On 26/06/2016 00:14, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2016, 16:31:22 schrieb Alan Grimes:
Hello, Let me introduce myself again.
[snip]
Alan is currently enjoying a vacation from the list. No point in replying
anymore.
What
On Jun 25, 2016 9:31 AM, "Alan Grimes" wrote:
... have you seen a doctor about that?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2016, 16:31:22 schrieb Alan Grimes:
> Hello, Let me introduce myself again.
[snip]
Alan is currently enjoying a vacation from the list. No point in replying
anymore.
- --
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 22:18:39 +0200, Helmut Jarausch
(jarau...@skynet.be) wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] booting - I don't
anystand how the (Linux) world works anymore" (in
):
> On 06/25/2016 09:39:32 PM,
Yes, thanks, that did it,
Helmut
On 06/25/2016 10:19:12 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
>
> I'm a dino since I still use grub-1 but I prefer recent kernels
(currently
> 4.70-rc4)
>
> I don't understand the 'root=' option on the
Thanks Rich for the explanation.
Yes, I don't use an initramfs as it's not necessary in my simple case.
Fortunately, Jeremy's hint to use root=PARTUUID= works just fine
(if one knows about it)
Helmut
On 06/25/2016 09:46:21 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> I'm a dino since I still use grub-1 but I prefer recent kernels (currently
> 4.70-rc4)
>
> I don't understand the 'root=' option on the boot line like
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-4.7.0-rc4 root=/dev/sda1
>
> Here my bad
On 06/25/2016 09:39:32 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 20:33:31 +0200, Helmut Jarausch
(jarau...@skynet.be) wrote about "[gentoo-user] booting - I don't
anystand how the (Linux) world works anymore" (in
):
[snip]
> So, I came up with
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> [1] It's also one of the reasons persistent device naming came into
> udev, to try guarantee the same device will always have the same name
>
This is also one of the reasons why an initramfs is useful.
Linus
Many, many thanks!
That works indeed.
Helmut
On 06/25/2016 09:19:47 PM, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 08:33:31PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> So, I came up withroot=UUID=uuid_number of the root file system.
>
> But to my surprise I now got a kernel panic
> syncing:
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
>
> anything intelligent if I tried. Back in the golden age, for about ten
> years even! my approach to updating my system worked great. Then emerge
> got ornery and stopped letting the necessary, cathartic, inevitable,
>
On 25/06/2016 20:33, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a dino since I still use grub-1 but I prefer recent kernels
> (currently 4.70-rc4)
>
> I don't understand the 'root=' option on the boot line like
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-4.7.0-rc4 root=/dev/sda1
>
> Here my bad experience:
>
> Having
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> I don't understand the 'root=' option on the boot line like
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-4.7.0-rc4 root=/dev/sda1
>
It is pretty simple. If you're not using an initramfs, the kernel
attempts to find the device you list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 20:33:31 +0200, Helmut Jarausch
(jarau...@skynet.be) wrote about "[gentoo-user] booting - I don't
anystand how the (Linux) world works anymore" (in
):
[snip]
> So, I came up with
Helmut Jarausch skynet.be> writes:
> But to my surprise I now got a kernel panic
> syncing: VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown block(0,0)
> So, please tell me what I'm missing?
I do not know. The kernel development is moving at light speed. I too
have lost track of many details. Here is
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 08:33:31PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> So, I came up withroot=UUID=uuid_number of the root file system.
>
> But to my surprise I now got a kernel panic
> syncing: VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown block(0,0)
>
> So, please tell me what I'm missing?
»Q« wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:20:25 -0500
> Dale wrote:
>
>> »Q« wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500
>>> Dale wrote:
>>>
I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up
correctly. Why make someone else use trial
Hi,
I'm a dino since I still use grub-1 but I prefer recent kernels
(currently 4.70-rc4)
I don't understand the 'root=' option on the boot line like
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-4.7.0-rc4 root=/dev/sda1
Here my bad experience:
Having booted by SystemRescueCD from the cdrom device, my root
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:20:25 -0500
Dale wrote:
> »Q« wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500
> > Dale wrote:
> >
> >> I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up
> >> correctly. Why make someone else use trial and error like I
»Q« wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500
> Dale wrote:
>
>> I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up
>> correctly. Why make someone else use trial and error like I did when
>> all I had to do was post
> Refraining from posting would *not* have
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:18:00 -0500
Dale wrote:
> I started out on this thread helping the OP get his set up
> correctly. Why make someone else use trial and error like I did when
> all I had to do was post
Refraining from posting would *not* have forced the OP to use
»Q« wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>>
I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was
even more confused. After the third time, I didn't see
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>>> The point of the news item is not to make it work now, it already
>>> does. The advice is there to help you get your system into a state
>>> where it won't stop working when the next stage of the switch occurs.
>> I get
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500
Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >
> >> I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was
> >> even more confused. After the third time, I didn't see any point
> >>
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > The point of the news item is not to make it work now, it already
> > does. The advice is there to help you get your system into a state
> > where it won't stop working when the next stage of the switch occurs.
> I get that but that didn't make
On Saturday 25 Jun 2016 10:31:22 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Hello, Let me introduce myself again.
>
> I'm 38.
No, your chronological age may be 38, but your emotional age is stuck at early
teens.
> I have no job,
>
> I have not had a job in 4 years.
If you recent behaviour on this M/L is
Mick wrote:
> On Friday 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2016 17:40, Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote:
>> I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to
>> wasn't
>> much
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was even
>> more confused. After the third time, I didn't see any point in reading
>> it again so I went to the link, hoping it would be better. Well, not
>>
Hello, Let me introduce myself again.
I'm 38.
I have no job,
I have not had a job in 4 years.
I can't get a job because I have not had job in 4 years.
Literally, nobody will hire me.
My computer is six years old. All I want it to do is just keep working
the way it did last week.
My health
Hi,
recently an update to kaffeine via emerge was installed on my Gentoo
PC. Since I am using no other DVBT-viewer I was happy for the update.
But I was wrong.
All channel settings were deleted and I had to rescan again -
including removing unwanted ones...
Then at least one channel is missing.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was even
> more confused. After the third time, I didn't see any point in reading
> it again so I went to the link, hoping it would be better. Well, not
> really. So, I just started
On Friday 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 24/06/2016 17:40, Dale wrote:
> >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >>> On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote:
> I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to
> wasn't
> much better either. In
32 matches
Mail list logo