tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got around the Python problems...but got new compilation hazards...:
>
>
>
> cd /var/tmp/portage/sci-electronics/kicad-5.1.4/work/kicad-5.1.4_build/common
> && /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DGLM_FORCE_CTOR_INIT -DHAVE_STDINT_H
> -DKICAD_SCRIPTING
Hi,
I got around the Python problems...but got new compilation hazards...:
cd /var/tmp/portage/sci-electronics/kicad-5.1.4/work/kicad-5.1.4_build/common
&& /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DGLM_FORCE_CTOR_INIT -DHAVE_STDINT_H
-DKICAD_SCRIPTING -DKICAD_SCRIPTING_ACTION_MENU
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 2:11 PM Dale wrote:
>> I did find a WD Red 8TB drive. It costs a good bit more. It's a good
>> deal but still costs more. I'm going to keep looking. Eventually I'll
>> either spend the money on the drive or find a really good deal. My home
>>
On 10/05/2020 20:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
I did find a WD Red 8TB drive. It costs a good bit more. It's a good
deal but still costs more. I'm going to keep looking. Eventually I'll
either spend the money on the drive or find a really good deal. My home
directory is at 69% so I got some time
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 2:11 PM Dale wrote:
>
> I did find a WD Red 8TB drive. It costs a good bit more. It's a good
> deal but still costs more. I'm going to keep looking. Eventually I'll
> either spend the money on the drive or find a really good deal. My home
> directory is at 69% so I
On Sunday, May 10, 2020 5:02 PM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> A more permanent solution would be to fix the error in newsboat, or patch the
> ebuild to create this symlink upon installation of stfl or newsboat.
thanks a lot for your time. highly appreciated.
any reason why it isn't a bug in libstfl?
Jack wrote:
> On 2020.05.10 02:49, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this morning I had a massive update of my system.
>>
>> Beside others kicad failed to recompile with this message
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> * Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
>> * the
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 5/10/20 1:02 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I think it is too. Your link shows about what the link I was looking
>> at does.
>>
>> I did research the SATA and SAS connector issue again. Seagate has a
>> picture of both for comparison and the drive I was looking at
hi:
shell> newsboat
newsboat: error while loading shared libraries: libstfl.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
shell> ls /usr/lib64/libstfl.so* -lh
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 10 15:27 /usr/lib64/libstfl.so ->
libstfl.so.0.24*
-rwxr-xr-x 1
On 2020.05.10 02:49, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
Hi,
this morning I had a massive update of my system.
Beside others kicad failed to recompile with this message
Calculating dependencies... done!
* Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
* the following required packages not being
On 2020.05.10 02:54, Ashley Dixon wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:49:14AM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Is it possible to install the older version of boost somehow "in
> parallel" withouth screwing up the rest of the system?
Gentoo calls this "slotting", in which multiple versions of a
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 02:46:39PM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> any reason why it isn't a bug in libstfl? e.g.
> shouldn't it create a symlink to libstfl.so.0 as
> well?
See [1] and [2] for an overview of the versioning and naming schemes commonly
used by shared objects libraries.
On 5/10/20 1:02 AM, Dale wrote:
Hi Michael,
I think it is too. Your link shows about what the link I was looking at
does.
I did research the SATA and SAS connector issue again. Seagate has a
picture of both for comparison and the drive I was looking at is a SAS
drive. When I did more
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 12:52:46PM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> shell> newsboat
> newsboat: error while loading shared libraries: libstfl.so.0: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
Searching on portagefilelist.de, this file appears in dev-libs/stfl. Okay, let's
have
On Sunday, 10 May 2020 09:58:43 BST Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 10/05/2020 11:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday, 8 May 2020 15:28:08 BST Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> >> For the kernel you need [1], which is not yet in any released versions or
> >> even Linus' main tree. With it it works fine
That did the trick, thank you.
On 2020-05-10 10:27, Ashley Dixon wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:12:26AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
!!! Couldn't download 'proj-4.9.2-org_proj4_PJ.h'. Aborting.
* Fetch failed for 'sci-libs/proj-4.9.2', Log file:
*
I meant the sync. I probably need to sync my system
On 2020-05-10 10:47, Ashley Dixon wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:33:03AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
can you recommend a good emerge(1) invocation for that?
I don't really understand what you mean, sorry. 4.9.2 is not available due to
On 10/05/2020 11:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Friday, 8 May 2020 15:28:08 BST Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
For the kernel you need [1], which is not yet in any released versions or
even Linus' main tree. With it it works fine - using it right now.
I see it's to go into the latest upstream kernel
On Friday, 8 May 2020 15:28:08 BST Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> For the kernel you need [1], which is not yet in any released versions or
> even Linus' main tree. With it it works fine - using it right now.
I see it's to go into the latest upstream kernel - well, of course it is. Up
to now I've
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:33:03AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> can you recommend a good emerge(1) invocation for that?
I don't really understand what you mean, sorry. 4.9.2 is not available due to
security issues, and has thus been dropped from the Portage tree, so you need to
sync your tree
can you recommend a good emerge(1) invocation for that?
On 2020-05-10 10:27, Ashley Dixon wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:12:26AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
!!! Couldn't download 'proj-4.9.2-org_proj4_PJ.h'. Aborting.
* Fetch failed for 'sci-libs/proj-4.9.2', Log file:
*
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:12:26AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> !!! Couldn't download 'proj-4.9.2-org_proj4_PJ.h'. Aborting.
> * Fetch failed for 'sci-libs/proj-4.9.2', Log file:
> * '/var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/proj-4.9.2/temp/build.log'
That version of `proj` is rather old, when did you last do a
On Fri, 08 May 2020 13:18:02 +0100
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Afternoon all,
>
> Today's update included this latest version of gcc. I installed it, switched
> to it and rebuilt @system and the kernel. On booting, The system hung at its
> very first loading: as soon as I selected the kernel to
What should I do here?
Connecting to trac.osgeo.org|140.211.15.30|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
Location:
https://trac.osgeo.org/proj/export/2647/trunk/proj/src/org_proj4_PJ.h
[following]
--2020-05-09 22:22:47--
Hi Michael,
I think it is too. Your link shows about what the link I was looking at
does.
I did research the SATA and SAS connector issue again. Seagate has a
picture of both for comparison and the drive I was looking at is a SAS
drive. When I did more research, it seems you can connect a
According to this URL this drive claims to use perpendicular recording, so it
is probably a PMR drive.
https://www.disctech.com/Seagate-ST8000NM0045-8TB-SATA-Hard-Drive
This finding is reinforced in this URL:
https://www.disctech.com/Seagate-ST8000NM0045-8TB-SATA-Hard-Drive
On Sunday, 10
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:49:14AM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Is it possible to install the older version of boost somehow "in
> parallel" withouth screwing up the rest of the system?
Gentoo calls this "slotting", in which multiple versions of a dependency package
can be installed
Howdy,
I found a deal. It's open box but it's a good price. I've googled to
try to find out if it is PMR or SMR but I can't find anything that says
one way or another. I did find where it says it has a sustained
throughput of 249MB/Sec which makes me think it is PMR, plus it is a
NAS/SAS
Hi,
this morning I had a massive update of my system.
Beside others kicad failed to recompile with this message
Calculating dependencies... done!
* Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
* the following required packages not being installed:
*
*
29 matches
Mail list logo
