Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?

2005-10-31 Thread m h
On 10/31/05, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:16:44PM -0800, m h wrote: Kito- Are you leveraging the work done by Haubi documented here: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Use_prefixed_portage_%28in_development%29 Yah, although differs in certain respects; 1

Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?

2005-11-01 Thread m h
On 10/31/05, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Brian Harring wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:16:44PM -0800, m h wrote: Should be usable in both cases. Literally, the prefix stable patch is chunks of my 2.1 work and haubi's work torn out and integrated

Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?

2005-11-07 Thread m h
Kito- How long do you suppose it will be til us common folk can get a tarball? thanks matt On 11/4/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/1/05, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 1, 2005, at 4:01 PM, m h wrote: Well, if this is round two (which seems kind of weird since it's

Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?

2005-11-08 Thread m h
thanks for the update. I'll be patient... On 11/8/05, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 8, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Grobian wrote: getting impatient, eh? I AM FIRST m h wrote: Kito- How long do you suppose it will be til us common folk can get a tarball? Hehe, sorry its

Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?

2005-12-04 Thread m h
Kito- Just pinging again. Can you provide a status update? Is there a tarball/patch for prefix available somewhere? thanks matt On 11/8/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks for the update. I'll be patient... On 11/8/05, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 8, 2005, at 10:53 AM

[gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-14 Thread m h
Kito/others who may be interested-- This probably belongs in alt-gentoo, but since it seems like half the posts there are flames, I thought I'd post here. I've attempted to use Haubi's toolbox with the tarballs (portage and prefixed overlay) provided by Kito to install a prefix version of

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-14 Thread m h
Another question. PORTDIR is not getting the prefixed value in portage.py. Kito, how are you setting this? Are you using an env variable? On 12/14/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I have a question: Where can I get the ${PREFIX}/usr/local/portage/profiles directory from to bootstrap

[gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-15 Thread m h
os.chown error. I'll look into this. Portage as of now has a requirement to be run as root, which (I believe) Haubi removed, but Kito hasn't. I don't think this should be a requirement. Debate? I'm going to keep plowing ahead. Will keep you guys posted of progress I make. matt On 12/15/05, m h

[gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-15 Thread m h
Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user currently, only the group). So in portage_data.py, I override portage_uid to my userid portage_uid=os.getuid() and I'm rolling again. Now I get the following: Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/libc Invalid package

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-16 Thread m h
: On 15-12-2005 16:35:36 -0800, m h wrote: PORTDIR /usr/portage --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree? I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error). This somehow indicates your profile isn't setup correctly. I had that myself too

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-16 Thread m h
On 12/16/05, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:35:36PM -0800, m h wrote: Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user currently, only the group). So in portage_data.py, I override portage_uid to my userid portage_uid=os.getuid

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-16 Thread m h
The easiest way around this is to add secpass=2 to the bottom of portage_data.py Note that the comment in portage_data.py reading: #Secpass will be set to 1 if the user is root or in the portage group. is erroneous. It should say set to 2... On 12/16/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/16/05

[gentoo-osx] prefix issues (EAPI, gid, ...)

2005-12-16 Thread m h
End of another day, so I'm starting another thread. I've attached my bootstrap script. I still need to do the following to get to the error below. root hack (secpass...) Add content to PORTDIR (using's haubi's prefixed overlay... tried kito's but it barfed..) Manually update make.conf to point

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-17 Thread m h
This is great thanks! On 12/17/05, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I decided to to something completely different today, and went on trying to get this working. First I tried to follow your steps: On 14-12-2005 15:21:41 -0800, m h wrote: ===Steps for prefix

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: prefix issues (EAPI, gid, ...)

2005-12-17 Thread m h
On 12/16/05, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:05:49PM -0800, m h wrote: Hmmm, it's one of those non-deterministic days After looking at the code then running it again (don't think I changed anything) I now get the following for emerge -av system

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

2005-12-17 Thread m h
Doesn't Kito's ebuild's already have EAPI? Or do you want different packages? On 12/17/05, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 17-12-2005 14:49:40 +0100, Grobian wrote: (pegasus:~/scratch/programs/gentoo) fabian% usr/bin/emerge info portage: 'portage' user or group missing. Please update

[gentoo-osx] PREFIX the next generation...

