mån 2010-01-18 klockan 06:27 +0100 skrev Ulrich Mueller:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
isn't a package tree somehow having system-wide implications?
i'm not really sure about /var/db - doesn't seem to be in FHS.
is a package tree a database?
This depends on your
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the current
PORTDIR), /var/portage/distfiles (i.e.
Alex Alexander dixit (2010-01-18, 11:07):
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the
Alex Alexander wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the current
PORTDIR),
On 01/16/10 19:52, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
That is for the overlays, yeah?
But hov about the cache_*.xml files?
I think what he meant was that should layman really only has one
directory? One for cache (downloaded/downloadable lists of overlays?
in /var/cache/layman/?), one for the
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01/16/10 23:46, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers).
Why is that? Please tell more.
Maybe you
dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org:
layman cache is nfs distributable. Also it's good idea to have it close
to PORTDIR. Thus I'd like to keep it somewhere at /usr.
I'd like both to be under /var/
lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:16 +0100 skrev Sebastian Pipping:
On 01/16/10 05:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:55:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the better idea
though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines.
cache
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:57:39 +0100
Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote:
lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Jörg Schaible:
dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org:
layman cache is
On 01/16/10 23:46, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers).
Why is that? Please tell more.
Sebastian
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org wrote:
Yes, PORTDIR default location under /usr was a totally stupid thing.
Please don't repeat it...
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual
On Saturday 16 January 2010 17:46:08 Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org wrote:
Yes, PORTDIR default location under /usr was a totally stupid thing.
Please don't repeat it...
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be
Mike Frysinger posted on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:45:49 -0500 as excerpted:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
- From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If
/var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about
13 matches
Mail list logo
