On Saturday 07 June 2008, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On 6/7/08, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I seem to have these set up:
/opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins:/opt/netscape/plugins:/opt/mozilla/plugins:/
usr/lib/mozilla/plugins:/usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins
Is the order in which they are
= KERNELPATH=/lib/modules/2.6.24-gentoo-r8/build all
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
relevant.
* A complete build log is located
at '/var/log/portage/net-wireless:madwifi-ng-0.9.3.3:20080607-150744.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located
at '/var
* Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I don't get the problem correctly, but if you want to work with ebuild
versions I can point you to the versinator.eclass of the portage.
maybe I should clarify my intend a bit more:
I want to build an database which tells whether some release
a.b.c.d of
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:10:57 +0100, Mick wrote:
* Preparing ath_hal module
../scripts/get_arch.mk:44: *** ARCH mismatch: supplied x86,
determined i386. Stop.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224543
--
Neil Bothwick
My friends went to alt.california, and all they brought
me was
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:16:28 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
I guess there's some non-trivial translation process needed.
First I have to cut-off the Gentoo's internal patchlevel
(aka. same upstream release, but updated ebuild),
Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:10:57 +0100, Mick wrote:
* Preparing ath_hal module
../scripts/get_arch.mk:44: *** ARCH mismatch: supplied x86,
determined i386. Stop.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224543
Thank you Neil, just added some
* Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the third
item of output.
Ah, cool. That helps a lot :)
then map
the upstream's versioning schemes to my normalized one.
*If* Gentoo strictly follows the upstream's versioning scheme
2008/6/7, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the third
item of output.
Ah, cool. That helps a lot :)
then map
the upstream's versioning schemes to my normalized one.
*If*
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
- which one gives the least trouble setting up and running?
Thanks for your input everybody. According to /proc/cpuinfo, I'm
running an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+, but it's in 32-bit
mode. I'll go with Sun Java.
--
On 6/6/2008 2:40 AM Mick said the following:
On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Ever since I upgraded my gentoo-sources kernel from 2.6.23 to 2.6.25, I
can no longer see packets on my wireless network for any device other
than my own. The tcpdump output looks like this:
On 6/5/2008 4:49 PM Eric Martin said the following:
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Ever since I upgraded my gentoo-sources kernel from 2.6.23 to 2.6.25,
I can no longer see packets on my wireless network for any device
other than my own. The tcpdump output looks like this:
20:49:32.909144
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
I only need a runtime. I don't know the programming language, so
there's no need for a full-blown development environment.
OK, so I *WAS* going to try the Sun JRE. It seems that there's no
such animal. You have to download the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Dnes wrote:
I only need a runtime. I don't know the programming language, so
there's no need for a full-blown development environment.
OK, so I *WAS* going to try the Sun JRE. It seems that there's no
such animal. You have to
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
I only need a runtime. I don't know the programming language, so
there's no need for a full-blown development environment.
OK, so I *WAS* going to try the Sun JRE. It seems that there's no
such animal. You
14 matches
Mail list logo
