Hans-Werner Hilse napsal(a):
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:07:52 +0100 (CET) paulie.x [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to the OP: Configure your terminal accordingly (for console: set
consoletrans and -font correctly) or if you didn't yet, install a
unicode-aware terminal program.
It is not true
Hans-Werner Hilse napsal(a):
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:07:52 +0100 (CET) paulie.x [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to the OP: Configure your terminal accordingly (for console: set
consoletrans and -font correctly) or if you didn't yet, install a
unicode-aware terminal program.
It is not true
* Steve [Gentoo] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23. Feb 07:
I want to use screen, but my emacs-afflicted fingers automatically type
control-a to go to the beginning of the line in my shell - which is
somewhat unfortunate for screen.
With default settings you can send the escape key to an application
(like
On Friday 23 February 2007 17:40, Steve [Gentoo] wrote:
I want to use screen, but my emacs-afflicted fingers automatically type
control-a to go to the beginning of the line in my shell - which is
somewhat unfortunate for screen.
Amen. Luckily I'm not an emacs user, so I quickly broke myself
Dale wrote:
Well, I like nano better but not if I can use something GUI. ;-)
That option is not exactly what I am hoping to use.
I don't understand portage and ebuilds well enough to do that. How
about this. Is there a way to just tell emerge to emerge each
separate package and get rid
On Friday 23 February 2007 22:18, Jürgen Geuter wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 02:39 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
If you need to execute something put it to
/etc/conf.d/local.start or
/etc/conf.d/local.stop
Does not fully work, since some services require the coda
volumes mounted. So
On Saturday 24 February 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] ot - video encoding':
Hi List im looking for a program to encode from avi to divx does anyone
know of a program to do this?
Short answer: mencoder
Longer answer:
(1) Avi is not a format -- or at least it's not a video
Dale wrote:
Here is the thing that is so odd, it will open any other
large file and work fine but it will mess up on emerge.log.
Open a copy of your emerge.log in vim and do:
:%s/\*\*\*//
After that KWrite will handle the file without a problem. As to
why, I can only guess: when the
Sorry for posting this again but can anybody help?
How do I find out what 451 Temporary Local Problem is?
Paul
Hello all,
Sometime ago I stopped receiving elog mail messages.
The error in the log is:-
sendmail: RCPT TO:my email address (451 Temporary local problem - please
try later)
!!!
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 12:15 +, Paul Stear wrote:
Sorry for posting this again but can anybody help?
How do I find out what 451 Temporary Local Problem is?
Paul
Hello all,
Sometime ago I stopped receiving elog mail messages.
The error in the log is:-
sendmail: RCPT TO:my email
Dear Gentoo users,
I'm having VNC-related problems.
I want to make VNC'ing work the following:
I have a Gentoo desktop box with gdm+gnome, only one user. I'm using X
on DISPLAY:0 0-24/7 all the time. If I'm not sitting in front of the
box, I lock the session with the corresponding Gnome menu.
Philip Webb wrote:
Google 'vim automatic comment' finds sect 30.6 of the Vim User Manual,
which covers something similar; also
http://ianua.initd.org/vimit/vim63/html/change.html#fo-table
which seems to cover what you describe under options 'r' 'o'.
Perhaps this will get you started, if
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 13:38 +0100, Gyuszk wrote:
All in all: I want to connect (using TightVNC Win32) to the existing
DISPLAY:0 (gnome) session. Is it possible?
If isn't, the following will do:
VNC server *always*[1] creates a new X server to export. It doesn't
export the (X) console.
If
On Saturday, 24 February 2007 23:08, Gyuszk wrote:
Dear Gentoo users,
I'm having VNC-related problems.
I want to make VNC'ing work the following:
I have a Gentoo desktop box with gdm+gnome, only one user. I'm using X
on DISPLAY:0 0-24/7 all the time. If I'm not sitting in front of the
box,
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Dale wrote:
Here is the thing that is so odd, it will open any other
large file and work fine but it will mess up on emerge.log.
Open a copy of your emerge.log in vim and do:
:%s/\*\*\*//
After that KWrite will handle the file without a problem. As
On Saturday 24 February 2007 13:38, Gyuszk wrote:
All in all: I want to connect (using TightVNC Win32) to the existing
DISPLAY:0 (gnome) session. Is it possible?
I think you need a VNC server that allows connections to display :0 (eg,
the real display).
