On 12/09/2012 05:50:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:18:49 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
config_wlan0=192.168.1.3 netmsk 255.255.255.0
^
If this is a direct paste from your config, there's the problem.
Thanks Neil for spotting this. It was
On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote:
On Tuesday 04 Dec 2012 15:30:04 Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote:
Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel
updates more chips work with the in-kernel driver (brcmsmac). But the
config option is well hidden
On Tuesday 11 Dec 2012 09:04:59 Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote:
On Tuesday 04 Dec 2012 15:30:04 Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote:
Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel
updates more chips work with the in-kernel
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 01:14:39 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Hi,
I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to
mount because
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 01:14:39 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Hi,
I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to
mount because
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 04:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
What is the end-result without the lines?
localmount fails at mounting /var /home and /tmp (while swap gets
mounted which is *also* on LVM because lvm starts up before the swap
gets activated).
I use an older version still.
In
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 04:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
SNIP
Which metadata version did you use for the software raid setup?
Can you add mdadm to the boot-runlevel?
I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
kernel based autodetect.
Ouch, auto-detect does not
For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking things
so if ifconfig cant be relied on, what's normally used to extract an
interfaces IP
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:33:15 +0800
Bill Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking
things so if
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
kernel based autodetect.
Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
Please read the man-page section:
Please rebuild the raid-device using v0.90 metadata
On 12/11/2012 12:33:15 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking
things
so if ifconfig cant be relied on,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:08:12 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
kernel based autodetect.
Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
Please read the man-page section:
===
--auto-detect
Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arrays. This can only
work if md is compiled into the kernel - not if it is
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:08:12 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
kernel based autodetect.
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
Please read the man-page section:
===
--auto-detect
Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arrays. This can
only
work if md is compiled into the kernel - not if it is
On Dec 11, 2012 7:57 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
Please read the man-page section:
===
--auto-detect
Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set
emerge: no targets left after set expansion
So you have nothing that needs rebuilding. Portage will warn you when the
set it
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
I have these disks, use 'em. When I've figured out the actual
quotas and sizes I need, I'll let you know. Meanwhile just get on
with it and store my stuff in some reasonable fashion, 'mkay?
kthankxbye! I have
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:36:10 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
So you have nothing that needs rebuilding. Portage will warn you when
the set is non-empty, telling you to run emerge @preserved-rebuild.
There is no need to run it at any other time.
After using Gentoo for close to two years, the
Issue resolved guys. Thanks to J. Roeleveld for pointing out that auto
detection is failing.
I built an initramfs using genkernel with raid and lvm support and added
options domdadm lvmraid.
It works flawlessly now.
Thanks! :-)
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
http://nileshgr.com
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:33:15 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote about
[gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address:
For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
latest update has changed the output format of
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Exactly the reason why I wanted RAID0 and LVM in combination: more
IOPS. ZFS looks very interesting, how stable is it?
On Linux, not at all (it doesn't exist there except using fuse)
On
On 12/11/2012 08:36 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set
emerge: no targets left after set expansion
So you have nothing that needs rebuilding. Portage
Hello list
Long time no read... :)
It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line below.
TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook.
I have the luck of having obtained a used netbook for free (Atom N450, single-
core with HT, 1 GB memory,
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes:
Then use burnp6. Or burnmmx. Same packacke. No winecrap.
OK thanks for the input.
Thank for all the help.
James
I can send you the source code if you want. Likewise to any other
interested reader
Send to me please, Thanks
--
___
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to
On 12/11/2012 03:04, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote:
This sounds scary!!! Isn't there a way of disabling this feature in
the BIOS?
With HP, you don't even get a BIOS setup. You get something that tells
you the processor temperature and possibly lets you change the boot
order.
If my package.mask is empty, eix-test-obsolete runs fine. If I have
this in package.mask:
*/*::init6
eix-test-obsolete find over 27,000 packages under this heading:
Redundant in /etc/portage/package.mask:
... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_MASK_NO_CHANGE
Adding the following to
On 11 December 2012 12:36, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello list
. . .
So I’m interested in you opinion and own experience about the following
arising questions:
* From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an
Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I
in package.mask:
*/*::init6
eix-test-obsolete find over 27,000 packages under this heading:
Redundant in /etc/portage/package.mask:
... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_MASK_NO_CHANGE
The reason for this is the following:
Since the category and package is */*, your mask can match every
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
I was using eix a bit ago and I noticed the colors have changed. Since
I like to have white text and a black background, this is not working to
well for me. It seems some of the output is black text. Put black text
on
This really freaks out eix-test-obsolete. Does anyone know of a way to
install only certain packages from a layman overlay and
use eix-test-obsolete?
