On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:24 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I'm aware that portage uses locking mechanism before modifying 'world'
file, but what about the actual building process ? I'd expect emerge
to check if dependency package is already build/installed (or
currently being build by
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:24 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I'm aware that portage uses locking mechanism before modifying 'world'
file, but what about the actual building process ? I'd expect emerge
to check if dependency package is already build/installed (or
On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a regular
emerges but this new rig is so fast, I can't read it anyway. I did have
a package to fail and it spit out the
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a regular
emerges but this new rig is so fast, I
On Thursday 27 January 2011 15:05:25 YoYo Siska wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:33:21 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a
regular emerges but this new rig is so fast, I can't read it anyway.
I did have a package to
On 01/27/2011 04:16 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:33:21 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a
regular emerges but this new rig is so fast, I can't
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:30:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Using --jobs does a better job of making use of your CPU because one
package can use it fully for compiling while another is configuring.
And what about the last package? The time you gained for faster
configure and install
On 01/27/2011 04:53 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:30:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Using --jobs does a better job of making use of your CPU because one
package can use it fully for compiling while another is configuring.
And what about the last package? The time you
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm updating KDE. It
seems to work fine. It doesn't scroll all the stuff like with a regular
emerges but this new rig is so
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:09 on Thursday 27 January 2011, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
On 01/27/2011 04:53 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:30:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Using --jobs does a better job of making use of your CPU because one
package can
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
You can try, but the second instance with simply block until the lock has
been removed.
I'm not aware of any package system that supports this. I don't think
adding support for this justifies the added complexity.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the 20th
runs at the same speed? Where's the loss there? Even if the last were
slower, it would be worth it.
Given the amount of time unpack/configure/install of most
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:09 on Thursday 27 January 2011, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
Given the amount of time unpack/configure/install of most packages needs
(very short), my observation is that it would not be worth it.
KDE.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:10:02 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Re: Simultaneously emerging multiple packages with same
dependencies:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:12:24 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[snip]
You can try, but the second instance with simply block until the
lock has
Hello,
I'm running a Gentoo Box ~amd64, so, upgrading my system I could notice that
there was 3 python versions.
I have:
Python 2.6
Python 2.7
Python 3.1
It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of Python;
Python 3.1???
Or should I stay in Python 2.6?
Regards,
--
Carlos
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:12:49PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 15:05:25 YoYo Siska wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/27/2011 03:11 PM, Dale wrote:
[...]
I am using the -j option for the first time now. I'm
Carlos Sura wrote:
Hello,
I'm running a Gentoo Box ~amd64, so, upgrading my system I could
notice that there was 3 python versions.
I have:
Python 2.6
Python 2.7
Python 3.1
It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of
Python; Python 3.1???
Or should I stay in Python
On 2011-01-27, Carlos Sura carlos.su...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm running a Gentoo Box ~amd64, so, upgrading my system I could notice that
there was 3 python versions.
I have:
Python 2.6
Python 2.7
Python 3.1
It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of Python;
On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the 20th
runs at the same speed? Where's the loss there? Even if the last were
slower, it would be worth it.
Given the
What is the solution to begin able to paste code I find on the web
into a file in vim and being able to keep the indentation from
changing?
For instance, here's the first few lines of code from a web page:
#define ARRAYSIZE(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(*(x)))
int main(void)
{
const char filename[]
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Carlos Sura
carlos.su...@googlemail.com wrote:
It is safe if I use as main Python 2.7 and as active version of Python;
Python 3.1???
2.7 is pretty safe at this point; I use this as my main version I
haven't hit an issue in a while.
3.1 is probably not such a
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the 20th
runs at the same speed? Where's the loss there? Even if the
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the solution to begin able to paste code I find on the web
into a file in vim and being able to keep the indentation from
changing?
For instance, here's the first few lines of code from a web page:
#define
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I solved it by creating a .vimrc file and putting
set pastetoggle=F2
Running :set paste will do the job as well if you don't want to assign
a hot key for it.
YoYo Siska wrote:
Yes.
It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
Once make started 10 or so process, which ate all my ram, because I
forgot to reenable swap, when I was playing with something before that
:)
yoyo
I noticed the same thing with mine. It used a LOT of ram. I
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Mike Gilbert floppymas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I solved it by creating a .vimrc file and putting
set pastetoggle=F2
Running :set paste will do the job as well if you don't want to assign
a
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
YoYo Siska wrote:
Yes.
