The 06/09/12, Dale wrote:
But whether it is on tmpfs or just regular memory doesn't matter. Once
emerge starts, everything is in ram including portages work directory
which would be on tmpfs here. That's why it doesn't matter if portage
is on tmpfs or not. Once emerge loads up the files,
The 06/09/12, Dale wrote:
But this is what you guys are missing too. If you want to use tmpfs,
you have to have enough ram to begin with. Whether you use tmpfs or
not, you have to have enough ram to do the compile otherwise you start
using swap or it just crashes. Having ram is a
Hello
yesterday I probably broke my GCC
Problem is following:
When i try to emerge ANY package it fails with this :
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross
The 07/09/12, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
There is another flaw in your assumption above. I already had the
tarballs downloaded BEFORE even the first emerge.
This is not a flaw in assumption. This is negligible.
Fixing myself: s/negligible/out of the scope/
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
yesterday I probably broke my GCC
Problem is following:
When i try to emerge ANY package it fails with this :
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name...
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
yesterday I probably broke my GCC
Problem is following:
When i try to emerge ANY package it fails with this :
checking whether the C
On 2012-09-07 11:49, Andrey Moshbear
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
On 2012-09-07 11:49, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
yesterday I
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
I have *always* kept my prior GCC around for a while, if not until the
next upgrade, just as something to fall back on if the current one breaks.
I am NOT a happy
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:24:44 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
Since always if both versions are in the same slot, which is what I would
expect for a simple upgrade. A major version step would be in a
different slot
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 00:14:00 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:13:04PM +0100, pat wrote
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:00:22 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
Please post contents of /etc/conf.d/net
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 5: Twelve-ounce pound cake
On 07/09/12 14:24, Tanstaafl wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
I have *always* kept my prior GCC around for a while, if not until the
next upgrade, just as something to fall back on if the current
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
I have *always* kept my prior GCC around for a while, if not until the next
upgrade, just as
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 06/09/12, Dale wrote:
But this is what you guys are missing too. If you want to use tmpfs,
you have to have enough ram to begin with. Whether you use tmpfs or
not, you have to have enough ram to do the compile otherwise you start
using swap or it just crashes.
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 06/09/12, Dale wrote:
But whether it is on tmpfs or just regular memory doesn't matter. Once
emerge starts, everything is in ram including portages work directory
which would be on tmpfs here. That's why it doesn't matter if portage
is on tmpfs or not. Once
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
I have *always* kept my
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC
On 2012-09-07, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
This always happens if the gcc your are upgrading to is in the same
slot as the previous one.
Well, I've been managing this gentoo server since I installed it over 8
On 2012-09-07 9:12 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Well, I've been managing this gentoo server since I installed it over 8
years ago, and I don't *ever* recall a GCC upgrade removing my prior
version.
On 2012-09-07 9:22 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Don't be stupid. I see that all the time... if you don't like it just ignore
it.
And calling someone who is trying to help you stupid is not very
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-09-07 9:22 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
Don't be stupid. I see that all the time... if you don't like it just
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I guess the only explanation if what you guys are saying is correct is that
I've never done a minor upgrade for the version in the current slot...
Basically any slotted package works this way. Upgrades within the same
On 2012-09-07 13:04, William Kenworthy
wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
On 2012-09-07 11:49, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrey Moshbear
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
On 2012-09-07 11:49, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:46 AM,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 13:04, William Kenworthy wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
On 2012-09-07 11:49, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com
On 2012-09-07 17:37, Andrey Moshbear
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
On 2012-09-07 11:49,
On 2012-09-07 17:44, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 13:04, William Kenworthy wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
On
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 17:37, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
On 2012-09-07 11:49, Andrey Moshbear
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 17:37, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 17:44, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2012-09-07 13:04, William Kenworthy wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:46 +0200, Samuraiii
On 2012-09-07 18:09, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 17:44, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Samuraiii
On 2012-09-07 18:03, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 17:37, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, William Kenworthy
Am 07.09.2012 14:53, schrieb Tanstaafl:
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 18:09, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2012-09-07 17:44, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Samuraiii
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any tips for gentoo amd64 with core2duo?
Google doesn't seem to give any usable answers (I don't need configure
binhost yet)
While I can make a binpkg for gcc:{4,5,4.6,4.7} or glibc-2.15-r2 on my
c2d-penryn
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Roland Häder r.hae...@web.de wrote:
Weird, I'm on 2.8.0-r1 and didn't have to do any hoop jumping to get
there (~amd64).
Yes, it is really weird thing. :/ I use x86 (i686, my laptop does only
support 32 bit; it is a Thinkpad R51).
Did you check b.g.o to see
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:25:42 -0500, Dale wrote:
Since when you run emerge it loads everything into ram,
regardless of whether portages work directory is on tmpfs or not, it
doesn't matter. This test is NOT about portage loading things into ram
WHILE emerging, it was about having the work
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:26:40 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Well, then this simple little command should help you refresh your
memory. It shows every install and uninstall of gcc on your system.
With 8 years of emerge.log you are good to go
genlop -ul | grep 'sys-devel/gcc-[0-9]'
And
On 2012-09-07 19:38, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any tips for gentoo amd64 with core2duo?
Google doesn't seem to give any usable answers (I don't need configure
binhost yet)
While I can make a binpkg for
Am 07.09.2012 21:52, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:26:40 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Well, then this simple little command should help you refresh your
memory. It shows every install and uninstall of gcc on your system.
With 8 years of emerge.log you are good to go
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:14:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
genlop -ul | grep 'sys-devel/gcc-[0-9]'
And this week's prize for unnecessary use of pipes and grep goes to...
genlop -u sys-devel/gcc
Nope, we not only need the time when gcc was unmerged (-u), but also
when it was
2012/9/8 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:14:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
genlop -ul | grep 'sys-devel/gcc-[0-9]'
And this week's prize for unnecessary use of pipes and grep goes to...
genlop -u sys-devel/gcc
Nope, we not only need the time when gcc
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-09-07 19:38, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Samuraiii samurai.no.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any tips for gentoo amd64 with core2duo?
Google doesn't seem to give any usable
I updated world yesterday, and discovered that bash functionality was
severly degraded on my machine. No up-arrow to scroll through history,
no tab-completion, etc, etc. A bit of Google searching turned up the
fact that bash no-longer uses an internal readline library, but now
depends on the
46 matches
Mail list logo