I don't add such overlays to make conf. Instead, I symlink directories
for
the packages I want into my local overlay.
I did that, too.
Am 11.12.2012 18:36, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
Hello list
Long time no read... :)
It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line
below.
TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook.
I have the luck of having obtained a used
I have: Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz
running it with:
CFLAGS=-march=core2 -O2 -pipe
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
MAKEOPTS=-j5
CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Didn't run any test performance on it, but the only disappointing fact about
this small box is that it will not reboot itself when the power goes down.
I also get 376 matches from Not installed but in
/etc/portage/package.mask which are surely the packages in my overlays
masked by */* but not installed. Do you know the name of this test so I
can disable it in eixrc?
REDUNDANT_IF_IN_MASK (or in /etc/portage/package.nowarn: in_mask)
I think
Is there a way to remove Cron root@hostname from the subject line of
crontab mail without piping each cron job to 'mail'?
I set 'usermod -c hostname root' on each of my systems so that the From:
line displays hostname for crontab mail. This works on each system
except the mail server itself
I think what we really need is a better way
to install only certain packages from an overlay.
This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain packages
copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole overlay
to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do not use
Well I have a gentoo system I'm trying to recover.
I've got it booted up via systemrescue.
I do not have a copy of the fstab, so what is the best
way to discover which partitions are /boot / and so on?
(brain dead tonight)
I guesses but the / is blank?
df snip
/dev/sda2
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:32:01 -0800, Grant wrote:
This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain
packages copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole
overlay to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do not use
eclasses or other ebuilds from the overlay
mount them and see whats there?
also, what order did you mount them in? it may make a difference
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Well I have a gentoo system I'm trying to recover.
I've got it booted up via systemrescue.
I do not have a copy of the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:48:03PM +, James wrote:
I guesses but the / is blank?
df snip
/dev/sda2 61438696 51276944 10161752 84% /mnt/gentoo/boot
/dev/sda3 61438696 51276944 10161752 84% /mnt/gentoo
/mnt/gentoo/boot is populated (mounted correctly)
mount them and see whats there?
Also, check the partition table to see which one is swap, and what other
partitions exist.
This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain
packages copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole
overlay to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do not use
eclasses or other ebuilds from the overlay which might contain
corresponding
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:20:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
* From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an
Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to assume thus that the Atom
architecture doesn’t have much to offer to 64 bit (such as extra
Bruce Hill daddy at happypenguincomputers.com writes:
Start by issuing blkid to determine what partitions are there. If you use -L
with mkfs.whatever then you should have a label, such as this:
peter ~ # blkid
/dev/sda1: LABEL=root UUID=73362905-79dc-4512-9518-4c040963f80e
TYPE=xfs
I
OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3)
to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine
One got hosed. Error message upon reboot
config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration
for this version of udev to run successfully
this requires immediate action
mdev: sys/class no such file
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
looking into : /mnt/gentoo/new/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev
I cannot tell what version of udev (udev mount)
and others (udev-init-scipts ?) were installed
and how to roll this back.
OK so on one of my working systems, I have
sys-fs/udev-171-r9
On Wednesday 12 December 2012 08:07:46 AM IST, James wrote:
OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3)
to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine
One got hosed. Error message upon reboot
config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration
for this version of udev to run
On Wednesday 12 December 2012 08:19 AM, James wrote:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
looking into : /mnt/gentoo/new/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev
I cannot tell what version of udev (udev mount)
and others (udev-init-scipts ?) were installed
and how to roll this back.
OK so on one
On 12/11/2012 04:15 PM, Grant wrote:
Is there a way to remove Cron root@hostname from the subject line of
crontab mail without piping each cron job to 'mail'?
I set 'usermod -c hostname root' on each of my systems so that the From:
line displays hostname for crontab mail. This works on each
For some reason, when I mount floppy disk (standard HD 3.5 VFAT disk)
it does nothing. No error, just nothing... I have not tried this in
well over a year, but it used to work.
The /dev/fd0 device works normally, I can access it with mtools and
use dd and even access disks in virtual machines
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:46:19 -0500
Randy Barlow ra...@electronsweatshop.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Exactly the reason why I wanted RAID0 and LVM in combination: more
IOPS. ZFS looks very interesting, how
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:36:10 -0600
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set
emerge: no targets left after set expansion
53 matches
Mail list logo
