Re: [gentoo-user] How to get rid of sys-fs/static-dev, or do I really need it?

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:29:36 +0200, wabe wrote: > > > I'm using sys-fs/eudev and no static /dev. So I tried to deplcean > > sys-fs/static-dev but this failed because of: > > > > !!! 'sys-fs/static-dev' (virtual/dev-manager) is part of your system > >

Re: [gentoo-user] New AMD hardware. Can't boot.

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 19:56:22 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Peter. > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:56:32 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > [ ] > > > I also have an Asus motherboard, but for Intel hardware. > > > > In your BIOS secure-boot page, do you have a section called Key > >

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Yes, I had too, once. At that time though quite a few packages could > only be emerged with -j1, so I had to make exceptions for them. It was > easier just to put the options into an alias: > > $ alias emerj='sudo emerge --jobs=24

[gentoo-user] Re: GCC 5.4.0

On 2017-04-24, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 16:45:58 I wrote: >> On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: >> >> > I've had the odd rebuild failure here & there, don't bother re-emerging >> > it until revdep-rebuild has finished. Any dependencies it needs

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 16:45:58 I wrote: > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: > > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six > > > hours on two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] New AMD hardware. Can't boot.

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 19:56:22 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > I think I'll look at bootctl. It's looks far more likely to give me > what I want than grub2. Does it cope OK with mdadm RAID setups? I don't see why not. Detecting and setting up RAID comes after choosing the system to be booted. --

Re: [gentoo-user] New AMD hardware. Can't boot.

Hello, Peter. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:56:32 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: [ ] > I also have an Asus motherboard, but for Intel hardware. > In your BIOS secure-boot page, do you have a section called Key Management? > When I was working on getting my machine to boot, a year ago, I was

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On April 24, 2017 5:45:58 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey wrote: >On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: >> On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: >> > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six >> > hours on two systems

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six > > hours on two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower > > machine) and still hasn't finished. And qtwebkit

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six > > hours on two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower > > machine) and still hasn't finished. And qtwebkit

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six hours on > two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower machine) and > still hasn't finished. And qtwebkit has just failed; I'd better look into > that. I've

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 11:11:09 Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 10:13:29 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey: > > On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 15:26:48 Marc Joliet wrote: > > > I followed the instructions and everything went fine, albeit it took > > > about 2 days on my desktop just for the

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 10:13:29 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey: > On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 15:26:48 Marc Joliet wrote: > > I followed the instructions and everything went fine, albeit it took about > > 2 days on my desktop just for the revdep-rebuild. > > I couldn't face the prospect of

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 15:26:48 Marc Joliet wrote: > I followed the instructions and everything went fine, albeit it took about > 2 days on my desktop just for the revdep-rebuild. I couldn't face the prospect of line-by-line emerging of 341 packages taking hours or days, so I added "--jobs=X

Re: [gentoo-user] How to get rid of sys-fs/static-dev, or do I really need it?

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:29:36 +0200, wabe wrote: > I'm using sys-fs/eudev and no static /dev. So I tried to deplcean > sys-fs/static-dev but this failed because of: > > !!! 'sys-fs/static-dev' (virtual/dev-manager) is part of your system > profile. !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your