2005-12-19 Thread m h
So following Grobian's lead I decided I'll not worry about toolsbox right now and just try to get portage working (I'm on linux so I already have the requirements for portage...) I wrote the notoolsbox.sh (pasted in below) script to document my steps. After the standard user/group tweaks, I'm

Re: [gentoo-osx] PREFIX the next generation...

2005-12-19 Thread m h
I'm basically at the same state with Haubi's toolsbox and your method. After chatting with Kito I'm also thinking about sticking with toolsbox. (Since it is pretty generic and should run on most any unix). Kito also helped explain the next steps with seem to be coming up with

Re: [gentoo-osx] PREFIX the next generation...

2005-12-20 Thread m h
No, that doesn't work. I've looked through the code of portage and the portage.root value is hardcoded in some places as / On 12/20/05, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20-12-2005 07:32:30 +0100, Grobian wrote: On 19-12-2005 17:33:23 -0800, m h wrote: !!! File system problem. (Bad

Re: [gentoo-osx] PREFIX the next generation...

2005-12-20 Thread m h
Thanks, after setting that and a few more symlinks, I'm compiling away On 12/20/05, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20-12-2005 12:11:41 -0800, m h wrote: No, that doesn't work. I've looked through the code of portage and the portage.root value is hardcoded in some places

Re: [gentoo-osx] PREFIX the next generation...

2005-12-20 Thread m h
On 12/20/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, after setting that and a few more symlinks, I'm compiling away Hmm, let me re-phrase that. I'm configuring away. Been configuring for the past 20 minutes or so. (Actually I don't think it's configuring, I think it is stuck. Here's

Re: [gentoo-osx] PREFIX the next generation...

2005-12-20 Thread m h
still chugging. Upto 550Megs of memory for configure I guess I need to see what is really going on here... On 12/20/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/20/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, after setting that and a few more symlinks, I'm compiling away Hmm, let me re

Re: [gentoo-osx] Latest adventures in PREFIX

2006-01-04 Thread m h
Ahhh, back to the grind after vacation I'm still basically stuck where I was before, with configure messing up. But when I run it from the command line (with the same PATH environment) it works On 1/3/06, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right. I tracked down where portage spits out

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Creating a profile (package.provided)

2006-03-16 Thread m h
On 3/16/06, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 16-03-2006 11:12:58 -0800, m h wrote: I'll start off looking at why my profile has a ! in front what does % ls -la /home/spike/portage/portage-alt-prefix/profiles/linux/x86/fc3 say for you? $ ls -la /home/spike/portage/portage-alt-prefix

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Creating a profile (package.provided)

2006-03-16 Thread m h
On 3/16/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/16/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try copying over the normal tree from my gentoo box. I fixed it by doing an absolute symlink rather than relative ie: $ ln -s /tmp/Mar16/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1 etc/make.profile

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] portage 2.1.11 updates...

2006-03-17 Thread m h
OSX Folks- Again I apologize for the apparent spamming. On 3/17/06, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 17, 2006, at 12:59 PM, m h wrote: I'm running on 2.1.11. Sitll getting the OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/Mar17/var/lib/portage/world' after installing portage

[gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] portage 2.1.11 bootstraping script

2006-03-17 Thread m h
Folks Here's my script for trying portage. I'm running on RHEL4 and getting the problems I've sent earlier. If you've got a few minutes try it out on your computer. Let me know if it works for you ;) #!/bin/sh export PREFIX=/tmp/Mar17 #this directory has portage and the ebuild tree from the

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] portage 2.1.11 bootstraping script

2006-03-20 Thread m h
On 3/18/06, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cd $PORTCODE #./configure --prefix=${PREFIX} --with-user=`whoami` --with-group=${GROUP} --sysconfdir=${PREFIX}/etc --with-rootuser=`whoami` --with-rootuid=`id -u` --with-offset-prefix=${PREFIX} Why this first configure with the bad ${PREFIX}

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install.

2006-03-21 Thread m h
On 3/21/06, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20-03-2006 16:47:28 -0800, m h wrote something which is not quoted One question. It seems as if the emerge of patch goes fine. I think I missed what the problem is somehow. I remember that the first ebuilds were a bit like helping them a hand

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install.