Portage offers x11vnc and xf4vnc to do
Hi,
I successfully managed to run AIGLX+Beryl with the following system:
videocard: ati radeon 9200se
xorg: 7.1 (stable, from Portage)
beryl: 0.1.4 (~x86, from Portage)
window decorator: emerald 0.1.4 (~x86, from portage).
xfce: 4.2 (stable, from Portage)
It works mostly OK, but I have two
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 07:11:46AM -0600, Penguin Lover Dale squawked:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Open a copy of your emerge.log in vim and do:
:%s/\*\*\*//
H, I don't have vim installed.
use sed, the syntax is practically the same.
sed -e s/\*\*\*// /var/log/emerge.log
Etaoin Shrdlu írta:
On Saturday 24 February 2007 13:38, Gyuszk wrote:
All in all: I want to connect (using TightVNC Win32) to the existing
DISPLAY:0 (gnome) session. Is it possible?
I think you need a VNC server that allows connections to display :0 (eg,
the real display).
Steve [Gentoo] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to use screen, but my emacs-afflicted fingers automatically type
control-a to go to the beginning of the line in my shell - which is
somewhat unfortunate for screen.
I too am an emacs user. I have
escape \
as the first line of my
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful while all other of you Responsible mailing
list users writing
Mantas Povilaitis ha scritto:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful while all other of you
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 19:51 +0200, Mantas Povilaitis wrote:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
[...precedes to flame and whine]
I just want to say that I agree with you 100%.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
1)I have a Firefox instance on desktop A. I do switch (by clicking on
pager, no cube etc.- cube is not working btw) to desktop B, then again
to desktop A. The firefox window often is no more visible on desktop A,
nor it appears in the Expose plugin. I can see it on the task bar and
click it,
b.n. wrote:
Yes, but we love it. I would continue, but I'm going to the cheese shop
in front of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
No, no, no. Go to the pet shop and buy a parrot! ;)
Be lucky,
Neil
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
b.n. ha scritto:
2)The xfce standard pager doesn't show windows in other beryl desktops,
only in the current active desktop.
This is unsolved instead.
Where can I look for hints on what's wrong and how to solve it?
Moreover, it seems that the svn does a complete mess when switching
Dear gentoo users,
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why?
Is really development version of Firefox in Portage, or what?
Thanks a
On 2007-02-24, Gyuszk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear gentoo users,
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why?
Some licensing BS or
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:06:20PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote
Walter Dnes wrote:
Guess what happens to the bookmarks next time there's a minor version
bump to any of those programs (e.g. when I update world)? I suppose I
should try to slap together a script that's run after emerge. It
Mantas Povilaitis wrote:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful while all other of you Responsible
Willie Wong wrote:
use sed, the syntax is practically the same.
sed -e s/\*\*\*// /var/log/emerge.log /tmp/sedemerge.log
and then open /tmp/sedemerge.log using Kwrite.
Best,
W
Thanks Willie. That worked great. I wonder if someone needs to tell
the programmer for portage that
Maybe, just maybe, if we all stoped posting (mailing) to this thread,
it would go away, and we wouldn't have this problem.
Something to chew on..
--
Samuel (shardz)
Shardz's Igloo:
shardz.homelinux.net
Registered Linux User #410639
amarok.kde.org
defectivebydesign.org
usmc.mil
Grant Edwards schrieb:
On 2007-02-24, Gyuszk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear gentoo users,
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree).
Gyuszk wrote:
Dear gentoo users,
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why?
Is really development version of Firefox in Portage, or
On Saturday 24 February 2007 20:50:37 Gyuszk wrote:
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why?
Is really development version of
Thomas Rösner írta:
Grant Edwards schrieb:
On 2007-02-24, Gyuszk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear gentoo users,
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox
Grant Edwards írta:
On 2007-02-24, Gyuszk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear gentoo users,
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree).
Yes it's pointing to the correct kernel source - Thanks
I recompiled my kernel and modprobe rt61 worked. I now have an interface
that come up called ra0.
The following worked for me:
Added rt61 to /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6
# ln -s net.lo net.ra0
I edited /etc/conf.d/net
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why?
Some licensing BS or other.
Is really development version of Firefox in Portage, or
It is true then that emerge --depclean never unmerges slotted packages?
Just how would portage know that an old slot is no longer needed? Just
because a newer version is installed doesn't mean it's been compiled or
that the old is no longer needed (you might need to compile some
Hello, apparently it's time for me to upgrade like so:
mail-mta/postfix-2.3.6 [2.2.10]
Has anyone else made this upgrade? How did it go? Anything to watch out for?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I think it is not a good idea to call Firefox (for some
branding issue) its development codename. Maybe Gentoo should use
Debian's Iceweasel name.
I agree. It's confusing that the brand-less name is the same as the
On 2007-02-25, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, apparently it's time for me to upgrade like so:
mail-mta/postfix-2.3.6 [2.2.10]
Has anyone else made this upgrade?
Yup.
How did it go?
OK, though I somehow forgot to merge my settings into the new
.cf files on one machine. It ran with
43 matches
Mail list logo
