Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

170423 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 07:45:49 CEST schrieb Philip Webb: >> What are other users' experiences using GCC 5.4.0 ? > My personal advice & experience: > * install the new gcc-5.4 > * switch to it > * run the revdep-rebuild command from the news item (see above)

[gentoo-user] How to get rid of sys-fs/static-dev, or do I really need it?

Hi folks, tried to do an "emerge -eav world" but it didn't even start, because of: INFO: pretend Package:sys-fs/static-dev-0.1 Repository: gentoo Maintainer: base-sys...@gentoo.org USE:abi_x86_64 amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux userland_GNU FEATURES: ccache preserve-libs sandbox

Re: [gentoo-user] encrypting file for Windows users

On 04/23/2017 05:13 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:42 PM, wrote: >> I'm looking for a solution to encrypt and attachment to Windows users. >> gpg does not support "sda" Self Decrypting Archives. >> >> Occasionally I have to send an attachment via email and

Re: [gentoo-user] encrypting file for Windows users

On 04/23/2017 05:12 PM, Mick wrote: > On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 16:42:12 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I'm looking for a solution to encrypt and attachment to Windows users. >> gpg does not support "sda" Self Decrypting Archives. >> >> Occasionally I have to send an attachment via email and would

Re: [gentoo-user] encrypting file for Windows users

On 04/23/2017 04:13 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:42 PM, wrote: >> I'm looking for a solution to encrypt and attachment to Windows users. >> gpg does not support "sda" Self Decrypting Archives. >> >> Occasionally I have to send an attachment via email and

Re: [gentoo-user] encrypting file for Windows users

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:42 PM, wrote: > I'm looking for a solution to encrypt and attachment to Windows users. > gpg does not support "sda" Self Decrypting Archives. > > Occasionally I have to send an attachment via email and would prefer if > the file was encrypted.

Re: [gentoo-user] encrypting file for Windows users

On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 16:42:12 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I'm looking for a solution to encrypt and attachment to Windows users. > gpg does not support "sda" Self Decrypting Archives. > > Occasionally I have to send an attachment via email and would prefer if > the file was encrypted.

[gentoo-user] encrypting file for Windows users

I'm looking for a solution to encrypt and attachment to Windows users. gpg does not support "sda" Self Decrypting Archives. Occasionally I have to send an attachment via email and would prefer if the file was encrypted. Asking Windows users to use PGP is almost impossible. Sending them txt.exe

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 18:59:16 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: > > > What are other users' experiences using GCC 5.4.0 ? > > My personal advice & experience: > * install the new gcc-5.4 > * switch to it > * run the revdep-rebuild command from the news item (see above) > ... and everything

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 07:45:49 CEST schrieb Philip Webb: > I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. > There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI > & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. > > The first pkg I

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Sonntag, 23. April 2017 07:45:49 CEST Philip Webb wrote: > I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. > There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI > & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. While it does read like

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to set size to windows in Openbox in local config [SOLVED]

Hi Floyd! This is just an interim notice-reply. I need a few days to find a couple of hours time to study the links you gave. I only wish to express my appreciation, as the links look interesting and to the point, as well as the rest of your reply. On 170422-04:35+0200, Floyd Anderson wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-user] crypto with dolphin:5

On April 23, 2017 10:04:50 AM GMT+02:00, Marc Joliet wrote: >On Sonntag, 23. April 2017 07:56:05 CEST J. Roeleveld wrote: >> Ok. /etc/portage/package.use.unmask doesn't work. > >First, there is no package.use.unmask (although I'll grant that that >would be >the intuitive name for

Re: [gentoo-user] crypto with dolphin:5

On Sonntag, 23. April 2017 07:56:05 CEST J. Roeleveld wrote: > Ok. /etc/portage/package.use.unmask doesn't work. First, there is no package.use.unmask (although I'll grant that that would be the intuitive name for such a file). There is only package.use.mask and package.use.stable.mask, which

Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake?

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Adam Carter wrote: >> Thanks. I suppose it's just a gcc thing, then. I just emerged >> gcc-5.4.0 and the output is the same, though. > > > My skylake comes up as broadwell too, with gcc 5.4 > > Looks like gcc 6 has a skylake arch, but not a

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

> I went back to GCC 4.9.3 & the pkg merged without any problem. > > What are other users' experiences using GCC 5.4.0 ? > ~amd64 users have been using it for ages, with no problems. I have one system that seems to need me to run ldconfig when i update gcc, but the others are fine.

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On 04/22/2017 10:45 PM, Philip Webb wrote: > I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. > There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI > & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. > > The first pkg I tried to compile with