I had this problem and solved it by deleting ~/.gnome ~/.gnome2 and
~/.gnome2_private
Hi, I have the same problem here. Deleting the files help, but not for
long. After 3-4 Logins without any problem, the problem returns.
regards
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Shouldn't the scroll wheel in gthumb cycle through, browse, the images
rather than change the magnification on a specific image? Can this be
changed? I found Ubuntu references on this, nothing gentoo specific.
thanks,
Thufir
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I seem to have the permissions wrong in fstab. On boot I do have an icon
on the desktop for the LVM volume, which can be browsed as root, but not
as a user.
I want read/write permissions to the LVM volume as user thufir (or any
user, really). Can this be done?
arrakis ~ #
arrakis ~ #
Hi,
My apache2 worked fine until lasta Friday I update it to 2.2.6.
Now, when I try to access my drupal site, I see this error in firefox:
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
and looking error log file:
Directory index forbidden by Options directive:
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2007 schrieb ext Thufir:
I seem to have the permissions wrong in fstab. On boot I do have an icon
on the desktop for the LVM volume, which can be browsed as root, but not
as a user.
I want read/write permissions to the LVM volume as user thufir (or any
user, really).
Hi,
my current default gcc is of version 4.1.2 but I would like to
switch to version 4.2.1.
As root (only) I can do
gcc-config i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.2.1
but this switch is lost after re-login.
Furthermore I cannot switch in non-root mode.
(BTW I'm using the zshell)
Many thanks for a hint,
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Extra benefits of LVM: You won't need this right now for your simple
desktop with one drive, but it's good to know what else LVM can do:
Snapshots.
Well, I disagree. This feature is also very useful on a
single drive setup. Reason why: Backup. You can
On Monday 08 October 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Extra benefits of LVM: You won't need this right now for your
simple desktop with one drive, but it's good to know what else LVM
can do:
Snapshots.
Well, I disagree. This feature is also very
On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
My apache2 worked fine until lasta Friday I update it to 2.2.6.
Now, when I try to access my drupal site, I see this error in firefox:
I'm just guessing, but Apache 2.2.6 removed index.htm from the list of
default index files. It may be possible
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:52:41 +0100
Steve Dommett wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
My apache2 worked fine until lasta Friday I update it to 2.2.6.
Now, when I try to access my drupal site, I see this error in
firefox:
I'm just guessing, but Apache 2.2.6 removed
On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
Have you run revdep-rebuild, or even simply manually re-emerged PHP after
updating Apache?
not sure if all those dir should be empty...
could you please confirm?
I have only php.ini,
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:43:08 +0100
Steve Dommett wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
Have you run revdep-rebuild, or even simply manually re-emerged PHP
after updating Apache?
Both, I always do a revdep-rebuild
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:27:16 +0200
Arnau Bria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why so many changes in this upgrade?¿?
You'd best ask the Apache devs. I thought the changelog for 2.2.6
was quite short myself.
Well, it was more a rhetorical question, but thanks for your reply :-)
A number of
Thank you Fernando for the info. I followed your
instructions and now my pen gets mounted. :))
Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:55:15PM -0300, Fernando Antunes wrote:
On 10/5/07, Fernando
On 10/8/07, Alfredo Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
Desktop settings Behaviour Desktop Icons Choose File/launcher icons
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 10/8/07, Alfredo Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Fernando for the info. I followed your
instructions and now my pen gets mounted. :))
Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
Thanks
Sorry, I don´t know how to do
Helmut Jarausch schrieb:
Hi,
my current default gcc is of version 4.1.2 but I would like to
switch to version 4.2.1.
As root (only) I can do
gcc-config i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.2.1
but this switch is lost after re-login.
Furthermore I cannot switch in non-root mode.
(BTW I'm using the
I'm trying to polish off a gentoo install on a COMPAQ R3000 with
Broadcom 4306 wireless chips...
I can manually setup a solid 54M connection without much effort, but
trying to get it done automatically is troublesome...
