Am Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:11:31 -0500
schrieb Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:02:08PM +0200, Gevisz wrote
2. I am not sure but my guess is that the gstreamer allows me to watch
the video from youtube (partially), edX, cousera, etc. in a web-browser
(I
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:46:16 +0100 (CET)
Alain Didierjean alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Cannot emerge graphviz :
ERROR: media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r4::gentoo failed (prepare phase):
* (no error message)
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_prepare
*
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules and header
* The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
* or edited. This script cannot deal
On 14 February 2015 11:33:49 GMT+00:00, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk
wrote:
Hello list,
What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne to
me:
$ alias perl-cleaner
alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg --jobs=3
--keep-going'
$
Hi all,
I was looking for information about the source for checksums of installed
files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage makes checksums
(for equery check) from installed files in /, or in /var/tmp/portage. And
similarly whether it makes binary packages (when asked) from /, or
Cannot emerge graphviz :
ERROR: media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r4::gentoo failed (prepare phase):
* (no error message)
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_prepare
* environment, line 5657: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* cp
On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 03:51:12 Joseph wrote:
On 02/13/15 20:44, Joseph wrote:
On 02/13/15 22:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 02/13/2015 09:50 PM, Joseph wrote:
I have a hard time finding any documentation on how to print over VPN.
I have a network printer and I would like to setup my
On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 12:19:54 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25
On 02/14/2015 10:36 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:24:21 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
I was looking for information about the source for checksums of
installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage
makes checksums (for equery check) from installed files in
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:24:26PM -0200, Urs Schütz wrote:
On 02/13/15 16:19, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
Hi guys,
If you have mesa and eselect-opengl-1.3.X installed, could you please
tell me if the symlink /usr/include/GL/glext.h is broken for you?
Thanks,
Valid symlink here:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules and header
* The following files remain.
On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 12:19:54 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:24:21 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
I was looking for information about the source for checksums of
installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage
makes checksums (for equery check) from installed files in /, or
in /var/tmp/portage. And similarly
It looks like /etc/systemd/system/network@.service requires a gateway=
line, however, for a second interface I wont set another default. Is there
a standard way to so this, or do i have to copy network@.service to a new
name and remove the 'ip route add' line?
Where this service unit file
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules and header
* The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
* or edited. This script cannot deal with them.
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.16.3/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini
Hello list,
What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne to me:
$ alias perl-cleaner
alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg --jobs=3
--keep-going'
$ perl-cleaner
***
You
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk
wrote:
Hello list,
What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne to me:
$ alias perl-cleaner
alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg --jobs=3
--keep-going'
$ perl-cleaner
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:33:49 +
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hello list,
What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne
to me:
$ alias perl-cleaner
alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg
--jobs=3 --keep-going' $ perl-cleaner
Bill Kenworthy billk at iinet.net.au writes:
rpm is just a wrapper around a an archive with instructions on how to
build and or install it. I have more experience with rpm's but I
believe debs are the same. Just unwrap your .rpm/.deb file of choice
and install it manually (the
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
I see you are doing more than I thought you were doing
rpms and debs are both cpio files so the easy way is to unpack them and
see what's going on:
rpm2cpio name.rpm | cpio -iv --make-directories
dpkg -x somepackage.deb ~/temp/
On 02/14/2015 03:52 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Jan Sever n...@email.cz wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking for information about the source for checksums of installed
files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage makes checksums
(for equery check) from
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:26:33 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
I was looking for information about the source for checksums of
installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage
makes checksums (for equery check) from installed files in /, or
in /var/tmp/portage. And
On Saturday 14 February 2015 12:56:09 bitlord wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:33:49 +
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hello list,
What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne
to me:
$ alias perl-cleaner
alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
I doubt dpkg and rpm aren't going to be much use to you, unless you
really want to run two package managers. Besides, both are not
especially useful with the front ends apt* and yum.
I'd just use those to unpackage and maybe preprocess
On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules and header
* The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
* or edited. This script cannot deal with them.
On 02/13/2015 10:44 PM, Joseph wrote:
Thank for replying.
My eeepc VPN IP: 192.168.151.9 is the client connected over VPN to server
VPN IP 192.168.151.1
So I inserted on eeepc (client) to /etc/openvpn/eeepc.conf
...
push route 192.168.151.0 255.255.255.0
This goes on the server,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14/02/2015 17:42, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:26:33 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
I was looking for information about the source for checksums of
installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage
makes checksums (for equery check) from installed files in
On Saturday 14 February 2015 14:50:05 Jan Sever wrote:
On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
There's a good reason I didn't answer that part of the question...
Good reason? I don't understand.
He meant he didn't have an answer for you.
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Saturday 14 February 2015 14:46:01 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...] you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
required would be pulled in as dependencies.
I didn't know that. Thanks. I seem to have
On 13/02/15 20:52, James wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system.
repos.conf system is very cool; thanks for posting about it;
but it's brand new to me [...]
Does this system effect epatch user, as in where the patches
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Jan Sever n...@email.cz wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking for information about the source for checksums of installed
files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage makes checksums
(for equery check) from installed files in /, or in /var/tmp/portage. And
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules and header
* The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
On 14/02/2015 17:42, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left
On 02/14/2015 03:02 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 14 February 2015 14:50:05 Jan Sever wrote:
On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
There's a good reason I didn't answer that part of the question...
Good reason? I don't understand.
He meant he didn't have an answer for you.
On Saturday 14 February 2015 11:53:23 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Your use of -- to supply extra arguments to emerge. It means you may
be using unsupported options so if it breaks, the pieces are all
yours.
Yes, I can read the words, Neil ;-) I just want to know whether it's
safe to ignore the
On 14/02/2015 16:11, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 14 February 2015 11:53:23 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Your use of -- to supply extra arguments to emerge. It means you may
be using unsupported options so if it breaks, the pieces are all
yours.
Yes, I can read the words, Neil ;-) I just
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 12:13:25 schrieb Alexander Kapshuk:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules and header
* The following files remain. These were
Shouldn't all participating in this thread have corrected by now the
message's subject, for archiving purposes?
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 12:13:25 schrieb Alexander Kapshuk:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules and header
* The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
* or edited. This script cannot deal with them.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
Shouldn't all participating in this thread have corrected by now the
message's subject, for archiving purposes?
Thanks for spotting and correcting it.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:11:25 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
There's a good reason I didn't answer that part of the question...
Good reason? I don't understand.
He meant he didn't have an answer for you.
Ah, I see now. I should
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:11:32 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Your use of -- to supply extra arguments to emerge. It means you may
be using unsupported options so if it breaks, the pieces are all
yours.
Yes, I can read the words, Neil ;-) I just want to know whether it's
safe to ignore
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:39:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Don't feel too bad, it's one of my favourite geeky Unix trivia factoid
questions. In 10 years, no-one yet has given the correct answer
immediately!
You need to ask better people :P
It's also very rare to have a file owned by root in
46 matches
Mail list logo
