Matt Connell wrote:
> On 2020-03-16 19:46, Dale wrote:
>> Anything that can do, I can do locally by saving a web page or
>> downloading the content.
> Pocket is easily replaced by just synchronizing bookmarks, for most
> people's purposes, and FF already supports that.
>
> If you need more than
On 2020-03-16 19:46, Dale wrote:
> Anything that can do, I can do locally by saving a web page or
> downloading the content.
Pocket is easily replaced by just synchronizing bookmarks, for most
people's purposes, and FF already supports that.
If you need more than that, I can recommend Wallabag
Dale wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>> On Monday, 16 March 2020 21:08:10 GMT Dale wrote:
>>> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
After the latest stable firefox upgrade to version 68.6 I again started
seeing DNS queries for Pocket related domains. I found this in
prefs.js:
Michael wrote:
> On Monday, 16 March 2020 21:08:10 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>>> After the latest stable firefox upgrade to version 68.6 I again started
>>> seeing DNS queries for Pocket related domains. I found this in
>>> prefs.js:
>>>
>>>
On Monday, 16 March 2020 21:08:10 GMT Dale wrote:
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > After the latest stable firefox upgrade to version 68.6 I again started
> > seeing DNS queries for Pocket related domains. I found this in
> > prefs.js:
> >
> >
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> After the latest stable firefox upgrade to version 68.6 I again started
> seeing DNS queries for Pocket related domains. I found this in
> prefs.js:
>
> user_pref("browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.section.highlights.includePocket",
> true);
>
> I am not sure if this
After the latest stable firefox upgrade to version 68.6 I again started
seeing DNS queries for Pocket related domains. I found this in
prefs.js:
user_pref("browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.section.highlights.includePocket",
true);
I am not sure if this setting was new with this version or if
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:51:06 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> Hi all. I'm having a problem with os-prober not finding other linux
> partitions.
>
> I'm on x86_64 and an old spinning drive with an msdos partition table
> and 4 primary partitions, 3 linux and 1 swap.
>
> os-prober runs
hi - is that true?
it seems to be using it automatically when tor.service is running.
what's the point? e.g. is it made to ensure that we reduce the probability of
having a single man in the middle that may consistently fool us? by replacing
it by varying men in the middle that is harder for
Hi all. I'm having a problem with os-prober not finding other linux
partitions.
I'm on x86_64 and an old spinning drive with an msdos partition table
and 4 primary partitions, 3 linux and 1 swap.
os-prober runs successfully as per bash's return code, but no partitions
are found.
grub (grub2)
10 matches
Mail list logo
