Re: [gentoo-user] flag icu

2018-08-15 Thread james
On 08/13/18 13:14, Corentin �Nado� Pazdera wrote: > August 13, 2018 6:58 PM, "james" wrote: > >> Here's what I got running your script:: >> >> /etc # /root/profile-explorer.sh >> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.use/explored-packages: >> /usr/portage/profiles/base/packages >> ---

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread tuxic
On 08/15 08:13, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 15/08/18 18:45, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > I put nvidia-uvm explictly into /etc/conf.d/modules - which was not > > necessary ever beforeand it shows the same problems: No cuda > > devices. > > > > I think I will dream this night of no cuda

[gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 15/08/18 18:45, tu...@posteo.de wrote: I put nvidia-uvm explictly into /etc/conf.d/modules - which was not necessary ever beforeand it shows the same problems: No cuda devices. I think I will dream this night of no cuda devices... ;( Or you might want to use the LTS (Long Term

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
August 15, 2018 5:45 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > I put nvidia-uvm explictly into /etc/conf.d/modules - which was not > necessary ever beforeand it shows the same problems: No cuda > devices. > > I think I will dream this night of no cuda devices... ;( > > On 08/15 05:11, tu...@posteo.de

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread tuxic
I put nvidia-uvm explictly into /etc/conf.d/modules - which was not necessary ever beforeand it shows the same problems: No cuda devices. I think I will dream this night of no cuda devices... ;( On 08/15 05:11, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 08/15 02:32, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug?

2018-08-15 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday, 15 August 2018 12:45:05 BST Franz Fellner wrote: > I think that's the way "equery w" works: > >> Display the path to the ebuild that would be used by Portage with the > > current configuration. << > With your current configuration there is no package matching your query. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread tuxic
On 08/15 02:32, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > August 15, 2018 2:59 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > Yes I did reboot the sustem. In my initial mail I mentioned a tool > > called CUDA-Z and Blender, which both reports a missing CUDA device. > > Ok, so you do not have a specific error which

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
August 15, 2018 2:59 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Yes I did reboot the sustem. In my initial mail I mentioned a tool > called CUDA-Z and Blender, which both reports a missing CUDA device. Ok, so you do not have a specific error which might have been thrown by the module? Other ideas, check

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread tuxic
On 08/15 12:45, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > August 15, 2018 2:02 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > ...sorry, I am no native speaker...I dont understand. > > > > I did not know how to disable CUDA on both cards. > > So...since it works perfectly with the old driver I would think: > > No, CUDA is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread tuxic
On 08/15 03:35, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 15/08/18 15:02, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Then I do an "emerge " and CUDA stops > > working. I do not change anything else nor do I know, who/what could > > disable CUDA on both cards ... except for the driver itsself. > > Dumb question, but just to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
August 15, 2018 2:02 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > ...sorry, I am no native speaker...I dont understand. > > I did not know how to disable CUDA on both cards. > So...since it works perfectly with the old driver I would think: > No, CUDA is enabled (or at least the old driver does this for me). >

[gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 15/08/18 15:02, tu...@posteo.de wrote: Then I do an "emerge " and CUDA stops working. I do not change anything else nor do I know, who/what could disable CUDA on both cards ... except for the driver itsself. Dumb question, but just to be sure: did you reboot after upgrading the driver? The

[gentoo-user] Re: Is this a portage bug?

2018-08-15 Thread nunojsilva
On 2018-08-15, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > While trying to get a USB printer recognised on an Atom box, I found this, > immediately after emerge --sync && eix-update: > > (atom) peak / # eix -c kyocera > [N] net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver (--): Printer descriptions (PPDs) and >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread tuxic
On 08/15 11:39, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > August 15, 2018 1:16 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > The wiki-page is old...it speaks of nvidia-driver-174. > > Yeah, for legacy cards... If you check the history its also been updated > quite frequently. > > > modprobe.d/nvidia.conf: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug?

2018-08-15 Thread Franz Fellner
I think that's the way "equery w" works: >> Display the path to the ebuild that would be used by Portage with the current configuration. << With your current configuration there is no package matching your query. Alternatives for future use in such cases: ❯ epkginfo -k kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver *

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
August 15, 2018 1:16 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > The wiki-page is old...it speaks of nvidia-driver-174. Yeah, for legacy cards... If you check the history its also been updated quite frequently. > modprobe.d/nvidia.conf: > > # Nvidia drivers support > alias

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread tuxic
On 08/15 10:33, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > August 15, 2018 4:19 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 08/14 11:16, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > >> On 14/08/18 13:35, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> after upgrading to nvidia-drivers-396.51 no CUDA devices were found. > >> Last

Re: [gentoo-user] sanoid (was Backup questions)

2018-08-15 Thread John Covici
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 02:45:20 -0400, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 10:52:30 PM CEST John Covici wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 16:06:21 -0400, > > > > J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > On August 14, 2018 11:42:18 AM UTC, John Covici > wrote: > > > >I use sanoid/syncoid to back up

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
August 15, 2018 4:19 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 08/14 11:16, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 14/08/18 13:35, tu...@posteo.de wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after upgrading to nvidia-drivers-396.51 no CUDA devices were found. >> Last version, which works for me is nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1. >> >> Do

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug?

2018-08-15 Thread Arve Barsnes
On 15 August 2018 at 11:22, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday, 15 August 2018 09:50:09 BST Franz Fellner wrote: > (atom) peak / # equery w net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver > > Something does seem to be, if not broken, somewhat bent. That seems to be correct. equery w takes your configuration

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug?

2018-08-15 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday, 15 August 2018 09:50:09 BST Franz Fellner wrote: > > Am Mi., 15. Aug. 2018 um 11:29 Uhr schrieb Peter Humphrey < > > pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>: > > Hello list, > > > > While trying to get a USB printer recognised on an Atom box, I found > > this, immediately after emerge --sync &&

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups without X

2018-08-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:53:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > ISTR something about not setting USB_PRINTER in the kernel config, but > > it's been a while since I used a USB printer. When I did, it was on a > > headless box. > > Yes, I knew about the kernel printer support being obsolete, and

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug?

2018-08-15 Thread Franz Fellner
It's ~amd64 only. So if you get missing keyword, could it be you are on x86? Am Mi., 15. Aug. 2018 um 11:29 Uhr schrieb Peter Humphrey < pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>: > Hello list, > > While trying to get a USB printer recognised on an Atom box, I found this, > immediately after emerge --sync &&

[gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug?

2018-08-15 Thread Peter Humphrey
Hello list, While trying to get a USB printer recognised on an Atom box, I found this, immediately after emerge --sync && eix-update: (atom) peak / # eix -c kyocera [N] net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver (--): Printer descriptions (PPDs) and filters for Kyocera 1x2x MFP [N]

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups without X

2018-08-15 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 17:32:47 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:24:48 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > My problem is that, even though the system detects the printer being > > connected, cups can't see it. I've tried everything I can think of so > > I'm now hoping that

Re: [gentoo-user] sanoid (was Backup questions)

2018-08-15 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 10:52:30 PM CEST John Covici wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 16:06:21 -0400, > > J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On August 14, 2018 11:42:18 AM UTC, John Covici wrote: > > >I use sanoid/syncoid to back up using zfs. Its great, keeps snapshots > > >for as long as I want them (I