Michael Stewart (vericgar) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The details of the error should be in /var/log/apache2/suexec_log
No and that was one thing that was confusing me. Suexec doesn't log
becasue the failure happens before it runs.
Also, the permission denied error for suexec2 itself is
Jason A. Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have never used suexec, but I would think it better to
chown root:apache /usr/sbin/suexec2
or whatever group needs it as apposed to making it world executable
I thought it might be a nasty security problem too and asked about it
on the apache list.
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:51:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few people have mentioned not having used Suexec making me wonder if
there is some other way to allow myuser to run cgi?
I usually run apache as apache:web with the user creating the web stuff
in the web group.
Justin
--
Hi,
I updated my system from a 2005 profile to the last one , and
ran:
15 emerge --update --deep --newuse -p world
but openoffice is still the old version:
pietra / # emerge -s openoffice
Searching...
[ Results for search key : openoffice ]
[ Applications found : 2 ]
* app-office/openoffice
Justin R Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:51:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few people have mentioned not having used Suexec making me wonder if
there is some other way to allow myuser to run cgi?
I usually run apache as apache:web with the user creating
Hi,
I updated my system from a 2005 profile to the last one , and
ran:
15 emerge --update --deep --newuse -p world
but openoffice is still the old version:
Of course ;-).
Thal little -p in your command prevented the actual update an only
showed you what would happen.
Leave the -p out of
Does anybody know what this means?
$ su
Password:
configuration error - unknown item 'GETPASS_ASTERISKS' (notify administrator)
#
--
Bo Andresen
pgp63VEmqBo9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thursday 08 June 2006 11:29 skrev Bo Ørsted Andresen:
Does anybody know what this means?
$ su
Password:
configuration error - unknown item 'GETPASS_ASTERISKS' (notify
administrator) #
Sorry. I forgot to search b.g.o... :(
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135987
--
Bo Andresen
Ups, sorry I copy/pasted here the wrong command.
Obviously I gave
emerge --update --deep --newuse world
and compilation went on for quite a long time.
Ciao, Leo
--- Norman Rie� [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I updated my system from a 2005 profile to the last one ,
and
ran:
15 emerge
Sorry, I replied to you.
Need sleep.
Leo
--- Norman Rie� [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I updated my system from a 2005 profile to the last one ,
and
ran:
15 emerge --update --deep --newuse -p world
but openoffice is still the old version:
Of course ;-).
Thal little -p in your
After googling I have commented out appropriate string in /etc/login.defs
=== On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:29, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: ===
Does anybody know what this means?
$ su
Password:
configuration error - unknown item 'GETPASS_ASTERISKS' (notify administrator)
#
--
Bo Andresen
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 03:37:01 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin R Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:51:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few people have mentioned not having used Suexec making me
wonder if there is some other way to allow myuser to
Leonardo schrieb:
Ups, sorry I copy/pasted here the wrong command.
Obviously I gave
emerge --update --deep --newuse world
and compilation went on for quite a long time.
Ciao, Leo
Hm... and what does emerge -pu openoffice show?
If there is no update to 2.x shown, then perhaps you could
thanks every body,
every thing goes fine now without errors i didn't change any thing
just a reboot then etc-update; env-update and every thing works fine.
On 6/8/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/06, Evan Klitzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, the only thing that you need to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Richard Fish
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 9:24 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
On 6/7/06, Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chain. At the end of the first
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 05:34:49 -0700 Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, sorry that's just wrong. gcc is slotted, if the above were true
there would be no need for gcc-config in order to select a default
compiler.
Did you follow the documentation pointer given in the mail you are
Hi
emerge -pu openoffice
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild U ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.2-r1 [1.1.4]
I can go on emerging it (and I already started), but I was
wondering if it's possible that other packages are not updated
as
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Werner Hilse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:32 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
You haven't understood a word from the posting you're replying to.
It does have to be emerged twice
Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young:
Show me some documentation for this staging you refer to.
If you unpack the gcc sources you will find it in gcc-*/INSTALL/build.html as
already mentioned by Richard. But you can also see it at [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
--
Bo
Hello,
During the night (I was basically comotose) I thought I saw something about
a new profile, beyond /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.0
In fact I thought I saw it with 'Q2' in the name. When I look in
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/ I do not see anything newer
than
-Original Message-
From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:29 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young:
Show me some documentation for this staging you refer
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:00:22AM -0700, Bob Young wrote:
From: Hans-Werner Hilse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:32 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
Try to understand what you are replying to. GCC's internal build
I would like to install PostgreSQL Autodoc from http://www.rbt.ca/autodoc
and since there is no package in Portage I was wondering if anybody has it
installed.
