On 3 October 2011 01:42, Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
foo
It's possible that you would prefer zsh's completion style and configurability.
Hi,
I am looking for informations about a VFD (Flourescenz Display)
module.
Its product number is DS M202-MD-07g-2, where DS stands for
Display Systems, which was part of the Hegener Glaser company.
The rest of the product number uses the same numbering scheme as
FUTABA uses for its VFDs but I
On 3 October 2011 01:05, James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 October 2011 01:42, Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
foo
foo? :-)
It's possible that you would prefer zsh's completion style and
configurability.
All right, thank you. I've seen ZSH mentioned
Hi
First of all, sorry if this is not the right forum to post this question.
I'm having a strange problem with urxvt on one of my computers.
When I uses a command which type some text on the screen and then waits for
input, the text does not appear in urxvt until I resize the window, or
forces
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Allan Nielsen a...@awn.dk wrote:
Hi
First of all, sorry if this is not the right forum to post this question.
I'm having a strange problem with urxvt on one of my computers.
When I uses a command which type some text on the screen and then waits for
input,
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda seems consistent, but I don't know why).
What's the recommended way to fix this?
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda
On 2011-10-03, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda seems consistent,
Am 03.10.2011 20:40, schrieb Grant Edwards:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda seems consistent, but I don't know
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-10-03, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1
On 10/03/2011 10:54 AM, Allan Nielsen wrote:
Hi
First of all, sorry if this is not the right forum to post this question.
I'm having a strange problem with urxvt on one of my computers.
When I uses a command which type some text on the screen and then waits
for input, the text does
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bill Longman bill.long...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/03/2011 10:54 AM, Allan Nielsen wrote:
I'm using gentoo, xmonad and urxvt
I have a similar problem with xterm in KDE using radeon. Is that your
environment, too, Allan?
xmonad is a window manager, so he wouldn't
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Grant Edwards
After a bit more googling, it looks like this is what disk labels are
for. Never used them before, but it looks like it's time to give them
a go.
They have the
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 03.10.2011 20:40, schrieb Grant Edwards:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in
On Monday 03 Oct 2011 20:01:16 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 03.10.2011 20:40, schrieb Grant Edwards:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the
Grant Edwards wrote:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda seems consistent, but I don't know why).
What's the
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
They have the advantage over UUID's in that you can set them and
therefore can be human readable. Also, if you use a desktop
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Grant Edwards
After a bit more googling, it looks like this is what disk labels are
for. Never used
On 10/03/2011 12:01 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 03.10.2011 20:40, schrieb Grant Edwards:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda
Am Montag 03 Oktober 2011, 18:40:21 schrieb Grant Edwards:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/sdc1 sometimes result in directory trees in the wrong places
(/dev/sda seems consistent,
On 10/03/2011 12:26 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bill Longman bill.long...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/03/2011 10:54 AM, Allan Nielsen wrote:
I'm using gentoo, xmonad and urxvt
I have a similar problem with xterm in KDE using radeon. Is that your
environment, too, Allan?
On 2011-10-03, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 03.10.2011 20:40, schrieb Grant Edwards:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my
On 2011-10-03, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 03 Oct 2011 20:01:16 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 03.10.2011 20:40, schrieb Grant Edwards:
Just recently I've run in to problems because my hard drives are not
detected in a predictable order, so my fstab that mount /dev/sdb1 and
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:28:05 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
They have the advantage over UUID's in that you can set them and
therefore can be human readable.
You can set the UUIDs yourself too, but I think they have to stick to the
standard format.
Also, if you use a desktop
environment, they
I think separate repositories would only be necessary when using
distributed version control (git) as opposed to centralized
(subversion). I think subversion's path-based authorization should
eliminate the need for separate repositories?
Separate repos aren't strictly necessary, but it's
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think separate repositories would only be necessary when using
distributed version control (git) as opposed to centralized
(subversion). I think subversion's path-based authorization should
eliminate the need for separate
FYI, this is fixed. I ran 'strace startx startx.strace.out 21' and
this showed;
/usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol:
GlxInitVisuals2D
Which means that i forget to eselect opengl set 1, though it wasn't
logged to Xorg.0.log (so it was
I'm not sure if you are overcomplicating this by trying to use Unix
permission. Have you instead considered webdav? You can restrict this
to particular (apache) users/groups, directories, files. It also uses
lockfiles so with two users editing a file simultaneously will cause a
Over the years I've found that the time I spend on the computer has a
negative affect on my mental/emotional health. It seems to suck the
life out of life and impair my ability to function in the real world.
I've tried various things to counteract the problem, but the only
thing that really works
I can't recall if I asked this before, but I am looking at a partition on a
USB stick which seems to have a FAT16 fs on it and in parted says:
==
Model: Crucial Gizmo! overdrive (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 1023MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Over the years I've found that the time I spend on the computer has a
negative affect on my mental/emotional health. It seems to suck the
life out of life and impair my ability to function in the real world.
I've tried various
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if you are overcomplicating this by trying to use Unix
permission. Have you instead considered webdav? You can restrict this
to particular (apache) users/groups, directories, files. It also uses
lockfiles so
Has anyone dealt with this successfully? I'd love to
know how you did it.
