On Monday, 14 October 2019 20:52:41 BST Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Hartmut Figge:
> >Current status: Emerging (181 of 262) :)
>
> Current status unknown because of
> ERROR: dev-cpp/cairomm-1.12.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> emake failed
>
> Interesting that a test with 'emerge -q cairomm'
Hartmut Figge:
>Current status: Emerging (181 of 262) :)
Current status unknown because of
ERROR: dev-cpp/cairomm-1.12.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
emake failed
Interesting that a test with 'emerge -q cairomm' failed whereas 'emerge
-q -uDN cairomm' succeeded.
After over 200 packages
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:12:22 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I ran into this for the first time last week, and I tinkered for an
> > embarassingly long time before it dawned on me that simply emerging
> > portage and gentoolkit together was the answer. It does seem like a
> > bit of a bug when
William Hubbs:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 07:24:00PM +0200, Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> Phew. 262 packages will be emerged. Well, that will take some time.
>
>Ouch, it sounds like you haven't updated in a while.
Mhm, ca. 2 times in a month. Using -q -uDN @world. Earlier today i have
noticed one
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 07:24:00PM +0200, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> William Hubbs:
>
> >I ran the following command as root to fix this:
> >
> >emerge --changed-deps y -NDuqa @world
> >
> >Once you run this,
>
> Phew. 262 packages will be emerged. Well, that will take some time.
Ouch, it sounds
William Hubbs:
>I ran the following command as root to fix this:
>
>emerge --changed-deps y -NDuqa @world
>
>Once you run this,
Phew. 262 packages will be emerged. Well, that will take some time.
>virtual/pam will be removed from your system the next
>time you run "emerge --depclean".
Hartmut
On Monday, 14 October 2019 16:56:48 BST Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2019, 17:33:41 CEST schrieb Hartmut Figge:
> > Grant Edwards:
> > >This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
> > >scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
> >
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:26:32PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
> scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
> sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles.
>
> What am I missing?
I ran the
Accoring to revdep-rebuild(1)
CONFIGURATION
revdep-rebuild no longer uses hardcoded paths. To change the
default behavior the following variables can be changed by the
user.
LD_LIBRARY_MASK - Mask of specially evaluated libraries
SEARCH_DIRS - List of
On 2019-10-14, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday, 14 October 2019 15:47:53 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2019-10-12, Daniel Frey wrote:
>> > I've run into this many times, whenever portage asks me to update itself
>> > after a sync I always run `emerge -a portage gentoolkit` to merge them
>> >
On Monday, 14 October 2019 15:47:53 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-10-12, Daniel Frey wrote:
> > I've run into this many times, whenever portage asks me to update itself
> > after a sync I always run `emerge -a portage gentoolkit` to merge them
> > both so this error doesn't happen.
>
> I
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2019, 17:33:41 CEST schrieb Hartmut Figge:
> Grant Edwards:
> >This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
> >scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
> >sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles.
>
> I was just
On 10/14/19 7:47 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-10-12, Daniel Frey wrote:
I've run into this many times, whenever portage asks me to update itself
after a sync I always run `emerge -a portage gentoolkit` to merge them
both so this error doesn't happen.
I ran into this for the first time
On 2019-10-14, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Grant Edwards:
>
>>This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
>>scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
>>sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles.
>
> I was just bitten by that.
>
>>What am I
Grant Edwards:
>This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
>scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
>sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles.
I was just bitten by that.
>What am I missing?
Time for waiting?
Hartmut, gets coat
This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles.
What am I missing?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! HELLO, everybody,
On 2019-10-12, Daniel Frey wrote:
> I've run into this many times, whenever portage asks me to update itself
> after a sync I always run `emerge -a portage gentoolkit` to merge them
> both so this error doesn't happen.
I ran into this for the first time last week, and I tinkered for an
On 2019-10-12, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I'm still as much as 3 months away from having spare CPU time, right now
> the next update is looking **BAD**:
If you aren't going to update for 6 months at a time, then Gentoo is
not a wise choice for a distribution. You've been told this many
times.
On Monday, 14 October 2019 14:25:33 BST Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Paul Colquhoun:
> >I used to use qpopper until 2 or 3 years ago.
> >
> >Now i use net-mail/tpop3d
>
> I dared to remove qpopper and instal tpop3d.
>
> >It's entice config file is:
> >
> ># cat /etc/tpop3d/tpop3d.conf
>
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:03:53 -0400,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:21:52 -0400, John Covici wrote:
>
> > Thanks, I do need the current sources, lots of packages want to check
> > them and the linux directory entry points to the sources, packages are
> > always looking in
Paul Colquhoun:
>I used to use qpopper until 2 or 3 years ago.
>
>Now i use net-mail/tpop3d
I dared to remove qpopper and instal tpop3d.
>It's entice config file is:
>
># cat /etc/tpop3d/tpop3d.conf
>listen-address: 127.0.0.1
>mailbox: bsd:/var/spool/mail/$(user)
>auth-pam-enable: true
On Monday, 14 October 2019 08:21:52 BST John Covici wrote:
> Thanks, I do need the current sources, lots of packages want to check
> them and the linux directory entry points to the sources, packages are
> always looking in there when I emerge them.
But they're looking for configuration values,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:21:52 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> Thanks, I do need the current sources, lots of packages want to check
> them and the linux directory entry points to the sources, packages are
> always looking in there when I emerge them.
Put this in /etc/portage/sets.conf
[kernels]
Paul Colquhoun:
>On Monday, October 14, 2019 5:46:46 P.M. AEDT Hartmut Figge wrote:
>I used to use qpopper until 2 or 3 years ago.
>
>Now i use net-mail/tpop3d
I had not considered this one because no stable version is available and
my Gentoo is mostly stable.
>It's entice config file is:
>
>#
On Monday, October 14, 2019 5:46:46 P.M. AEDT Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> first some history. qpopper was masked a long time ago now but is still
> installed and working on my Gentoo. Even if it doesn't show up anymore
> on eix. But it does on eix-test-obsolete.
>
> I don't like this
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 01:06:54 -0400,
Arve Barsnes wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 05:04, John Covici wrote:
> >
> > Hi. After a long time, I got my system into a state where I could
> > finally try to do emerge depclean. What a mess! It would have
> > deleted source for my running kernel,
Since Augusts dhcpcd update to net-misc/dhcpcd-7.2.3 dhcpcd has often
missed actually updating the interface when a change happens. Even
issuing a manual dhcpcd -n doesn't work, but restarting the
interface gets everything working again. Its the WAN interface to the
ISP so can only see my side
Greetings,
first some history. qpopper was masked a long time ago now but is still
installed and working on my Gentoo. Even if it doesn't show up anymore
on eix. But it does on eix-test-obsolete.
I don't like this situation and would like to get rid of qpopper and
replace it with another
28 matches
Mail list logo
