Re: [gentoo-user] Use brctl from bridge-utils or bridge from iproute2?

On 161016-23:23+0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 16 October 2016 at 23:19, Miroslav Rovis ... > >> > >> [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Netifrc/Brctl_Migration > >> ... > > /usr/share/doc/netifrc-0.4.0/net.example.bz2 > > > > of netifrc package has been updated, ot will soon be updated as well, > >

[gentoo-user] Solved: KDE 5: Broken file protocol for KDE 4 apps caused by kwallet

> Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> after the update to Plasma 5/KF5, I can no longer open (HTML) files from >> my local disk with Konqueror. It claims it does no longer know the file >> protocol. I get a similar error in Amarok when I try to apply a cover to >> an album from the local disk.

Re: [gentoo-user] Use brctl from bridge-utils or bridge from iproute2?

On 16 October 2016 at 23:19, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 161016-09:33+0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> On 16 October 2016 at 08:10, Miroslav Rovis >> wrote: >> > On 161016-03:05+, Erik Mackdanz wrote: >> >> Miroslav Rovis

Re: [gentoo-user] Use brctl from bridge-utils or bridge from iproute2?

On 161016-09:33+0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 16 October 2016 at 08:10, Miroslav Rovis > wrote: > > On 161016-03:05+, Erik Mackdanz wrote: > >> Miroslav Rovis writes: > > ... > >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] Flash-Plugin not found by Chromium after update

On Sunday 16 Oct 2016 17:58:06 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Stephan Lukasczyk > > wrote: > > On 2016-10-16 15:14:07, Mick wrote: > >> On Sunday 16 Oct 2016 15:49:51 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >>> I've got flash working with these pkgs: >

[gentoo-user] Re: GTK+ circular dependency

On 10/12/2016 05:50 PM, Daniel Quinn wrote: > Have any of you seen this before? This is on a fresh install. I can't > get anything GNOME-based to install as it looks like gnome-keyring is > bringing in an older version of gtk+ which somehow depends on > gtk-engines-adwaita which in turn depends

Re: [gentoo-user] Flash-Plugin not found by Chromium after update

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Stephan Lukasczyk wrote: > On 2016-10-16 15:14:07, Mick wrote: >> >> On Sunday 16 Oct 2016 15:49:51 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >>> >>> I've got flash working with these pkgs: >>> www-plugins/adobe-flash-23.0.0.185 >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Flash-Plugin not found by Chromium after update

On 2016-10-16 15:14:07, Mick wrote: On Sunday 16 Oct 2016 15:49:51 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I've got flash working with these pkgs: www-plugins/adobe-flash-23.0.0.185 www-client/chromium-54.0.2840.59 With no www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins installed. I have both

Re: [gentoo-user] Flash-Plugin not found by Chromium after update

On Sunday 16 Oct 2016 15:49:51 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Stephan Lukasczyk > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I yesterday updated Chromium to 54.0.2840.59 (stable) in my desktop > > machine and since then it is not able to find the Flash

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

>Hi, > >this evening I updated GENTOO and a new firefox was installed. >This one seem completly to disable flash video finally... >since I got no video/audio at all. > >I disabled all flash-related addons of my firefox and >restarted it. > >Now I got a video ... but without any audio. >(I am

Re: [gentoo-user] Flash-Plugin not found by Chromium after update

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Stephan Lukasczyk wrote: > Hi all, > > I yesterday updated Chromium to 54.0.2840.59 (stable) in my desktop > machine and since then it is not able to find the Flash plugin. The day > before, I've updated

[gentoo-user] Flash-Plugin not found by Chromium after update

Hi all, I yesterday updated Chromium to 54.0.2840.59 (stable) in my desktop machine and since then it is not able to find the Flash plugin. The day before, I've updated `www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins` to 54.0.2840.59 (stable). Everything went as usual--no warnings, no errors... After

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku [16-10-16 09:12]: > With Pulseaudio the best way (I have found) for controling the volume, is > through the pulse audio volume controls. > > It works well for me. Though they are somewhat of a pain (though not sure if > that's because I

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku [16-10-16 09:12]: > With Pulseaudio the best way (I have found) for controling the volume, is > through the pulse audio volume controls. > > It works well for me. Though they are somewhat of a pain (though not sure if > that's because I

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

With Pulseaudio the best way (I have found) for controling the volume, is through the pulse audio volume controls. It works well for me. Though they are somewhat of a pain (though not sure if that's because I simply don't know the "easier" way to handle them. I also tend to like to handle

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

Miroslav Rovis [16-10-16 07:00]: > On 161015-20:27+0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this evening I updated GENTOO and a new firefox was installed. > > This one seem completly to disable flash video finally... > > since I got no video/audio at all. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Use brctl from bridge-utils or bridge from iproute2?

On 16 October 2016 at 08:10, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 161016-03:05+, Erik Mackdanz wrote: >> Miroslav Rovis writes: > ... >> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Iproute2#iproute2_for_net-tools_swappers >> > >> > -- also notice that