies are broken, that could counted as 'stable' too.
then setting it from 'dev' to 'stable' will just
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Alexis Ballier wrote:
The problem with that is that we don't track the keyword status of an
arch anywhere in profiles, so tools like ekeyword or ebuild-mode in
Emacs have no way of obtaining that information (other than hardcoding
it).
we do track it with
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:23:35 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Alexis Ballier wrote:
The problem with that is that we don't track the keyword status of
an arch anywhere in profiles, so tools like ekeyword or
ebuild-mode in Emacs have no way of obtaining
On 09/23/2013 03:07 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
we have 'stable', 'dev' and 'exp'; the difference between 'dev' and
'exp' is unclear to me. it could be changed so that broken deps in
'dev' profiles are a repoman error (without -d) but without stable
keywords.
Alexis.
I believe the 'exp'
And committed.
---
Title: m68k, s390, sh are dropping stable keywords
Author: Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:38:57AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
And committed.
---
Title: m68k, s390, sh are dropping stable keywords
Author:
For general review and improvement, to be committed 2013-09-25...
[The summary link [3] will work soon... :) ]
##
Title: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:29:35 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Title: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords
Please note that this is longer than the GLEP 42 specification [1],
which mentions a short (maximum 44 characters) descriptive title.
m68k, s390, and sh are
What should we do with pending stabilization bugs having this arches
CCed? unCC them?
Am Donnerstag, 19. September 2013, 21:49:36 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
What should we do with pending stabilization bugs having this arches
CCed? unCC them?
Not sure... seems logical though...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde)
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
On 2013-09-19 21:29, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
For general review and improvement, to be committed 2013-09-25...
[The summary link [3] will work soon... :) ]
##
Title: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords
To stay within 42 characters, perhaps rewrite the title
18 matches
Mail list logo
