On Friday, 5. October 2007, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual
at all?
Tester_ !rdep virtual/editor
jeeves virtual/editor - app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron
I think the answer
On 10/7/07, Robert Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, 5. October 2007, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual
at all?
Tester_ !rdep virtual/editor
jeeves
On Sunday, 7. October 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
On 10/7/07, Robert Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, 5. October 2007, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a
virtual at all?
On Friday 05 October 2007, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 20:27 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at
all?
The system set depends on it, and last I knew didn't allow for
On 20:42 Fri 05 Oct , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
about 26 ebuilds have a PROVIDE=virtual/editor. Those could be
transformed to a new-style virtual, which is really simple. According
to zmedico and genone the impact of just commiting the virtual would
be low. But I'd like to hear
Hi,
about 26 ebuilds have a PROVIDE=virtual/editor. Those could be
transformed to a new-style virtual, which is really simple. According
to zmedico and genone the impact of just commiting the virtual would be
low. But I'd like to hear some comments on it. If noone objects I
will commit it
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at
all?
Tester_ !rdep virtual/editor
jeeves virtual/editor - app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron
I think the answer is none that really should, I would favor just
removing
On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 20:27 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:46:29 -0700
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at
all?
The system set depends on it, and last I knew didn't allow for any-of
deps.
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:46:29 -0700
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at
all?
The system set depends on it, and last I knew didn't allow for any-of
deps.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:18:11 -0400
Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that both sudo and fcron, while they have some versions that
depend on virtual/editor actually hardcode nano as the default.
For the fcron dependency, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/149376#c15 and
onward.
Kind
10 matches
Mail list logo