-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Here's the agenda. I'm eagerly awaiting submission of EAPI 2, whenever
folks are ready.
I've updated the EAPI 2 draft to remove the eapi* functions and the
gitweb unpack extension as mentioned earlier in Jorge's email [1].
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:43:54 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/eapi/eapi-2-draft.html
By table 6.11, are you implying that you consider the new pkg_ phase
order to be part of EAPI 2?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Robert Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:43:54 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/eapi/eapi-2-draft.html
By table 6.11, are you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:43:54 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/eapi/eapi-2-draft.html
By table 6.11, are you implying that you consider the new pkg_ phase
order to be
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:28 +
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we're talking about adding the following to EAPI-2:
Are we treating PROPERTIES as purely optional and having no defined
values for EAPI 2 then?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Dale wrote:
Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:38:56 +0100, Mike Auty wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
Maybe the best solution is to drop the non-prefixed versions of 'world'
and 'system' completely
Deprecating the old syntax sounds like a sensible action to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:28 +
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we're talking about adding the following to EAPI-2:
Are we treating PROPERTIES as purely optional and having no defined
values for
Luca Barbato wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi again.
Quoting Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage:
21:46 zmedico jmbsvicetto: I think we essentially have a spec already
that people can agree on. just take my draft and subtract the eapi*
functions and the gitweb unpack
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:28 +
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the earlier discussion about EAPI-2 in
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_3e9d42191c3537c4f699c12cadd0ad99.xml
and cardoe's earlier request to the council ml, can the council
members discuss
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Zac Medico wrote:
I think it's worthwhile to have consistent phase ordering across all
EAPIs. Consider an upgrade from EAPI 0 to EAPI 2. If the phase order
is consistent across all EAPIs, as implemented in
=sys-apps/portage-2.1.5, then the order of phase execution order
I guess some of you use spamassassin.
Does anyone volunteer to maintain it?
Search bugzilla for open bug-reports.
Torsten Veller:
I guess some of you use spamassassin.
Does anyone volunteer to maintain it?
Search bugzilla for open bug-reports.
I (or much better net-mail) can take it.
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
On Thursday 11 September 2008 17:42:25 Zac Medico wrote:
Ebuilds that used this approach were easily fixed by moving the has_version
calls to pkg_preinst and storing the results in environment variables.
Which breaks with any portage old enough to not properly support storing
environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Thursday 11 September 2008 17:42:25 Zac Medico wrote:
Ebuilds that used this approach were easily fixed by moving the has_version
calls to pkg_preinst and storing the results in environment variables.
Which breaks
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:14:57 -0400
Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was personally expecting to see some sort of section called EAPI-1
that contains something like:
EAPI-1 consists of EAPI-0 with the following features added...
Have a look at the eapi-differences-summary branch on
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi again.
Quoting Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage:
21:46 zmedico jmbsvicetto: I think we essentially have a spec already
that people can agree on. just take my draft and subtract the eapi*
functions
16 matches
Mail list logo