В Пнд, 06/10/2008 в 15:59 +0200, Robert Buchholz пишет:
On Sunday 05 October 2008, Thilo Bangert wrote:
HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/;
Why not use our package site for this, i.e.
HOMEPAGE=http://packages.gentoo.org/package/${CAT}/${PN};
This is not homepage.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robin H Johnson wrote:
HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/;
That would impose needless lookups on subdomains of gentoo.org for
clients trying to load the homepage.
http://gentoo.org/package-has-no-homepage/ then.
Couldn't a page be created at this
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robin H Johnson wrote:
HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/;
That would impose needless lookups on subdomains of gentoo.org for
clients trying to load the homepage.
http://gentoo.org/package-has-no-homepage/ then.
Couldn't a
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 23:38 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robin H Johnson wrote:
HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/;
That would impose needless lookups on subdomains of gentoo.org for
clients trying to load the homepage.
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:49:04 +0200
Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the suggestion is to have one generic homepage for all
packages without one, not a Gentoo-specific homepage for each project.
+1
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/abandoned/
Put that in all ebuilds for packages
On Sunday 05 October 2008, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:44:20 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either we need special cases to declare that it no longer has a
homepage, or we need to allow the empty HOMEPAGE.
On Sunday 05 of October 2008 12:44:20 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm in favour of allowing the variable to empty, because I'm a lazy
upstream, and I haven't even made a basic webpage for some of my
projects (diradm, localshell, readahead-list, etc).
lol
+1 for allowing empty $HOMEPAGE
For projects where the upstream has vanished off the face of the planet,
and the project was reasonably obscure, but the code works fine still,
there's problems with either the requirements of HOMEPAGE or the repoman
check.
From PMS:
\item[HOMEPAGE] The URI or URIs for a package's homepage,
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:44:20 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either we need special cases to declare that it no longer has a
homepage, or we need to allow the empty HOMEPAGE.
HOMEPAGE=( )
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:44:20 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either we need special cases to declare that it no longer has a
homepage, or we need to allow the empty HOMEPAGE.
HOMEPAGE=( )
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Thilo Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:44:20 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either we need special cases to declare that it no longer has a
homepage, or we need to allow the empty
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:52:48PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Thilo Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:44:20 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either we need special cases to
12 matches
Mail list logo
