On Saturday 13 June 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
One of the stronger points for collaborating at the source is that
poeple who are not Gentoo devs (yet) and therefore have no write
access to the Gentoo tree can still extend and fix the Gentoo
packagemap entries. Doing it downstream would
Hi all,
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274197
The above bug brings up 2 issues:
First, hplip says one thing, but does another with qt3 and qt4 use-based
dependencies. This is obviously a bug that needs to be fixed.
As a user, the second issue it brings up for me is what is the
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:48:03 +0100
AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274197
The above bug brings up 2 issues:
First, hplip says one thing, but does another with qt3 and qt4
use-based dependencies. This is obviously a bug that needs to be
Robert Buchholz wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
One of the stronger points for collaborating at the source is that
poeple who are not Gentoo devs (yet) and therefore have no write
access to the Gentoo tree can still extend and fix the Gentoo
packagemap entries.
On Monday 15 June 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
However there are a few more things to take into account,
please have a look at my reply to Paul:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/popcon-developers/2009-June/
001759.html
Sorry for not CC'ing you, I should have though of that.
Robert Buchholz wrote:
The consumers of the PackageMap will always only use the central
database.
I'm not sure about that. I rather assume it will happen.
Especially use ignoring the substitution map.
I am convinced the project will be more viable if people can choose
their level of
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Can I have a few more voices on this?: Would you clearly feel more
comfortable and motivated to contribute to PackageMap if it works
at your distro's source package?
You are somewhat missing the point. My point is that most developers
probably don't want to care
Hi,
I'm working on a portage backend for PackageKit [1].
As I did not really present my project, you have to know PackageKit is
an universal (distribution-wide) package manager. To do so, every
package manager which wants to work with PackageKit have to follow an api.
PackageKit is compatible
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
So, where are we right now ?
The planning says every basic features should be done June 15th.
Actually, I still have to do 2 features : list update candidates and do
update. Every other basic features (install, remove, sync, details, dep,
reverse-dep, groups, ...) have
Hi,
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org:
I am convinced the project will be more viable if people can choose
their level of contribution. Many developers just won't care enough
to take the extra hassle.
Agreed. However, I don't see a huge difference in level of
extra hassle. The
Hi,
AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk:
Do packages that can use both/all always use both/all?
No, app-editors/emacs(-cvs) will chose GTK+ above all others (Motif,
Athena) if USE=gtk is specified. This is in compliance with upstream's
wishes to have GTK+ as the default. Otherwise we order
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The website stills says GPL v3:
http://nipper.titania.co.uk/licensing.php
Yep, the website's going to be updated for version 1.0 (with the license
change).
...
I can't really comment on a lot of this, unfortunately.
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 00:58 +0100, Mike Auty wrote:
So I'll leave the source version out of the tree, but I'd like thoughts
on using RPM as a solution? Also I don't know whether an exception
could be made for Gentoo, but equally I don't know how to phrase one of
them either (Gentoo Foundation
Tony \Chainsaw\ Vroon chain...@gentoo.org posted
1245111501.11818.5.ca...@localhost, excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Jun 2009
01:18:21 +0100:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 00:58 +0100, Mike Auty wrote:
So I'll leave the source version out of the tree, but I'd like thoughts
on using RPM as a solution?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again.
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello fellow developers and users.
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
The voting booth has now opened and his waiting for
15 matches
Mail list logo
