On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:38:55 -0500
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
The emerge output shows that python would be replaced, and that the
readline USE flag has been set on the previous merge. I also ran
revdep-rebuild, and it found nothing. The python command modules,
from inside
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:38:53AM -0800, Keith Dart wrote
ok, how about the output of:
emerge -pv dev-lang/python:2.7
Did you do something with the readline library?
I never had it installed!!! I assumed that including the line...
dev-lang/python readline ssl xml
...in
Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 18:13, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Then you need to get the layerbreak value from your authoring software and
you
need to tell your authoring software to introduce padding. As mentioned
Hi,
having updated xorg-server from 1.11.3 to 1.11.4 my machine runs havoc.
xdm or slim start as usual, but having entered my password I get a
blank screen or some colored strips and the only escape is via the
famous SysRq sequence.
But, disabling xdm, logging in via a console and using
120130 Philip Webb wrote:
120130 Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2012.01.30 at 12:33 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
120130 YoYo Siska wrote:
Konsole should open the default browser set in KDE.
You can check that in systemsettings - Workspace Appearance and Behavior
- Default Applications - Web
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:17:09AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote
I'll file a bug in bugzilla later today.
Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401651 filed.
--
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office how long before someone makes a
pointless, unrelated Windows insult out of my post pool; I just won $5.
I was using Win95 - and was happy with it
I was using WinNT4 - and was happy with it
I was using Win95 - and was happy with it
I was using Win95 - and
Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office how long before someone makes a
pointless, unrelated Windows insult out of my post pool; I just won $5.
I was using Win3.1 - and was happy with it
I was using Win95 - and was happy with it
I was using WinNT4 - and was happy with it
I was using Win2000 -
Hi,
from time to time I need to boot in 'single' mode.
I'd like to use the nano editor in this case.
But unfortunately it doesn't run since it cannot resolve the dynamic
library libmagic.so.1
How can I build a static version of nano?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote
Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office how long before someone makes a
pointless, unrelated Windows insult out of my post pool; I just won $5.
I was using Win3.1 - and was happy with it
I was using Win95 - and was happy with
Helmut Jarausch writes:
from time to time I need to boot in 'single' mode.
I'd like to use the nano editor in this case.
But unfortunately it doesn't run since it cannot resolve the dynamic
library libmagic.so.1
Probably because you have a separate /usr partition that is not mounted
in
Am Montag, 30. Januar 2012, 20:02:44 schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net [12-01-30 19:40]:
Am 30.01.2012 19:10, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
is there any way (and if yes: how?) to convince kaffeine to connect to
jack?
Thank you very much in
On 01/31/2012 02:53 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
having updated xorg-server from 1.11.3 to 1.11.4 my machine runs havoc.
xdm or slim start as usual, but having entered my password I get a
blank screen or some colored strips and the only escape is via the
famous SysRq sequence.
But,
Can you rely on Xorg devs to ensure that they are not going to break your
multiseat system in the future?
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't know why there would be (much) more
likelihood of regression with Xorg multiseat than with anything else,
including LTSP and all of its dependencies.
I can't seem to get gcc-4.5.3-r1 to compile. I tried twice and it
failed at the exact same point both times. The build log doesn't
mention a segfault. Does anyone know how to fix this? I was able to
compile gcc-4.3.3 a short while ago.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:28 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/31/2012 02:53 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
having updated xorg-server from 1.11.3 to 1.11.4 my machine runs havoc.
xdm or slim start as usual, but having entered my password I get a
blank screen or some colored
* Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [120131 14:26]:
I can't seem to get gcc-4.5.3-r1 to compile. I tried twice and it
failed at the exact same point both times. The build log doesn't
mention a segfault. Does anyone know how to fix this? I was able to
compile gcc-4.3.3 a short while ago.
I can't seem to get gcc-4.5.3-r1 to compile. I tried twice and it
failed at the exact same point both times. The build log doesn't
mention a segfault. Does anyone know how to fix this? I was able to
compile gcc-4.3.3 a short while ago.
On 31-Jan-12 21:36, Grant wrote:
I can't seem to get gcc-4.5.3-r1 to compile. I tried twice and it
failed at the exact same point both times. The build log doesn't
mention a segfault. Does anyone know how to fix this? I was able to
compile gcc-4.3.3 a short while ago.
On 01/31/2012 11:57 AM, Grant wrote:
I can't seem to get gcc-4.5.3-r1 to compile. I tried twice and it
failed at the exact same point both times. The build log doesn't
mention a segfault. Does anyone know how to fix this? I was able to
compile gcc-4.3.3 a short while ago.
Are you using
I can't seem to get gcc-4.5.3-r1 to compile. I tried twice and it
failed at the exact same point both times. The build log doesn't
mention a segfault. Does anyone know how to fix this? I was able to
compile gcc-4.3.3 a short while ago.
Am 31.01.2012 18:15, schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
Hi,
from time to time I need to boot in 'single' mode.
I'd like to use the nano editor in this case.
But unfortunately it doesn't run since it cannot resolve the dynamic
library libmagic.so.1
How can I build a static version of nano?
Many
Am 31.01.2012 20:01, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
Am Montag, 30. Januar 2012, 20:02:44 schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net [12-01-30 19:40]:
Am 30.01.2012 19:10, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
is there any way (and if yes: how?) to convince kaffeine to
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 21:37:34 walt wrote:
The gcc package actually compiles gcc twice, once with your existing
compiler and again with the new compiler itself (at least it worked that
way in the old days).
I believe it's three times now: the first time with the old compiler, then
with
Hey, WinME was a killer app!
MS were really smart with it and if they used the same philosophy with vista,
how different things could have been!
WinME killed so many systems, user experiences and expectations that when 2k
came along every one was so pleased to upgrade (nt4 was never really
Check USE/C flags, there may have been changes between versions (I think this
happened to me) Try compiling without any of them and if it works start
looking for the bad one.
W.Kenworthy
On 01/02/2012, at 5:37, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:57 AM, Grant wrote:
I can't seem
On Tue, January 31, 2012 6:30 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote
Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office how long before someone makes a
pointless, unrelated Windows insult out of my post pool; I just won
$5.
I was using Win3.1 - and was
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Tue, January 31, 2012 6:30 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote
Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office how long before someone makes a
pointless, unrelated Windows insult out of my post pool; I just won
$5.
I was
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:25:37 +0100
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 31.01.2012 18:15, schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
Hi,
from time to time I need to boot in 'single' mode.
I'd like to use the nano editor in this case.
But unfortunately it doesn't run since it cannot resolve
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:07:56AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:17:09AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote
I'll file a bug in bugzilla later today.
Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401651 filed.
A bit more looking at the ebuild, and more testing, reveals that
30 matches
Mail list logo
