Thank you for the response, though I feel you don't address my
question. Happily though, I spoke with an acquaintance and it was
determined that the subservience to the license (i.e. agreeing to be
bound by the GPL2) could not be offered as consideration as its
restrictions were not the licensee's
I was addressing OpenBSD as-well, I chose the lists to CC to: linux
lists and BSD, since the underlying concerns are the same.
It took slightly longer to find the appropriate openbsd list, infact, so
you definitely weren't CC'd by accident.
On 2018-12-27 22:54, leo_...@volny.cz wrote:
zeur
Your initial argument, as I imagine you ment to communicate (a single
negation, rather than the double negation you proffered) hits a snag:
I am a licensed attorney.
"You ain't no lawyer, buddy"
Your double negatives speak the truth: I am a licensed attorney.
"you're a clueless halfwit"
Real name pls, if want to be taken somewhat serious? Thank you.
So where my logic cannot be attacked, my person may be instead?
Do you think me a fool, simply because you do not know what you do not
know (the law), yet think you do (an attribute of many programmers: know
one field, know them
4 matches
Mail list logo