Alternatively, any information on another similar tool which is supported
will be welcome.
pgpN8c7ULJewI.pgp
Description: PGP
OpenOffice is the one package I have decided I can do without building.
I don't know what the build does (honestly, I didn't bother too look),
but after 18 hours and 3GB of disk it still wasn't finished. This is
on an Athlon XP 1500 with 512GB Ram.
I haven't build Gnome in a while, but building
Others have already coverd the major points, so just a couple of
things to add...
On 6/8/06, Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you absolutely 100% sure that every single system utility and
application is *dynamically* linked, and that no apps or utilities anywhere
in the system specifies
wtf?512 GB ram? ^^2006/6/8, Devon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OpenOffice is the one package I have decided I can do without building.I don't know what the build does (honestly, I didn't bother too look),but after 18 hours and 3GB of disk it still wasn't finished. This is
on an Athlon XP 1500 with
Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What you're experiencing seems to be just a missing ScriptAlias. RTFM
about calling CGIs...
This is a single user machine so security from users is only a problem
from me blundering around... That was why I wanted to keep
experimentation at
On 6/8/06, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
In fact I thought I saw it with 'Q2' in the name. When I look in
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/ I do not see anything newer
than 2006.0. HOw does one stay abreast of the newest profiles?
It actually isn't that important to stay
Umm, yeah, that should have been an M, not a G.
On 6/8/06, Ralph Thaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wtf?
512 GB ram? ^^
2006/6/8, Devon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OpenOffice is the one package I have decided I can do without building.
I don't know what the build does (honestly, I didn't
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:32:17 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What you're experiencing seems to be just a missing ScriptAlias. RTFM
about calling CGIs...
What I've found is that if I set ScriptAlias to
/var/www/localhost/cgi-bin/ then it
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
It doesn't die. And it usually doesn't do it when I'm around, but when I
come
back to my system in the morning there are usually 200 or so crash dialogs
waiting for me, all indicating the application suffered a SIGFPE (floating
point error?). But it keeps on working
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 07. Jun 2006, 18:31:46 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, 07. Jun 2006, 06:29:26 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm getting suexec errors in apache error_log. According to all
documentation on the subject .. suexec
OK, I assume we are talking about Apache web server here. If that's the
case I would suppose you are missing the following in your httpd.conf:
-
Directory /home/*/public_html/cgi-bin/
Options ExecCGI
SetHandler cgi-script
/Directory
-
The whole documentation about mod_userdir which enables
Evan Klitzke eklitzke at gmail.com writes:
It actually isn't that important to stay abreast of the newest
profiles. If you actually look at the profile, you'll see three
files. One of them is packages, which just specifies the minimum
versions for a couple packages (in this case baselayout,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I assume we are talking about Apache web server here. If that's the
case I would suppose you are missing the following in your httpd.conf:
-
Directory /home/*/public_html/cgi-bin/
Options ExecCGI
SetHandler cgi-script
/Directory
Thanks, I seem to have
Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harry wrote:
If I do not define ScriptAlias at all then cgi works under
$public_html but cgi under $htdocs is just displayed as a file.
Hans-Werner answered:
Sorry, my fault. A ScriptAlias alone isn't likely to work, if I read
this correctly:
Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, sorry, I gave up. Today I happend to retry it and I'm
happy to discover: it works.
Well no harm done...
Now you get to ponder why... hehe.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 6/8/06, Leonardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can go on emerging it (and I already started), but I was
wondering if it's possible that other packages are not updated
as this one and what the reason for it could be.
The most likely reason you didn't see the upgrade is that OOo was not
in your
Holas,
I've just recently fixed a problem I had when scrolling up. Doing that would
send out a signal that I had pressed the scroll button, and try to paste.
Changing the mouse protocol in xorg.conf from
#Option ProtocolIMPS/2
Option Protocolauto
fixed the problem. That's
On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:19, Peter Kelly wrote:
Holas,
Great.
How can I find out what protocol xorg is using now? Apparently, I'll need
to know pretty soon.
Duh. Look in /var/log/Xorg.0.log. You'll see a neat little line that says
(**) Mouse1: Protocol: ExplorerPS/2
Never mind.
Peter
On Fri, June 9, 2006 4:25 am, Peter Kelly wrote:
On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:19, Peter Kelly wrote:
Holas,
Great.
How can I find out what protocol xorg is using now? Apparently, I'll
need
to know pretty soon.
Duh. Look in /var/log/Xorg.0.log. You'll see a neat little line that
says
I am not quite sure what went wrong.
The result: http://www.math.princeton.edu/~wwong/20061600026.png
whenever I try to access a website with flash content on it, the
weird bands of messed-up stuff appear across the screen. It does go
away after I close the offending tab, and performs some
42 matches
Mail list logo
