Re: [gentoo-dev] commit reviewing ... new list or keep it on -dev ?

2007-09-18 Thread Robert Buchholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 18.09.2007 um 01:33 schrieb Mike Frysinger: ive been sending private e-mails as i didnt want to make a lot of noise, but many of the comments i make i imagine would be applicable to a lot of people ... i also see others doing reviews and such

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-irc/xdcc-fetch

2007-09-18 Thread Matti Bickel
# Matti Bickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (18 Sep 2007) # Masked for removal in 30 days # Last release 2005, only works with # unsupported FXRuby-1.0 or -1.2. (bug #177785) net-irc/xdcc-fetch Jokey agreed to let it go. This will greatly simplify FXRuby stuff :-) -- Regards, Matti Bickel Signed/Encrypted

Re: [gentoo-dev] meaning of sqlite/sqlite3 use flag

2007-09-18 Thread Doug Goldstein
Caleb Tennis wrote: Does anything need the sqlite2 support in QT? Not explicitly. Qt can also build against an internal version of sqlite2, so it shouldn't be too big of a problem to remove this particular dep (but that doesn't get rid of the flag issue, I suppose). Caleb So

Re: [gentoo-dev] meaning of sqlite/sqlite3 use flag

2007-09-18 Thread Doug Goldstein
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 14 September 2007, Hanno Böck wrote: I noticed that the sqlite/sqlite3-useflags have no consistent meaning in the tree. E.g. - apr-util uses sqlite for sqlite-2.x support and sqlite3 for sqlite-3.x support - eix uses sqlite for sqlite-3.x support Just

[gentoo-dev] heads up: autotools.eclass and invalid autoconf depend atoms

2007-09-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
while adding support to autotools.eclass for WANT_AUTOCONF=none, i noticed we didnt have a fallback for invalid WANT_AUTOCONF values so i added one ... what i didnt realize is that apparently there are ebuilds in the tree which actually got this wrong (erp!) so if you get a dependency error

Re: [gentoo-dev] commit reviewing ... new list or keep it on -dev ?

2007-09-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:28:54AM +0200, Lars Weiler wrote: IMHO this list is a good place for the responses, so that every dev can learn from them. Don't keep them in private only. I can add an appropriate Reply-To in the commit-messages, so that the replies show up here. Reply-To on

Re: [gentoo-dev] commit reviewing ... new list or keep it on -dev ?

2007-09-18 Thread Lars Weiler
* Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/09/17 19:33 -0400]: how do people feel about responses ? keep them all on gentoo-dev or start a new list just for reviews ? IMHO this list is a good place for the responses, so that every dev can learn from them. Don't keep them in private only. I can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council 2007 Election Results

2007-09-18 Thread Shyam Mani
Shyam Mani wrote: http://dev.gentoo.org/~fox2mike/elections/council/2007/ The official link : http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ Regards, -- Shyam Mani | [EMAIL PROTECTED] docs-team | http://gdp.gentoo.org devrel | http://devrel.gentoo.org infra |