Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 21.09.2013 23:49, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: OK, so I conducted another experiment, to see if I was able to make systemd *not* to work with an exotic combination of underlying storage. I did the following: - 4 drives, all of them in RAID5. - The resulting /dev/md127 was put in a

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.09.2013 09:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Yes, I reported this issue back then ... but I don't have the encrypted swap in /etc/fstab. I only have: # cat /etc/crypttab swap /dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M080G2GC_CVPO015404LR080JGN-part5 /dev/urandom

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with understanding that strange escaping etc ... :-( I have now: # cat /etc/systemd/system/dev-disk-by\\x2did-dm\\x2dname\\x2dswap.swap [Unit] #After=systemd-cryptsetup.service

Re: [gentoo-user] re: scrolling not seamless in firefox/thunderbird

2013-09-23 Thread Joakim Gebart
2013/9/22 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com On 09/21/2013 06:32 PM, Al wrote: Bruce Hill wrote: I have Use smooth scrolling checked and no such wavy line anywhere. Hmmm I just tried Firefox, and get the wavy line when Use smooth scolling is checked (scrolling with

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Tanstaafl
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... On 2013-09-23 4:21 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.09.2013 13:00, schrieb Tanstaafl: Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... I understand that, yes ... it is unnecessary complex from my point of view as well. Swap that is encrypted from scratch everytime you boot up isn't the

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Sep 23, 2013 3:22 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with understanding that strange escaping etc ... :-( I have now: # cat

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... Please don't top post. After I got LVM2, mdraid, and LUKS working with systemd, I just decided that, for me, neither LVM2,

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-23 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2013-09-23 10:37 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... Please don't top

Re: [gentoo-user] re: scrolling not seamless in firefox/thunderbird

2013-09-23 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 09/23/2013 11:46 AM, Joakim Gebart wrote: 2013/9/22 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com mailto:alexander.kaps...@gmail.com On 09/21/2013 06:32 PM, Al wrote: Bruce Hill wrote: I have Use smooth scrolling checked and no such wavy line anywhere. Hmmm

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Chromium resubmits forms without prompt

2013-09-23 Thread Grant
On both my laptop and my wife's laptop, Chromium is reposting form data if I click back to a form page or if the browser restores a tab which is a form page. Actually refreshing a form page prompts me as it should. This is pretty dangerous and has caused me quite a few problems. I've

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

2013-09-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote: Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? Google wasn't very helpful. [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required.

[gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

2013-09-23 Thread Grant
Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? Google wasn't very helpful. [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. [Hardware Error]: CPU:3 (10:2:3) MC1_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|-]:

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

2013-09-23 Thread Grant
Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? Google wasn't very helpful. [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. [Hardware Error]: CPU:3 (10:2:3) MC1_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|-]:

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

2013-09-23 Thread Ralf Ramsauer
What kind of architecture / CPU? I suppose it's an AMD CPU as this error is thrown by drivers/edac/mce_amd.c: $ cd /usr/src/linux; fgrep -R MC1 Error drivers/edac/mce_amd.c: pr_emerg(HW_ERR MC1 Error: ); $ fgrep -R Copyback Parity/Victim error drivers/edac/mce_amd.c:

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

2013-09-23 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am 23.09.2013 20:59, schrieb Paul Hartman: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote: Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? Google wasn't very helpful. [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. [Hardware Error]: Error

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

2013-09-23 Thread Ralf Ramsauer
I share this opinion. The message says - even if the error was corrected - that there's something dramatically wrong with your - i suppose - CPU. Corrected error might imply, that some low-level feature got disabled in order to prevent furher errors. Does this error appear only once at early boot

Re: [gentoo-user] [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error.

2013-09-23 Thread Ralf Ramsauer
I had a deeper look into the kernel sources: Your error message is exactly thrown by static bool k8_mc1_mce(u16 ec, u8 xec) So probably you have a K8 ;-) Have a look at: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2007-October/msg00075.html It *might* be an error concerning ECC error