Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2008-09-11 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: Here's the agenda. I'm eagerly awaiting submission of EAPI 2, whenever folks are ready. I've updated the EAPI 2 draft to remove the eapi* functions and the gitweb unpack extension as mentioned earlier in Jorge's email [1].

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2008-09-11 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:43:54 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/eapi/eapi-2-draft.html By table 6.11, are you implying that you consider the new pkg_ phase order to be part of EAPI 2?

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2008-09-11 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Robert Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 11 September 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:43:54 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/eapi/eapi-2-draft.html By table 6.11, are you

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2008-09-11 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:43:54 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/eapi/eapi-2-draft.html By table 6.11, are you implying that you consider the new pkg_ phase order to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:28 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So we're talking about adding the following to EAPI-2: Are we treating PROPERTIES as purely optional and having no defined values for EAPI 2 then? -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2

2008-09-11 Thread Steve Long
Dale wrote: Holger Hoffstaette wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:38:56 +0100, Mike Auty wrote: Marius Mauch wrote: Maybe the best solution is to drop the non-prefixed versions of 'world' and 'system' completely Deprecating the old syntax sounds like a sensible action to get

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-11 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:28 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So we're talking about adding the following to EAPI-2: Are we treating PROPERTIES as purely optional and having no defined values for

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-11 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Luca Barbato wrote: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Hi again. Quoting Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage: 21:46 zmedico jmbsvicetto: I think we essentially have a spec already that people can agree on. just take my draft and subtract the eapi* functions and the gitweb unpack

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:28 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given the earlier discussion about EAPI-2 in http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_3e9d42191c3537c4f699c12cadd0ad99.xml and cardoe's earlier request to the council ml, can the council members discuss

[gentoo-dev] Re: Phase order changes (was: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September)

2008-09-11 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Zac Medico wrote: I think it's worthwhile to have consistent phase ordering across all EAPIs. Consider an upgrade from EAPI 0 to EAPI 2. If the phase order is consistent across all EAPIs, as implemented in =sys-apps/portage-2.1.5, then the order of phase execution order

[gentoo-dev] mail-filter/spamassassin: maintainer needed

2008-09-11 Thread Torsten Veller
I guess some of you use spamassassin. Does anyone volunteer to maintain it? Search bugzilla for open bug-reports.

Re: [gentoo-dev] mail-filter/spamassassin: maintainer needed

2008-09-11 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Torsten Veller: I guess some of you use spamassassin. Does anyone volunteer to maintain it? Search bugzilla for open bug-reports. I (or much better net-mail) can take it. Tobias signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2008-09-11 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 11 September 2008 17:42:25 Zac Medico wrote: Ebuilds that used this approach were easily fixed by moving the has_version calls to pkg_preinst and storing the results in environment variables. Which breaks with any portage old enough to not properly support storing environment

Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2008-09-11 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Thursday 11 September 2008 17:42:25 Zac Medico wrote: Ebuilds that used this approach were easily fixed by moving the has_version calls to pkg_preinst and storing the results in environment variables. Which breaks

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:14:57 -0400 Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was personally expecting to see some sort of section called EAPI-1 that contains something like: EAPI-1 consists of EAPI-0 with the following features added... Have a look at the eapi-differences-summary branch on

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-11 Thread Doug Goldstein
Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Luca Barbato wrote: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Hi again. Quoting Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage: 21:46 zmedico jmbsvicetto: I think we essentially have a spec already that people can agree on. just take my draft and subtract the eapi* functions