[gentoo-user] Re: Changing dependencies without upping version ??

On 2017-09-25 22:24, Michael Palimaka wrote: > I see a few complaints in this thread, but nobody so far has > elaborated on the problem they have with this change. The problem is that if I want to complete the upgrade the way portage suggests, I have to (newly) allow in and time-consumingly

Re: [gentoo-user] distributed emerge

2017-09-25 6:35 GMT-05:00 Damo Brisbane : > hi, > > Can someone point where I might go for parallel @world build, it is really > for my own curiositynat this time. Currently I stage binaries for multiple > machines on a single nfs share, but the assumption is to use instead

[gentoo-user] Re: Changing dependencies without upping version ??

On 09/25/2017 03:37 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. I see a few complaints in this thread, but nobody so far has elaborated on the problem they have with this change.

[gentoo-user] distributed emerge

hi, Can someone point where I might go for parallel @world build, it is really for my own curiositynat this time. Currently I stage binaries for multiple machines on a single nfs share, but the assumption is to use instead some distributed filesystem. So I think I just need a recipie, pointers or

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing dependencies without upping version ??

Am Montag, 25. September 2017, 02:33:13 CEST schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:51 PM, John Blinka wrote: > >> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. > > > > I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a > > --changed-deps

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing dependencies without upping version ??

On Monday, 25 September 2017 4:51:22 AM AEST John Blinka wrote: > > Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. > > I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a > --changed-deps flag to emerge? Does seem dirty. Glad you asked the > question. Would love to learn