Hi
I am writing a new ebuild. The program contains a perlscript (mainprog.pl)
which needs two perl modules like (module1.pm module2.pm)
I will put mainprog.pl in /usr/bin but where do I put the two modules. Shall I
put them in /usr/share/programename and put that to the perl path?
--
Hi guys,
Well, I was working on my bashrc one day and thought, gee, would be
nice for other people to know what the heck is going on too!. Well, I decided
to go ahead and do that :P. So, here we go, a mini bashrc HOWTO (note this
only works on the latest stable of portage. You go
On Sun, 22 May 2005 09:35:42 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I'd like to move the Unofficial Gentoo Development Guide [1] onto my
| devspace [2]. This could be construed as weakening its unofficial
| status (despite the title and the footers), so I'm asking for comments
| first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Earlier today, I added pdflib-6 to the tree. Some of you may need to
accommodate this in your ebuilds. I just wanted you to be aware, so if
you got reports of things related to it suddenly breaking, you'd have a
clue.
Thanks,
Donnie
-BEGIN PGP
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:11 -0700, Jim Northrup wrote:
I'm very happy with new GUID-based volume mounting and more stable raid
tools, but a CF-based or initrd root available when /lib goes to hell is
an absolute must for supporting fault tolerance.
If you use genkernel to build your kernel,
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:12 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 22:44, R Hill wrote:
I like this. It could probably be done through keywording, and in fact
the keywords are already there
On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:49, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
Hi,
ok another problem for Gentoo/FreeBSD project :P
Currently there are a few places where, to fix permissions of files,
the ebuilds does a chown -R root:root ${D} or something similar.
Unfortunately such a command is invalid on
Yes the program looks in @INC for the modules and no the name of the program
is not mainprog.pl. How can I put the two modules in the @INC the gentoo way.
I saw that there is a perl eclass, but I am not sure how to use it correctly.
I will file a Bug when the program works. Or should I already
overall I'm quite pleased with genkernel and have relegated much
tedium to its functions over time. perhaps it's a worthy mule for
more responsibility.
I have mirror volumes which have survived almost 8 years with 2nd and
third generation drives, motherboard, and architecture (32-64 bit).
Chris White wrote:
Hi guys,
Well, I was working on my bashrc one day and thought, gee, would be
nice for other people to know what the heck is going on too!. Well, I
decided to go ahead and do that :P. So, here we go, a mini bashrc HOWTO
(note this only works on the latest stable
Have been having trouble with the mailing lists...
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpKwfWYVHHcs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Rene Zbinden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am writing a new ebuild. The program contains a perlscript
(mainprog.pl) which needs two perl modules like (module1.pm
module2.pm)
I will put mainprog.pl in /usr/bin but where do I put the two modules.
Shall I put them in /usr/share/programename and
Drake Wyrm wrote:
Is this a package that is currently on CPAN? If so, I have a relatively
useful skeleton for writing CPAN ebuilds. I was able to install several
CPAN packages this way. In the ebuild, you'll need to edit or delete any
line marked with XXX, but that will likely be all you need
yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to get
new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice any
regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if your
system comes up :)
Alec Warner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonas Geiregat wrote:
snip ChrisWhite
I gave this a quick look, and aren't you talking about bash scripts in
general rather then .bashrc files using /etc/portage/bashrc as reference
for this document.
Also I can't see the real
On Thursday 26 May 2005 07:47, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonas Geiregat wrote:
snip ChrisWhite
I gave this a quick look, and aren't you talking about bash scripts in
general rather then .bashrc files using /etc/portage/bashrc
Marcus D. Hanwell posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100:
I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that
disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the
patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused
[just to make sure that everybody will hear that]
On Thursday 26 May 2005 01:37, Duncan wrote:
That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4?
I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to
that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^(
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we
want to get
| new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
|
| so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they
notice any
| regressions ?
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:44 -0600, R Hill wrote:
Really? What does such a team do?
They do exactly what is said above. They test ebuilds that are
submitted. They also test patches and just about anything else that
goes into bugzilla. Basically, they are a group
On Thursday 26 May 2005 02:37, Duncan wrote:
Marcus D. Hanwell posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100:
I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that
disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the
patches).
Paul Varner wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:20 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to
get
new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice
any
regressions
22 matches
Mail list logo
