On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 17:19 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:15:14PM -0500, Chris Richards wrote:
I'm torn on this, but basically I think we ought to track upstream here.
Which is... ? ;-)
Well, it looked to me like Christopher pretty much squashed the patch,
for
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 17:19 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:15:14PM -0500, Chris Richards wrote:
I'm torn on this, but basically I think we ought to track upstream here.
Which is... ? ;-)
Well, it looked to me like Christopher pretty much squashed the patch,
for
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:40:01PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
[...]
Also, we don't have policies exclusively for lighttpd. Do you know how
that fits in?
It's completely covered by sec-policy/selinux-apache. The httpd_t domain
works pretty well with lighttpd (running it here) and contains
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:15:14PM -0500, Chris Richards wrote:
I'm torn on this, but basically I think we ought to track upstream here.
Which is... ? ;-)
As I said, there's no clear consensus from within upstream.
But I notice most people aim for a specific nginx module, so that's what
we'll
Hi folks,
As per bug #368795 [1] we have an open request to include a SELinux policy
module for the nginx webserver. However, while working on this, I remembered
a small discussion that upstream had about the same matter [2]. It boils
down to the question: do we support nginx within the existing
El 15/06/11 19:45, Sven Vermeulen escribió:
Or do we see if we can deviate from upstream here and start our own path (in
my opinion, we can't as long as we do not have a critical developer mass -
in numbers, not in kilogram).
Hey, I'm not that fat :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 06/15/2011 01:45 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
So... ideas? Do we want to keep it simple and update the apache policy to
support nginx? Or do we want to stay least privilege and have dedicated
rules for applications?
I'm only slowly coming around to policy development, but from my selinux
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 20:40 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 06/15/2011 01:45 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
So... ideas? Do we want to keep it simple and update the apache policy to
support nginx? Or do we want to stay least privilege and have dedicated
rules for applications?
I'm