2006-03-21 Thread m h
So, I'm plowinbeg ahead (even though my install maybe/is broken?) In addition to the stuff I listed earlier, I've done the following: echo #matt added this sys-apps/portage-2.1.10 sys-devel/binutils-2.15 sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 sys-devel/gcc-3.4 dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7a sys-apps/sed-4.1.2

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install.

2006-03-21 Thread m h
On 3/21/06, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21-03-2006 11:05:22 -0800, m h wrote: Has anyone else ran into this? I'm not setting this flag and don't see it in the ebuilds Yep sure I do! I believe it had to do with my install of GCC. There was a problem somewhere, but I don't

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install.

2006-03-21 Thread m h
On 3/21/06, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Grobian wrote: On 21-03-2006 11:05:22 -0800, m h wrote: Has anyone else ran into this? I'm not setting this flag and don't see it in the ebuilds Yep sure I do! I believe it had to do with my install of GCC

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install.

2006-03-21 Thread m h
Any hints on how to get gcc installed? One option would be installing pycrypto via rpm and adding to package.provided. Another would be to try getting python and pycrypto installed via emerge. It must've been the python eclass looking in the hardcoded prefixed path for the python shared

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install.

2006-03-21 Thread m h
On 3/22/06, Kito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 21, 2006, at 11:07 PM, m h wrote: Any hints on how to get gcc installed? One option would be installing pycrypto via rpm and adding to package.provided. Another would be to try getting python and pycrypto installed via emerge

[gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Ready to go on Ubuntu...

2006-04-06 Thread m h
Hey Folks- I haven't spammed anyone for a week (or tried doing PREFIXy stuff during that time). I'm going to be trying it on Ubuntu for the next week or so. I noticed there was some chatter about broken ROOT and whatnot on the IRC channel. Should I start with 2.1.14? (Or is it severely

Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Ready to go on Ubuntu...

2006-04-10 Thread m h
On 4/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 07-04-2006 18:54:44 -0700, m h wrote: Complaint that emake wasn't found, which is found in usr/portage/bin. I added ${PREFIX}/usr/portage/bin to DEFAULT_PATH in make.globals and continued. Not sure if this is a regression (could

[gentoo-osx] Re: [PREFIX] texinfo not finding ncurses

2006-04-11 Thread m h
Later the build fails with: gcc -Os -march=pentium4 -pipe -L/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/lib -L/opt/portage/Apr7/lib -o ginfo dir.o display.o dribble.o echo-area.o filesys.o footnotes.o gc.o indices.o info-utils.o info.o infodoc.o infomap.o m-x.o man.o nodemenu.o nodes.o search.o

[gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass

2006-04-11 Thread m h
While trying to emerge gcc I got the following error: !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1585: Called source '/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild' gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild, line 36: Called inherit 'toolchain' 'eutils' ebuild.sh,

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass

2006-04-11 Thread m h
Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I guess we will make our own branch/fork(???). (Note that we want to roll back everything we can) On 4/11/06, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11-04-2006 13:20:27 -0700, m h wrote: Is this SVN tree available publicly

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass

2006-04-11 Thread m h
On 4/11/06, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Grobian wrote: On 11-04-2006 13:44:50 -0700, m h wrote: Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I guess we will make our own branch/fork(???). I'm looking

Re: [gentoo-osx] Tool to add EAPI=prefix

2006-05-15 Thread m h
for a lot ebuilds... I like the idea! On 15-05-2006 09:46:09 -0700, m h wrote: Folks- I've hacked together some portage code to add new ebuilds to a prefixed overlay. The idea is to be able to migrate existing ebuilds to prefix by: * finding the latest version of the ebuild * copying

[gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] User account management

2006-06-12 Thread m h
Folks- Has anyone thought out user management in a prefix setting. An example being apache or mysql which usually run as their own users. Is this the plan for prefix too? I'd like to hear others thoughts on this. thanks matt -- gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Prefix tree location

2006-06-23 Thread m h
Grobian- We have a bunch of prefixed ebuilds that we would like to contribute. I'm not sure why the opposition to experimental, but if it needs to be hosted externally, then I'm in favor of that. .. BTW, where is Kito? (Long time no hear...) -matt On 6/13/06, Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED]