On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 17:36:04 BST Mike Gilbert wrote:
> The above log snippet is fairly useless. In the future, please make
> sure to include the relevant log snippet, or attach/pastebin the
> entire build log if in doubt.
I had all the logs etc ready to send; I wanted first to see if it was
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:14 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
> Is anyone else having trouble emerging systemd-boot-241? This machine has a
> small rescue system as an alternative boot, and I get a mysterious error when
> I emerge the package. The end of the log shows this:
>
> [248/248]
On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 14:34:19 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 11:11:42 AM CEST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 06:56:02 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > if you search for "stat" in the build-log and/or makefile(s), does it
> > > show
> > > which file(s) it
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 11:11:42 AM CEST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 06:56:02 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > if you search for "stat" in the build-log and/or makefile(s), does it show
> > which file(s) it is checking?
>
> Looking into the work directory I find this little
On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 06:56:02 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> if you search for "stat" in the build-log and/or makefile(s), does it show
> which file(s) it is checking?
Looking into the work directory I find this little surprise:
# ls -l
On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 06:56:02 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> if you search for "stat" in the build-log and/or makefile(s), does it show
> which file(s) it is checking?
The log has four occurrences of "stat". The first is during the initial
checks: Program stat found: YES (/usr/bin/stat)
Line
6 matches
Mail list logo
