Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

On April 19, 2016 12:34:35 AM GMT+02:00, James wrote: >Corbin charter.net> writes: > > >> Understanding should not hinge on other peoples convenience. > >If you look at the Subject and then read the (naked) post, >it does make sense. This thread is much ado about

Re: [gentoo-user] make oldconfig ?

On 04/18/2016 07:01 PM, James wrote: > Hello, > > After copying the current ".config" to the newly linked sources > (/usr/src/linux) I use to run 'make oldconfig'. Now, looking at > the gentoo wiki [1] I see (2) choices but no 'make oldconfig':: > > 1) #make silentoldconfig > > 2) #make

[gentoo-user] make oldconfig ?

Hello, After copying the current ".config" to the newly linked sources (/usr/src/linux) I use to run 'make oldconfig'. Now, looking at the gentoo wiki [1] I see (2) choices but no 'make oldconfig':: 1) #make silentoldconfig 2) #make olddefconfig 3) #make oldconfig (3) still seems to work.

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

Neil Bothwick wrote: > That's not the point. lol +1 -- Regards wabe

[gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

gmx.de> writes: > Hi, > He uses > kadu 3.0 windows and I tried kadu-2.1 GENTOO. Maybe file a bug requesting that the gentoo dev upgrade the package ebuild for kadu to 3.0? It seems to be widely available. # equery m kadu Maintainer: reave...@gentoo.org (Maciej Mrozowski) Perhaps a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

James wrote: > Corbin charter.net> writes: > > >> Understanding should not hinge on other peoples convenience. > If you look at the Subject and then read the (naked) post, > it does make sense. This thread is much ado about nothing, imho. > > Mobile posters, often cut more than one would at a

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

That's not the point. -- Neil Bothwick Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today. pgp7epoH80uhB.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:34:35 + (UTC), James wrote: > > Understanding should not hinge on other peoples convenience. > > If you look at the Subject and then read the (naked) post, > it does make sense. This thread is much ado about nothing, imho. It makes more sense than his unquoted

[gentoo-user] Re: Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

Corbin charter.net> writes: > Understanding should not hinge on other peoples convenience. If you look at the Subject and then read the (naked) post, it does make sense. This thread is much ado about nothing, imho. Mobile posters, often cut more than one would at a workstation, or top post.

Re: [gentoo-user] Calm

On Saturday 16 April 2016 14:48:51 Alan Mackenzie wrote: >Hello, Gentoo. > >I'm just saying hello to confirm I'm still here. > >For many months now, Gentoo has simply worked for me, without problems. >I sync my system several times a week, and emerge just works. > >The last bit of excitement I had

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

On 04/18/2016 05:12 PM, Corbin wrote: On 04/18/2016 04:44 PM, Dale wrote: R0b0t1 wrote: > >I never found it inconvenient. Complicated discussions will have me >reply inline. > It isn't about YOUR convenience. It's about the other 1,000's of people that subscribe to this list.

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

On 04/18/2016 04:44 PM, Dale wrote: R0b0t1 wrote: > >I never found it inconvenient. Complicated discussions will have me >reply inline. > It isn't about YOUR convenience. It's about the other 1,000's of people that subscribe to this list. Incomplete snippets of conversations lead to

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

R0b0t1 wrote: > > I never found it inconvenient. Complicated discussions will have me > reply inline. > It isn't about YOUR convenience. It's about the other 1,000's of people that subscribe to this list. Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

On April 18, 2016 11:39:10 PM GMT+02:00, R0b0t1 wrote: >I never found it inconvenient. Complicated discussions will have me >reply >inline. You have never found what inconvenient? Please follow the rules of this (and every other technical) mailinglist. -- Sent from my Android

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

I never found it inconvenient. Complicated discussions will have me reply inline.

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

On 18/04/2016 23:11, R0b0t1 wrote: > No. How much harder does it make it to follow? > It makes it *much* harder to know what you are answering to. To find that out, I have to find and click on the previous email, see that person's message then go back to yours and fit both together in my brain.

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

On April 18, 2016 9:20:01 PM GMT+02:00, R0b0t1 wrote: >Pidgin OTR works and supports jabbering. No idea on your original >problem, >sorry. Can you please quote properly? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

No. How much harder does it make it to follow?

Re: [gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

Pidgin OTR works and supports jabbering. No idea on your original problem, sorry.

[gentoo-user] Kadu 2.1...OTR / Encryption defunct ???

Hi, is something known about the status of OTR/encrypted chat via Jabber/ XMPP with kadu 2.1 ? This evening I was trying to get such a connection with a friend. We configured kadu simulatanously while talking on the phone. He uses kadu 3.0 windows and I tried kadu-2.1 GENTOO. Th econfiguration

[gentoo-user] Excitement...

...and disappointment... Hello list, A month or so ago I asked here for recommendations for a graphics card to do mucho GPU calculations, as I was buying a new system. Well, two weeks ago today the new system arrived. It took me five whole days to find a way to get it to boot, what with its

Re: [gentoo-user] suppressing the 'would you like to add --pretend' prompt when using emerge --ask

On Sunday 17 Apr 2016 12:57:30 »Q« wrote: > I never want to add --pretend to the options; if I've used --ask, > I also meant to use sudo. I've looked through the documentation and > couldn't find a way to stop emerge from prompting me about --pretend, > so now I'm asking you if I've overlooked

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: LibreOffice problem importing file : solved

On Sunday 17 Apr 2016 23:00:45 Dale wrote: > Philip Webb wrote: > > PS what does 'tl;dr' mean ? -- I've seen it in other msgs. > > To long; didn't read. I'm fairly sure that is it. Actually, too long; didn't read. > Dale > > :-) :-) :-) -- Rgds Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: VLC could not decode the opus audio

2016-04-17 22:18 GMT+03:00 »Q« : > On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 20:49:06 +0300 > gevisz wrote: > >> 2016-04-17 20:45 GMT+03:00 gevisz : >> > 2016-04-17 19:12 GMT+03:00 »Q« : > >> >> I'm pretty sure what happened was that vlc had a