On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:26:46 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
question but there's a
On 04/11/2010 01:38 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
You ignored my point about this being completely moot once we start using
flags in bugzilla for arch teams. We'll have to change the policy then
to the maintainer being the assignee anyways.
Then we will do it when that happens.
Regards,
Petteri
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:41:34 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/11/2010 01:38 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
You ignored my point about this being completely moot once we start using
flags in bugzilla for arch teams. We'll have to change the policy then
to the maintainer being
* Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org:
So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
In support (and my comments in support):
- Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
And if not only one arch or single arch is slacking?
I guess you would find another gentle way to remind
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Torsten Veller ml...@veller.net wrote:
* Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org:
So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
In support (and my comments in support):
- Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
And if not only one arch or
Alec Warner wrote:
Could we generate a bugzilla search for arch teams? Do arch teams
already use existing bugzilla functionality?
At least when i was with the ppc team, we had a bugzie search. And
bugzie already sorts your query for you. I guess it could be made to
only show keyword=STABLEREQ,
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:07:41 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
see why maintainers would be any more likely to act than an arch team
On 03/14/2010 10:56 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:07:41 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
see why maintainers would be
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:21:13 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
You misunderstood what I meant. The action I am talking about is
reopening the bug. Any developer who notices that a bug should be
reopened should reopen it so it gets noticed.
Sorry, my mistake.
--
fonts,
Samuli Suominen posted on Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:21:52 +0200 as excerpted:
On 03/13/2010 07:07 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
see why maintainers would be any
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
question but there's a difference of opinion here:
Ryan Hill wrote:
I can't find it any more, but that's probably where this idea came
from. It never really made sense to me but I've done it on several occasions.
me too. I guess it's been handed down for ages.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
