hehehehe :-)
every now and again I unleash my inner grumpy old fart and should him to
the world at large!
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:05:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you should lay out clearly why you think
On Mon, Feb 19 2018, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:05:37 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> It is a good point. Why Gentoo developers marked or allow to mark
>> gnucash-2.7 branch stable in portage when the developers
>> https://www.gnucash.org/download.phtml did not mark
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:05:37 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> It is a good point. Why Gentoo developers marked or allow to mark
> gnucash-2.7 branch stable in portage when the developers
> https://www.gnucash.org/download.phtml did not mark it STABLE
The key phrase there is "stable in
On 02/18/2018 05:50 PM, John Blinka wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:40 AM allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 18 2018, Mick wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:09:36 GMT allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>> Specifically excluding the buggy (old) version of
On Sunday, 18 February 2018 02:14:18 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I no longer use Gnucash, having switched to KMyMoney a few years ago. Now
> that's just jumped a major version and I had to mask it because of
> missing features... so much for progress.
This conversation reminds me that I used to
Stroller:
> > On 18 Feb 2018, at 17:47, Floyd Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> $ cat t.sh
> >> #!/bin/bash
> >> TMPF=$(mktemp "/tmp/detox_wrapper.$$.")
> >> for f in "$@"; do
> >> touch -r "$f" "$TMPF"
> >> detox "$f"
> >> touch -r "$TMPF" "$f"
> >> done
> >> rm -f "$TMPF"
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:05:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Perhaps you should lay out clearly why you think you need to do this,
> so everyone else can help match your expectations to reality :-)
Watch out everyone, Alan's in one of those moods! ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
C: (n.) the language
On 19/02/2018 14:55, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
Hey,
I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to figure
out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not *dependencies*,
dependants: packages that require said package.
As a recent example: whenever go (the language)
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:55:08 + (UTC)
Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to
> figure out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not
> *dependencies*, dependants: packages that require
Hey,
I'm not exactly new to portage, but one thing that I cannot seem to figure
out is how to rebuild all dependants of a package. Not *dependencies*,
dependants: packages that require said package.
As a recent example: whenever go (the language) is updated to a new version
(say from 1.9 to
> On 18 Feb 2018, at 11:38, Stroller wrote:
>>
>> With the tool 'detox' those filenames could be fixed.
>>
>> But detox changes the time stamp of the files, which
>> filenames are altered (not all files, which are examined).
>>
>> Is there a way to either get
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:10:03 +0200, zless wrote:
> On top of that my nvme disk is not seen in the busybox recovery shell
> in order to try to manually mount the encrypted container.
> I think the nvme things are modules inside the initrd and
> that doesn't get loaded.
If you're in busybox the
> On 18 Feb 2018, at 17:47, Floyd Anderson wrote:
>>
>> $ cat t.sh
>> #!/bin/bash
>> TMPF=$(mktemp "/tmp/detox_wrapper.$$.")
>> for f in "$@"; do
>> touch -r "$f" "$TMPF"
>> detox "$f"
>> touch -r "$TMPF" "$f"
>> done
>> rm -f "$TMPF"
>
> If I’m not totally wrong,
13 matches
Mail list logo