Re: [gentoo-user] weird (?) dependency is blocking freeze

2016-02-27 Thread Franz Fellner
> > Calculating dependencies... done! > > media-libs/mlt-0.9.0 pulled in by: > > media-video/openshot-1.4.3 requires > > >=media-libs/mlt-0.8.2[ffmpeg,frei0r,gtk,melt,python,sdl,xml] > > > > Checking the kind of packages: > > > > * app-arch/freeze > > Available versions: 2.5.0-r1 >

Re: [gentoo-user] weird (?) dependency is blocking freeze

2016-02-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 28/02/2016 08:09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install app-packer/freeze and got this: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild N ] app-arch/freeze-2.5.0-r1 > [blocks B ] media-libs/mlt[melt] ("media-libs/mlt[melt]" is blocking > app-arch/freeze-2.5.0-r1)

[gentoo-user] weird (?) dependency is blocking freeze

2016-02-27 Thread Meino . Cramer
Hi, I tried to install app-packer/freeze and got this: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N ] app-arch/freeze-2.5.0-r1 [blocks B ] media-libs/mlt[melt] ("media-libs/mlt[melt]" is blocking app-arch/freeze-2.5.0-r1) * Error: The above package list contains packages which

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

2016-02-27 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2/26/2016 1:14 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> I recall a list conversation about this, explaining that it would be >> trivial for someone who knows how to do ebuilds, to have their own >>

Re: [gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:40:06 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all > seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all > packages, libreoffice seems to want only python3: > > I can set it in make.conf but as expected

Re: [gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Todd Goodman
* Alan McKinnon [160227 14:42]: > I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all > seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all > packages, libreoffice seems to want only python3: I was in the same position until my last

[gentoo-user] Re: using package.provided

2016-02-27 Thread Harry Putnam
Nikos Chantziaras writes: > On 26/02/16 18:47, Harry Putnam wrote: >> First off, thanks to all posters for the excellent input >> >>> Nikos Chantziaras writes: >> >>> On 25/02/16 05:55, Harry Putnam wrote: I'd like to stay on kernel-4.1.6, rather than

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 27/02/2016 22:27, »Q« wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:40:06 +0200 > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all >> seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all >> packages, libreoffice seems to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 27/02/2016 22:22, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 27/02/16 22:04, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> There are still way too many packages requiring python-2.7 that >> don't support python-3 at all. > > Hm. I only have one such package: app-text/asciidoc. That's out of 1227 > total packages installed. > >

[gentoo-user] Re: PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:40:06 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all > seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all > packages, libreoffice seems to want only python3: > > I can set it in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 27/02/2016 22:16, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 27/02/16 21:40, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all >> seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all >> packages, libreoffice seems to want only python3: >> >> I can set

[gentoo-user] Re: PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 27/02/16 22:04, Alan McKinnon wrote: There are still way too many packages requiring python-2.7 that don't support python-3 at all. Hm. I only have one such package: app-text/asciidoc. That's out of 1227 total packages installed.

[gentoo-user] Re: PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 27/02/16 21:40, Alan McKinnon wrote: I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all packages, libreoffice seems to want only python3: I can set it in make.conf but as expected that causes all manner of

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] good alternative to Firefox extension "Ghostery"

2016-02-27 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 07:14:59 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Question is: Are there any other comparable good alternatives, > which understand the term "privacy" as it is ? Disconnect, , uses the same basic idea as Ghostery, but Disconnect

Re: [gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 27/02/2016 21:59, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 09:40:06PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all >> seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all >> packages, libreoffice seems to want only

Re: [gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 09:40:06PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all > seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all > packages, libreoffice seems to want only python3: I don't know much about them either. >

[gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET & libreoffice

2016-02-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
I don't know much about PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET and PYTHON_TARGET, it all seemed to just work so I never looked further. Until now. Of all packages, libreoffice seems to want only python3: I can set it in make.conf but as expected that causes all manner of other packages to fail emerge checks as

[gentoo-user] Problem with gcc5 and VirtualBox

2016-02-27 Thread walt
I routinely use a virtual gentoo ~amd64 machine in VirtualBox for debugging software problems and yesterday I found one after switching from gcc-4.9.3 to gcc-5.3.0 (in the gentoo guest). After emerging mesa-11.1.2-r1 I noticed that a game wouldn't start, and after several hours of debugging I

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

2016-02-27 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 27 February 2016 08:15:47 Daniel Frey wrote: --->8 > The brackets mean the USE flag is forced, masked or removed. > > (if you want to jump to the section in `man emerge` search for () using > "/\(\)" as searching for verbose or -v shows results everywhere) Actually, that search

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

2016-02-27 Thread Daniel Frey
On 02/27/2016 07:18 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 27 February 2016 14:58:25 I wrote: >> On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

2016-02-27 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 27 February 2016 14:58:25 I wrote: > On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install > > > www- > > > client/chromium without all the bloat?

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

2016-02-27 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www- > > client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for > > > > any of these: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

2016-02-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www- > client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for > any of these: > > app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher >

[gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

2016-02-27 Thread Peter Humphrey
Hello list, I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www- client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for any of these: app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher app-accessibility/espeak media-sound/sox

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] good alternative to Firefox extension "Ghostery"

2016-02-27 Thread Dale
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Arve Barsnes [16-02-27 10:24]: >> On 27 February 2016 at 07:14, wrote: >>> Question is: Are there any other comparable good alternatives, >>> which understand the term "privacy" as it is ? >>> >> I'm not sure I understand

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] good alternative to Firefox extension "Ghostery"

2016-02-27 Thread Heiko Baums
Am 27.02.2016 um 07:14 schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de: > with one of the latest updates the Firefox plugin/extension > "Ghostery", which blocks trackers mutated: > Before all setting were handled local, now everything can only > be done by creating an account at https://www.ghostery.com. That's

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] good alternative to Firefox extension "Ghostery"

2016-02-27 Thread Meino . Cramer
Arve Barsnes [16-02-27 10:24]: > On 27 February 2016 at 07:14, wrote: > > Question is: Are there any other comparable good alternatives, > > which understand the term "privacy" as it is ? > > > I'm not sure I understand the distinction, and I still

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] good alternative to Firefox extension "Ghostery"

2016-02-27 Thread Arve Barsnes
On 27 February 2016 at 07:14, wrote: > Question is: Are there any other comparable good alternatives, > which understand the term "privacy" as it is ? > I'm not sure I understand the distinction, and I still have both installed, but Privacy Badger, created by the EFF, seems