It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
Once make started 10 or so process, which ate all my ram, because I
forgot to reenable swap, when I was playing with something before that
:)
yoyo
I noticed the same thing
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:31:13 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
You can use any version you want for your own apps, but as of a couple
weeks ago, I know that switching the Gentoo system apps to Python 3
would break things. If the system apps are still using 2.6 insteadof
2.7, there's probably
On 27 January 2011 14:21, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:31:13 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
You can use any version you want for your own apps, but as of a couple
weeks ago, I know that switching the Gentoo system apps to Python 3
would break things.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:28:47PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I solved it by creating a .vimrc file and putting
set pastetoggle=F2
Running :set paste will do the job as well if you don't want to assign
a hot key
Hello mates,
I'm running Gentoo ~amd64
I try to install compiz-fusion, following the wiki, everything seems to be
fine, but when I try to run compiz-fusion, it works but not so well, because
does not show me windows border, also I put compiz-fusion to use indirect
rendering and loose binding but
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:18:34PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
So on a 20 package world update, only 19 are faster while the
Don't forget to enable window decoration feature (run ccsm) and select your
decorator. I'd recommend using fusion-icon, makes things much more
accessible.
Cheers,
P.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Carlos Sura carlos.su...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hello mates,
I'm running Gentoo ~amd64
I try
On 01/27/2011 12:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Btw, if you're using more instances than the amount of CPUs, the result
will be slow-down.
With the default kernel scheduler, best if amount of CPUs + 1. (On a
4-core, that's -j5).
And if you use emerge's --jobs 2, each of those jobs will
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
YoYo Siska wrote:
Yes.
It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
Once make started 10 or so process, which ate all my ram, because I
forgot to reenable swap, when I
On Thursday 27 January 2011 21:25:02 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
YoYo Siska wrote:
Yes.
It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well.
Once make started 10 or so process,
I have to migrate mailusers from web-cyradm to postfixadmin (sure, on a
gentoo-server - on-topic ;-) ).
Has anyone done that already? AFAI understand I have to export user/pws
and import it in postfixadmin ... I am unsure about the encryption etc.
Maybe someone could help me with infos or a
On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:06:30 YoYo Siska wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:18:34PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
So
Am 27.01.2011 22:52, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I have to migrate mailusers from web-cyradm to postfixadmin (sure, on a
gentoo-server - on-topic ;-) ).
Has anyone done that already? AFAI understand I have to export user/pws
and import it in postfixadmin ... I am unsure about the
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 21:25:02 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
YoYo Siska wrote:
Yes.
It might not be perfect,
On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:06:30 YoYo Siska wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:18:34PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:56:23 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:09:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
So
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:05:22 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 21:25:02 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de
wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale
Mark Knecht markknecht at gmail.com writes:
What is the solution to begin able to paste code I find on the web
into a file in vim and being able to keep the indentation from
changing?
Well, if you want to keep it simple, here is what I do:
edit /etc/vim/vimrc
set ai
On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:18:22 J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:05:22 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Once, when building my kernel, I accidentally forgot to specify the
number of makes and ran make -j
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
I noticed the same thing with mine. It used a LOT of ram. I have 4Gbs
and it was up to about 3Gbs at one point and using some swap as well.
I'm hoping to max out to 16Gbs as soon as I can. May upgrade to a 6 core
CPU too.
I wonder
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:50:57 -0600, Carlos Sura wrote:
So It is safe or not? I'm currently using python 2.7 with no
problems right now or at least I think so... 2.6 and 2.7 are safe,
right.
2.6 and 2.7 are safe, either alone or together. I removed 2.6 from my
desktop nearly four months
kmix will not run. The icon just bounces and then terminates.
Previously, installed kde4 using kde-meta. Rebuilding kde-meta
does not go into all of the individual packages.
I've never had trouble with kmix before, so any guidance
as to what package(s) to rebuild, would be appreciated.
On 01/27/2011 12:21 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I am NOT a NUMBER! I am a DEMOGRAPHIC!
I am NOT a HUSBAND! I am a MARITAL SERVICES PROVIDER!
sigh
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:08:55 James wrote:
kmix will not run. The icon just bounces and then terminates.
Previously, installed kde4 using kde-meta. Rebuilding kde-meta
does not go into all of the individual packages.
I've never had trouble with kmix before, so any guidance
as to
Am 28.01.2011 00:08, schrieb James:
kmix will not run. The icon just bounces and then terminates.
Previously, installed kde4 using kde-meta. Rebuilding kde-meta
does not go into all of the individual packages.
[...]
Ideas or suggestions are most welcome. The machine runs
an identical
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:59:24 Mick wrote:
I'm running i7 Q 720 (4 cores, hyperthreaded) and have MAKEOPTS=-j9
without any slowdown. One or two packages (like OpenOffice) will fail and
need -j=1 to emerge. Otherwise no noticeable drop in desktop
responsiveness.
I have not set up
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:53:04 Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:41 PM, Dale wrote:
I noticed the same thing with mine. It used a LOT of ram. I have 4Gbs
and it was up to about 3Gbs at one point and using some swap as well.
I'm hoping to max out to 16Gbs as soon
53 matches
Mail list logo
