On 2018-04-22 20:28, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> 1. is net-im/psi-1.3-r1
> 2. is app-admin/pass-1.7.1
>
> both packages install their bin into /root/bin. All other packages are
> installing correct, just that two packages did it wrong.
FWIW I also have pass installed (same version) and it is in the
On 2018-04-22 15:08, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> > * make sure dev-lang/python:3.6 stays in the world file, even if it
> > is not needed by me directly
>
> No, you shouldn't need any dev-lang/python entries in the world
> file. I don't have any in my world file, but still have 2.7 and 3.5
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Folks,
forgive me to have the second question in several days. I just start to
get used to Gentoo. :-)
Currently I have two packages that installed somehow wrong.
1. is net-im/psi-1.3-r1
2. is app-admin/pass-1.7.1
both packages install their
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:34:36AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> ...
>
> This is disappointing. It looks like I have to do 2 things manually:
Nope, just one.
> * set PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_6" - where? In make.conf? Will
> it override the profile setting?
Yes, right in
I am still on the 2013 profile, and I therefore have
PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 python3_5.
The other day I had to install python 3.6 for reasons unrelated to
portage or other packages. I thought I would reduce my overall snake
footprint by removing 3.5 _if_ it wasn't really necessary anymore. To
On Sunday, 22 April 2018 10:21:16 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> That first thought was prompted by the instruction to "mount -o bind /lib/
> modules /foo/lib/modules" in this page:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:X86/Chroot_Guide
I didn't do a detailed comparison, but you may want to take
On Sunday, 22 April 2018 10:21:16 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 April 2018 09:39:23 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Sunday, 22 April 2018 07:20:28 BST Jonathan Callen wrote:
> > > Generally, this would indicate a problem resolving DNS. This is
> > > normally caused by not having a
On Sunday, 22 April 2018 09:39:23 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 April 2018 07:20:28 BST Jonathan Callen wrote:
> > Generally, this would indicate a problem resolving DNS. This is
> > normally caused by not having a correct /etc/resolv.conf inside the
> > chroot (it generally will need
On Sunday, 22 April 2018 07:20:28 BST Jonathan Callen wrote:
> Generally, this would indicate a problem resolving DNS. This is
> normally caused by not having a correct /etc/resolv.conf inside the
> chroot (it generally will need to be the same as the file outside the
> chroot).
Yes, I'd
On 04/22/2018 01:13 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I've been NFS-exporting the portage treee from a 32-bit atom box to a chroot
> on my workstation, and it's worked well for years, if slowly.
>
> Now when I try to do the same with a 64-bit celeron machine I'm having a
> problem getting portage to
10 matches
Mail list logo
