Daniel Gryniewicz a écrit :
I agree. Let's just have zeroconf.
+1, zeroconf is what it should be called, regardless of different
implementations (especially if they are compatible).
Cheers
--
Rémi Cardona
LRI, INRIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/11/4 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
bonjour is Apple specific branding for zeroconf. This is another case
that needs to be changed.
I just came up with this as nobody mentioned it before :-)
zeroconf/avahi/howl/bonjour/mdnsresponder all need to be condensed.
++ one flag for all
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 12:11 -0500, Doug Goldstein a écrit :
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation
and
it really needs to get rectified.
[snip]
Maybe we should clean the whole thing up and do like net-misc/ntp does
it. Thoughts?
since I'm lazy:
Doug Goldstein schrieb am 04.11.2008 18:11:
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
it really needs to get rectified.
net-misc/ntp
zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
net-print/cups
zeroconf? ( !avahi? (
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Doug Goldstein schrieb am 04.11.2008 18:11:
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
it really needs to get rectified.
net-misc/ntp
zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
net-print/cups
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:44 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
snip
bonjour is Apple specific branding for zeroconf. This is another case
that needs to be changed.
zeroconf/avahi/howl/bonjour/mdnsresponder all need to be condensed.
I agree. Let's just have zeroconf.
Daniel