I setup a softlevel named wireless. I deleted the net.eth0 hardware
Thank you Liviu
Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/8/07, Alfredo Perez wrote:
Now, I have another question, when I plug the pendrive
does not XFCE should make an icon on my desktop?
Desktop settings Behaviour Desktop Icons Choose File/launcher icons
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:05:56 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Yes. Mount it, (recursivly) change the group of the top level directory
and give group write permissions, then add all users which should have
full access to that group (they need to logout/login to change their
group membership
Tim wrote:
Change the TypesConfig directive in Apache2 to the location of your
mime.types file (in this case, /etc/mime.types).
So I ended up just clobbering my configs and starting over with the
default ones because lots of things were being weird. Now I just have
to figure out how to do a
Arnau Bria wrote:
You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
I actually just did this upgrade as well, and also found php not to work
(and revdep-rebuild didn't catch it). Re-emerge php and look in
/etc/apache2/modules.d for the mod_php file. If you've got that and
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:11:30 -0400
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to polish off a gentoo install on a COMPAQ R3000 with
Broadcom 4306 wireless chips...
I can manually setup a solid 54M connection without much effort, but
trying to get it done automatically is
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2007 schrieb Thufir:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:05:56 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Yes. Mount it, (recursivly) change the group of the top level directory
and give group write permissions, then add all users which should have
full access to that group (they need to
071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
This question Is LVM a good idea? keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
and have yet to find a valid downside for general use.
If you haven't used it, it looks like a questionable extra complexity,
which could bite
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:44:21 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, example. I might be totally wrong, so don't believe me:
The splice system call was added with 2.6.17 and corresponding headers. If
you build an application that has optinal (on compile time) support for
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:25:23 +0200
Arnau Bria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, I needed index.php... but now php does not work!!!
I'm looking for some info in gentoo wiki and I think I have all fine:
APACHE2_OPTS=-D DEFAULT_VHOST -D SSL -D PHP5
in conf.d/apache
And you have
At Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:08:40 +0200 Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether the software compiled against newer headers will still work
depends solely on the kernel. In your example, when you also decide to
run a 2.6.10 kernel, then the software relying on newer features (due
to the
Hello Philip Webb,
If you haven't used it, it looks like a questionable extra complexity,
which could bite your fingers unexpectedly for little real gain.
It' one of those things[1] that you put off using because it looks
complicated. then you get round to trying it and wish you'd done so much
Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
is in (not listed below)
bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16.1 *
[3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.17
[4]
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote:
Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
is in (not listed below)
bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16
[2]
Philip Webb wrote:
071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
This question Is LVM a good idea? keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
and have yet to find a valid downside for general use.
If you haven't used it, it looks like a questionable extra
Liviu Andronic writes:
So, my eternal question, is it realistic for the lost RAM data to be
recovered? That is, after system shutdown, does the data still
physically reside on the RAM and can someone with a decent technology
and know-how recover it? In other words, is this a serious breach in
Not an elegant solution, or one that sheds any light on
the nature of the problem, but this process worked for me:
1) Removed everything from the default run level except for
the system logger and net.eth0.
2) Rebooted and started nfs by hand successfully after the
reboot. Added nfs
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 03:24 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote:
Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
is in (not listed below)
bunyip ~ #
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 04:12:10 W.Kenworthy wrote:
On a mixed stable/unstable x86, which binutils should one generally
use?
So why do you use multislot at all?
On a previous job (long ago now) I was switching gcc's and needed
multislot. Now I dont. I presume if I remove the
Dale wrote:
Philip Webb wrote:
071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
This question Is LVM a good idea? keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
and have yet to find a valid downside for general use.
If you haven't used it, it looks like a
Jim Burwell wrote:
Dale wrote:
Philip Webb wrote:
071008 Alan McKinnon wrote:
This question Is LVM a good idea? keeps cropping up on mailing lists.
I find this a bit strange as I find huge benefits
and have yet to find a valid downside for general use.
38 matches
Mail list logo