You're right to worry about thisand I suspect it's also aging
related. The older I get, the more sensitive I am to how many
hours/day is healthy.
I don't think there is a perfect solution, especially as more and
On Oct 4, 2011 7:01 AM, Matthew Marlowe m...@professionalsysadmin.com
wrote:
Has anyone dealt with this successfully? I'd love to
know how you did it.
You're right to worry about thisand I suspect it's also aging
related. The older I get, the more sensitive I am to how many
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 12:03:47PM -0700, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote
They have the advantage over UUID's in that you can set them and
therefore can be human readable. Also, if you use a desktop
environment, they look nice in file managers.
I assume that name clashes can be avoided by using
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 12:03:47PM -0700, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote
They have the advantage over UUID's in that you can set them and
therefore can be human readable. Also, if you use a desktop
environment, they look
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 12:03:47PM -0700, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote
They have the advantage over UUID's in that you can set them and
therefore can be human readable. Also, if you use a desktop
environment, they look nice in file managers.
I assume that name clashes can
If the data is important, I'd use ddrescue to create an image of the
drive, then run testdisk over that image to see if it can untangle the
partition table mess. Both are in portage.
Hello people!
Now, I have the same question as this guy:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651
I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux?
The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I really
couldn't care less about filesystem performance. But the
On 10/03/2011 10:19 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
If I may add: try a cup of normal (i.e. non-decaf) coffee about 1 hour
after you start using the computer.
Ok, but how do you survive the first hour?
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Hello people!
Now, I have the same question as this guy:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651
I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux?
The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch
On 10/03/2011 05:54 PM, Grant wrote:
Would multiple repos work in a scenario where different developers
have access to different stuff and some stuff should be accessible to
multiple devs? I don't think you want the same stuff in more than one
repo. It seems like managing multiple repos
On 3 October 2011 20:47, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Hello people!
Now, I have the same question as this guy:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651
I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux?
The *most* robust? Probably something seriously expensive from IBM or
On Oct 4, 2011 11:30 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Hello people!
Now, I have the same question as this guy:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651
I.e., what is the most robust filesystem
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Oct 4, 2011 11:30 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Hello people!
Now, I have the same question as this guy:
Windows gives partitions shorter UUID's too, so that's a non-standard thing
on your /etc/fstab. I opted for LABELs.
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd before too long, I'll also mess with decorations, but for
now, I'd like to keep my setup
On 10/03/2011 11:47 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Hello people!
Now, I have the same question as this guy:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651
I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux?
The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I
really
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 19:01, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, this is fixed. I ran 'strace startx startx.strace.out 21' and
this showed;
/usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol:
GlxInitVisuals2D
Which means that i
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Spidey spide...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows gives partitions shorter UUID's too, so that's a non-standard thing
on your /etc/fstab. I opted for LABELs.
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd before too long, I'll
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd before too long, I'll also mess with decorations, but for
now, I'd like to keep my setup simple, no initrd.
AND what bootloaders can use LABEL/UUID? Can grub's device.map use them?
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd before too long, I'll also mess with decorations, but for
now, I'd like to keep my setup simple, no initrd.
AND what bootloaders
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd before too long, I'll also mess with decorations, but for
now, I'd like to keep my setup simple, no initrd.
AND what bootloaders
On Tuesday 04 Oct 2011 04:39:45 Adam Carter wrote:
If the data is important, I'd use ddrescue to create an image of the
drive, then run testdisk over that image to see if it can untangle the
partition table mess. Both are in portage.
Well, that's the thing: I'm not sure that there is a mess.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd before too long, I'll also mess with decorations,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I really
couldn't care less about filesystem performance. But the utility power there
is horrendous, so I need something that can shrug off a catastrophic
You are right: for grub-legacy you need to use the old hd(x,y) thingy.
Which i assume suffers from the same reassignment risk as the kernel's
/dev/sdX naming that prompted this discussion. Looks I'll be moving to
grub2.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 04 Oct 2011 04:39:45 Adam Carter wrote:
If the data is important, I'd use ddrescue to create an image of the
drive, then run testdisk over that image to see if it can untangle the
partition table mess. Both are
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right: for grub-legacy you need to use the old hd(x,y) thingy.
Which i assume suffers from the same reassignment risk as the kernel's
/dev/sdX naming that prompted this discussion. Looks I'll be moving to
grub2.
Am 04.10.2011 07:09, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd before too long, I'll also mess with decorations, but for
now, I'd like to keep my
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 04.10.2011 07:09, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, is it possible to use LABELs without and initrd? I'll start
using an initrd
Fair enough, but chkrootkit is not the most maintained package. Last version
was released in July 2009.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/04/linux_repository_res/
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue 04 Oct 2011 11:11:22 AM IST, Mick wrote:
Fair enough, but chkrootkit is not the most maintained package. Last version
was released in July 2009.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/04/linux_repository_res/
This is a quite old news and since then Linus has moved the kernel to
github
64 matches
Mail list logo
