Joshua Murphy wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua Murphy wrote:
snip
Well, I don't see why not. As you say, lack of a proper clean up after
a bad shutdown can cause problems. Anything in /run would disappear
after a shutdown, clean or not, since
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Joshua Murphy poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
Well, given that it's there, it cleans up after itself, and it avoids
issues in the instance where /var isn't available early on, is there
much reason _not_ to link /var/run and /var/lock over to their
I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for $X/hour,
or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It makes sense from
a financial perspective to hire programmers directly, but I wonder if
there are benefits to hiring a really good company.
I'm sorry this is OT, but I bet
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Joshua Murphy poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
Well, given that it's there, it cleans up after itself, and it avoids
issues in the instance where /var isn't available early on, is
I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
answers to my original questions:
Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
and I know this is upper limit normally never achieved, but
I want to reduce this upper limit. Is it possible, or is it
hard-coded to half of
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:05:46 +0200
Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
answers to my original questions:
Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
and I know this is upper limit normally never achieved, but
I want to
On Sun, 27 May 2012 04:29:17 +, Joshua Murphy wrote:
Well, given that it's there, it cleans up after itself, and it avoids
issues in the instance where /var isn't available early on, is there
much reason _not_ to link /var/run and /var/lock over to their
respective equivalents on /run?
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:05:46 +0200, Jarry wrote:
I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
answers to my original questions:
Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
and I know this is upper limit normally never achieved, but
I want to reduce this upper
On Sat, 26 May 2012 23:22:22 -0700
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Extensive testing, on the other hand, is something a team should do.
Sure, the lone programmer can write you some unit tests and conduct
a system test, but testing itself is a profession of its own and
should be done by
Am 27.05.2012 08:22, schrieb Grant:
I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for $X/hour,
or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It makes sense from
a financial perspective to hire programmers directly, but I wonder if
there are benefits to hiring a really good
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 09:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:05:46 +0200
Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
answers to my original questions:
Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
and I
I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for $X/hour,
or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It makes sense from
a financial perspective to hire programmers directly, but I wonder if
there are benefits to hiring a really good company.
[snip]
Thank you Florian and
Am Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012, 09:09:26 schrieb Grant:
I'll be getting my feet wet with this shortly. Any other tips
regarding the management of one or more programmers working on various
small web projects? Maybe workflow or any key procedures a newbie
manager should follow?
seriously? asking
I'll be getting my feet wet with this shortly. Any other tips
regarding the management of one or more programmers working on various
small web projects? Maybe workflow or any key procedures a newbie
manager should follow?
seriously? asking those questions? Get a company. Make it their
On 05/26/2012 12:16 AM, Colleen Beamer wrote:
Hi,
Ever since the last time Thunderbird was updated when I synced, the
process does not die when I shut down Thunderbird. I have to kill it
before I can start up Thunderbird again. Is anyone else experiencing
this problem.
Yes, same here.
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:53:22 -0700
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll be getting my feet wet with this shortly. Any other tips
regarding the management of one or more programmers working on
various small web projects? Maybe workflow or any key procedures
a newbie manager should
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:09:26 -0700
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for
$X/hour, or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It
makes sense from a financial perspective to hire programmers
directly, but I wonder if there are
Hi,
I can't emerge any gcc. I tried emerging 4.7, 4.5.3-r2 with no luck.
Should I file a bug?
Thanks,
Ezequiel.
---
Checking multilib configuration for libgomp...
Configuring stage 1 in i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgomp
configure: loading site script /usr/share/config.site
configure: loading site
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Colleen Beamer
colleen.bea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Ever since the last time Thunderbird was updated when I synced, the
process does not die when I shut down Thunderbird. I have to kill it
before I can start up Thunderbird again. Is anyone else experiencing
probably not, you will need some more info as its a bit vague:
What does gcc -v say?
and gcc-config -l
Can you compile anything, either through emerge or manually (i.e., even
a small hello world)
Need to narrow it down.
BillK
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 20:33 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 8:48 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
probably not, you will need some more info as its a bit vague:
What does gcc -v say?
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5/work/gcc-4.4.5/configure
Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I can't emerge any gcc. I tried emerging 4.7, 4.5.3-r2 with no luck.
Should I file a bug?
Thanks,
Ezequiel.
I ran into this a while back and I had to do a emerge -e system then a
emerge -e world. I'm not saying to do this yet but if no one posts a
fix, you
Well, what do you expect out of the PRC, anyway? Good luck.
Terry
This is resulted by company's security policy. I can login in newsgroup at home.
It's OK, at lease mailist was not blocked.
Thank you.
--
Best regards
Wenpin Cui (崔文频）
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PRC
Tel: +86-0571-86726288
On May 28, 2012 6:39 AM, Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I can't emerge any gcc. I tried emerging 4.7, 4.5.3-r2 with no luck.
Should I file a bug?
Thanks,
Ezequiel.
---
Checking multilib configuration for libgomp...
Configuring stage 1 in i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgomp
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 05:17:54PM -0500, Dale wrote
I guess the devs are getting ready for the ultimate screwup udev
and friends is putting in place. Oh well. This is life.
I guess that explains why I have /var/run but no /run on my mdev-based
system. G
--
Walter Dnes
On May 28, 2012 9:11 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 05:17:54PM -0500, Dale wrote
I guess the devs are getting ready for the ultimate screwup udev
and friends is putting in place. Oh well. This is life.
I guess that explains why I have /var/run but
26 matches
Mail list logo
